World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
79
Citations
22229
World Ranking
17587
National Ranking
1592

Ian Harvey publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ian Harvey sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 285 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Ian Harvey D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ian Harvey sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ian Harvey is affiliated with the University of East Anglia in the United Kingdom. Their academic profile is notable for its association with this institution, which suggests engagement in research and teaching activities within that academic environment.

No specific details regarding Ian Harvey's recent papers, research topics, or fields of study are currently available. Similarly, there is no information about frequent co-authors, publication venues, or book publications linked to their career.

The absence of published titles, citation counts, or awards indicates that publicly accessible records may not include detailed bibliometric data for Ian Harvey. This profile therefore focuses on confirmed affiliations and the general research context implied by the known data.

The University of East Anglia is known for a wide range of research disciplines, which may provide a broad framework for the academic activities of Ian Harvey, but without additional information, it is not possible to delineate specific research interests or areas of expertise.

Best Publications

  • A pragmatic–explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designers

    Kevin E. Thorpe;Merrick Zwarenstein;Andrew D. Oxman;Shaun Treweek

  • Flavonoids, flavonoid-rich foods, and cardiovascular risk: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

    Lee Hooper;Paul A Kroon;Eric B Rimm;Jeffrey S Cohn

  • Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases.

    F Song;S Parekh;L Hooper;Y K Loke

  • Systematic review of multidisciplinary interventions in heart failure

    RC Holland;J Battersby;IM Harvey;EA Lenaghan

  • Does home based medication review keep older people out of hospital? The HOMER randomised controlled trial

    Richard Holland;Elizabeth Lenaghan;Ian Harvey;Richard Smith

  • Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of bone morphogenetic proteins in the non-healing of fractures and spinal fusion: a systematic review.

    KR Garrison;ST Donell;JJ Ryder;I Shemilt

  • Prevalence and risk factors for common vision problems in children: data from the ALSPAC study.

    Cathy Williams;Kate Northstone;Margaret Howard;Ian Harvey

  • Leukotriene Antagonists as First-Line or Add-On Asthma-Controller Therapy

    David Price;Stanley D. Musgrave;Lee Shepstone;Elizabeth V. Hillyer

  • Relationship between body mass and gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms: The Bristol Helicobacter Project

    Liam Murray;Brian Johnston;Athene Lane;Ian Harvey

  • Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) for fracture healing in adults

    Kimberly R Garrison;Ian Shemilt;Simon Donell;Jonathan J Ryder

  • A systematic review of comparisons of effect sizes derived from randomised and non-randomised studies.

    MacLehose Rr;Reeves Bc;Harvey Im;Sheldon Ta

  • A randomised controlled trial. Shifting boundaries of doctors and physiotherapists in orthopaedic outpatient departments.

    Gavin Daker-White;Alison J Carr;Ian Harvey;Gillian Woolhead

  • Amblyopia treatment outcomes after screening before or at age 3 years: follow up from randomised trial

    C Williams;K Northstone;RA Harrad;JM Sparrow

  • Screening in the community to reduce fractures in older women (SCOOP): a randomised controlled trial

    Lee Shepstone;Elizabeth Lenaghan;Cyrus Cooper;Shane Clarke

  • Psychopathological syndromes in the functional psychoses: associations with course and outcome.

    J. Van Os;T. A. Fahy;P. Jones;I. Harvey

  • Local treatments for cutaneous warts: systematic review.

    Sam Gibbs;Ian Harvey;Jane Sterling;Rosemary Stark

  • Adjusted indirect comparison may be less biased than direct comparison for evaluating new pharmaceutical interventions

    F Song;IM Harvey;R Lilford

  • Physical activity and dietary behaviour in a population-based sample of British 10-year old children: the SPEEDY study (Sport, Physical activity and Eating behaviour: Environmental Determinants in Young people)

    Esther M. F. van Sluijs;Paula M. L. Skidmore;Kim Mwanza;Andrew P. Jones

  • Insight and psychotic illness. Cross-sectional and longitudinal associations.

    A David;J van Os;P Jones;I Harvey

  • Improving oral health in institutionalised elderly people by educating caregivers: a randomised controlled trial

    Heather Frenkel;Ian Harvey;Robert G. Newcombe

Frequent Co-Authors

Jenny L Donovan
Jenny L Donovan University of Bristol
Timothy J. Peters
Timothy J. Peters University of Bristol
Liam J. Murray
Liam J. Murray Queen's University Belfast
David J. Torgerson
David J. Torgerson University of York
Amanda Howe
Amanda Howe University of East Anglia
Richard Smith
Richard Smith University of Exeter
David Price
David Price University of Aberdeen
Cyrus Cooper
Cyrus Cooper University of Southampton
Luke Vale
Luke Vale Newcastle University
Andrew Briggs
Andrew Briggs University of Glasgow

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a pathway into medicine or healthcare but want alternatives to traditional MD programs, there are several flexible online options. For students interested in the business side of medicine, medical billing and coding schools with financial aid can offer a solid start with the added benefit of financial support.

Nursing remains a rewarding and in-demand career. Some students may seek nursing programs without TEAS exam requirements, making entry to nursing degrees more accessible for a range of candidates.

For those who want to lead or manage within healthcare systems, an online degree in healthcare administration can prepare you for administrative and leadership roles in healthcare settings.

Practicing registered nurses interested in specializing as family nurse practitioners can consider various RN to FNP bridge programs that allow them to advance their careers with flexible online study.

Exploring these programs can help you find a career path in healthcare that fits your goals, schedule, and interests.

Best Scientists Citing Ian Harvey

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles