World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 77 1647 1477 186 171 476 22891

Andrew Paul Smith publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Andrew Paul Smith between 1960 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Andrew Paul Smith published across 67 years, from 1960 to 2026, averaging 9.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 33 publications in 2021. 16 of the 619 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1960 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 33. Peak 33 publications in 2021. 1960: 1 publication 1961: 0 publications 1962: 1 publication 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 1 publication 1966: 2 publications 1967: 4 publications 1968: 3 publications 1969: 6 publications 1970: 4 publications 1971: 3 publications 1972: 4 publications 1973: 3 publications 1974: 1 publication 1975: 4 publications 1976: 3 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 1 publication 1981: 2 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 5 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 8 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 7 publications 1991: 8 publications 1992: 15 publications 1993: 12 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 12 publications 1996: 14 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 11 publications 1999: 18 publications 2000: 11 publications 2001: 16 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 13 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 15 publications 2006: 16 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 23 publications 2012: 18 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 29 publications 2019: 28 publications 2020: 32 publications 2021: 33 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 15 publications 2026: 1 publication
1960 2026

619 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Andrew Paul Smith: publications per year, 1960 to 2026
Year Publications
1960 1
1961 0
1962 1
1963 0
1964 0
1965 1
1966 2
1967 4
1968 3
1969 6
1970 4
1971 3
1972 4
1973 3
1974 1
1975 4
1976 3
1977 0
1978 0
1979 1
1980 1
1981 2
1982 2
1983 2
1984 0
1985 5
1986 4
1987 5
1988 8
1989 4
1990 7
1991 8
1992 15
1993 12
1994 5
1995 12
1996 14
1997 8
1998 11
1999 18
2000 11
2001 16
2002 10
2003 13
2004 10
2005 15
2006 16
2007 8
2008 12
2009 13
2010 12
2011 23
2012 18
2013 15
2014 10
2015 20
2016 20
2017 16
2018 29
2019 28
2020 32
2021 33
2022 19
2023 11
2024 9
2025 15
2026 1
Total 619
Download as CSV

Andrew Paul Smith publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew Paul Smith sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 471–480 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 476 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25 476
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Andrew Paul Smith D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew Paul Smith sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 76–77 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132 77
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Andrew Paul Smith is affiliated with Cardiff University in the United Kingdom. Their research spans psychology and medicine, with a focus on key subfields including general health professions, social psychology, clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, and surgery. The scope of their research touches on several important topics such as COVID-19 and mental health, workplace health and well-being, sleep and work-related fatigue, psychological well-being and life satisfaction, job satisfaction and organizational behavior, the impact of technology on adolescents, and healthcare professionals' stress and burnout.

Smith has published research across various venues. Frequent publication venues include Spectrum Research Repository (Concordia University), Journal of Education Society and Behavioural Science, Behavioral Sciences, American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, and Sumerianz Journal of Social Science.

Their recent papers include:

  • Loneliness and Problematic Internet Use during COVID-19 Lock-Down (2021), published in Behavioral Sciences
  • ASHP Guidelines on Emergency Medicine Pharmacist Services (2020), published in American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy
  • Work-family conflict and psychophysical health conditions of nurses: Gender differences and moderating variables (2020), published in Japan Journal of Nursing Science
  • Young users' social media addiction: causes, consequences and preventions (2021), published in Information Technology and People
  • A lexicon-based approach to detecting suicide-related messages on Twitter (2020), published in Biomedical Signal Processing and Control

Notable frequent co-authors collaborating with Smith include Reza Kazemi, Hasah Alheneidi, Jialin Fan, Arwel James, and Jing Zhang.

Smith's book publications comprise titles released by IGI Global and Cambridge University Press. One such work is Handbook of Research on the Complexities and Strategies of Occupational Stress (2022), and another is Dickens and the Gothic (2024).

Best Publications

  • Psychological Stress and Susceptibility to the Common Cold

    Sheldon Cohen;David A.J. Tyrrell;Andrew P. Smith

  • Effects of caffeine on human behavior.

    Andrew Paul Smith

  • Negative life events, perceived stress, negative affect, and susceptibility to the common cold

    Sheldon Cohen;David A.J. Tyrrell;Andrew P Smith

  • Occupational stress, job characteristics, coping, and the mental health of nurses

    George Mark;Andrew Paul Smith

  • Smoking, alcohol consumption, and susceptibility to the common cold.

    Sheldon Cohen;David A.J. Tyrrell;Michael A.H. Russell;Martin J. Jarvis

  • Effects of occupational stress, job characteristics, coping, and attributional style on the mental health and job satisfaction of university employees.

    George Mark;Andrew Paul Smith

  • Handbook of human performance

    D. M Jones;A. P. Smith

  • StreSS modelS: A review And SuggeSted new direction

    George M. Mark;Andrew P. Smith

  • Decrease of psychomotor performance in subjects with latent 'asymptomatic' toxoplasmosis.

    J. Havlíček;Z. Gašová;Andrew Paul Smith;K. Zvára

  • Effects of breakfast and caffeine on cognitive performance, mood and cardiovascular functioning

    Andrew Smith;Anna Kendrick;Andrea Maben;Jenny Salmon

  • Scale of occupational stress:a further analysis of the impact of demographic factors and type of job

    Andrew Smith;C Brice;Alison Collins;Rachel McNamara

  • Breakfast cereal and caffeinated coffee: Effects on working memory, attention, mood and cardiovascular function.

    Andrew Paul Smith;Rachel Clark;John Gallagher

  • The effects of caffeine on simulated driving, subjective alertness and sustained attention

    Carolyn Frances Brice;Andrew Paul Smith

  • Job strain, effort-reward imbalance, and stress at work: competing or complementary models?

    Michael Calnan;Emma Jane Kirsty Wadsworth;Margaret May;Andrew Paul Smith

  • A review of the effects of noise on human performance

    Andrew Smith

  • Caffeine consumption and self-assessed stress, anxiety, and depression in secondary school children

    Gareth Richards;Andrew Paul Smith

  • Noradrenaline and attention lapses

    Andrew Paul Smith;David Nutt

  • Effects of caffeine on mood and performance: a study of realistic consumption.

    Carolyn Frances Brice;Andrew Paul Smith

  • Caffeine and central noradrenaline: effects on mood, cognitive performance, eye movements and cardiovascular function

    Andrew Paul Smith;Carolyn Frances Brice;Jon Nash;Neil Rich

  • Seafarer fatigue: The Cardiff Research Programme

    Andrew Paul Smith;Paul Howard Allen;Emma Jane Kirsty Wadsworth

  • Fatigue and health in a seafaring population

    Emma Jane Kirsty Wadsworth;Paul Howard Allen;Rachel Louise McNamara;Andrew Paul Smith

  • Effects of repeated doses of caffeine on mood and performance of alert and fatigued volunteers

    Andrew Paul Smith;David M. Sutherland;Gary Christopher

Frequent Co-Authors

Sharon Anne Simpson
Sharon Anne Simpson University of Glasgow
David J. Nutt
David J. Nutt Imperial College London
Donald E. Broadbent
Donald E. Broadbent University of Oxford
Ian Harvey
Ian Harvey University of East Anglia
Asantha Cooray
Asantha Cooray University of California, Irvine
Sheldon Cohen
Sheldon Cohen Carnegie Mellon University
Dimitra Rigopoulou
Dimitra Rigopoulou University of Oxford
Dylan Marc Jones
Dylan Marc Jones Cardiff University
Stephen Stansfeld
Stephen Stansfeld Queen Mary University of London
Douglas Scott
Douglas Scott University of British Columbia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are interested in psychology, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career pathways such as counseling, social work, and community services. Many students find that online programs offer the flexibility and affordability needed to pursue their studies while balancing work or personal commitments.

Social work is a popular field for psychology majors, and students often search for cheapest online bsw programs in USA to minimize educational costs. Regional options also exist, such as affordable online social work degrees in Boise and affordable online social work programs in Kentucky, helping students access budget-friendly degrees closer to home.

For those in Massachusetts, cheapest online social work degrees in Massachusetts showcase regional opportunities that combine quality with value. Completing a psychology-related degree online can lead to careers in human services, mental health, research, or further graduate study. As the demand for skilled professionals grows, online options continue to make mental health and social work careers more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew Paul Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles