World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 82 15942 1461 432 30389

Liam J. Murray publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Liam J. Murray between 1984 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Liam J. Murray published across 42 years, from 1984 to 2025, averaging 11.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 35 publications in 2011. 2 of the 470 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 35. Peak 35 publications in 2011. 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 10 publications 2001: 14 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 17 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 18 publications 2006: 22 publications 2007: 19 publications 2008: 28 publications 2009: 19 publications 2010: 34 publications 2011: 35 publications 2012: 28 publications 2013: 33 publications 2014: 24 publications 2015: 28 publications 2016: 24 publications 2017: 26 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 4 publications 2023: 32 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 2 publications
1984 2025

470 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Liam J. Murray: publications per year, 1984 to 2025
Year Publications
1984 1
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 1
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 2
1996 0
1997 2
1998 0
1999 3
2000 10
2001 14
2002 11
2003 17
2004 11
2005 18
2006 22
2007 19
2008 28
2009 19
2010 34
2011 35
2012 28
2013 33
2014 24
2015 28
2016 24
2017 26
2018 11
2019 8
2020 2
2021 1
2022 4
2023 32
2024 0
2025 2
Total 470
Download as CSV

Liam J. Murray publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Liam J. Murray sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 421–440 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 432 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806 432
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Liam J. Murray D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Liam J. Murray sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 82–83 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027 82
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Liam J. Murray was a researcher affiliated with Queen's University Belfast in the United Kingdom. Their scholarly work focused primarily on medicine, with notable contributions within specialized areas including surgery, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, molecular biology, education, and health informatics.

The scientist's research addressed several key topics, with frequent attention to esophageal cancer research and treatment, gastric cancer management and outcomes, artificial intelligence applications in healthcare and education, online learning and analytics, literacy, media and education, esophageal and gastrointestinal pathology, and eosinophilic esophagitis.

Their publication record included papers across diverse academic journals and venues. Among the recent papers were:

  • Fusobacterium nucleatum in the Colorectum and Its Association with Cancer Risk and Survival: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2020) in Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
  • Extending digital literacies: Proposing an agentive literacy to tackle the problems of distractive technologies in language learning (2020) in ReCALL
  • Experiences of accessing and using breast cancer services in Vietnam: a descriptive qualitative study (2020) in BMJ Open
  • Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Academia: A Case Study of Critical Teaching and Learning in Higher Education (2023) in Global Social Sciences Review
  • Insights into Student Perceptions: Investigating Artificial Intelligence (AI) Tool Usability in Irish Higher Education at the University of Limerick (2023) in Global Digital & Print Media Review

Frequent collaborators with whom they co-authored most publications included Thomas L. Vaughan, David C. Whiteman, Michael B. Cook, Douglas A. Corley, and Marilie D. Gammon.

Throughout their career, the researcher regularly published work in the following venues:

  • UNC Libraries
  • Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
  • Global Social Sciences Review
  • ReCALL
  • BMJ Open

Their contributions encompassed a balance between clinical medical research and explorations of educational technology and artificial intelligence within academic settings, reflecting an interdisciplinary approach to healthcare and education challenges.

Best Publications

  • QuPath: Open source software for digital pathology image analysis

    Peter Bankhead;Maurice B. Loughrey;Maurice B. Loughrey;José A. Fernández;Yvonne Dombrowski

  • The prevalence of celiac disease in Europe: Results of a centralized, international mass screening project

    Kirsi Mustalahti;Carlo Catassi;Antti Reunanen;Elisabetta Fabiani

  • Risk of Malignant Progression in Barrett’s Esophagus Patients: Results from a Large Population-Based Study

    Shivaram Bhat;Helen G. Coleman;Fouad Yousef;Brian T. Johnston

  • The Incidence of Esophageal Cancer and High-Grade Dysplasia in Barrett's Esophagus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Fouad Yousef;Christopher Cardwell;Marie Cantwell;Karen Galway

  • Human papillomavirus related head and neck cancer survival: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    M A O'Rorke;M V Ellison;Liam Murray;M Moran

  • Relationship between body mass and gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms: The Bristol Helicobacter Project

    Liam Murray;Brian Johnston;Athene Lane;Ian Harvey

  • Cigarette Smoking and Adenocarcinomas of the Esophagus and Esophagogastric Junction: A Pooled Analysis From the International BEACON Consortium

    Michael B. Cook;Farin Kamangar;Farin Kamangar;David C. Whiteman;Neal D. Freedman

  • Body mass index in relation to oesophageal and oesophagogastric junction adenocarcinomas: a pooled analysis from the International BEACON Consortium

    Cathrine Hoyo;Michael B. Cook;Farin Kamangar;Farin Kamangar;Neal D. Freedman

  • Genetic and nutritional factors contributing to hyperhomocysteinemia in young adults.

    Leo A. J. Kluijtmans;Ian S. Young;Colin A. Boreham;Liam Murray

  • Risk factors for Barrett's oesophagus and oesophageal adenocarcinoma: results from the FINBAR study.

    Lesley A Anderson;RG Peter Watson;Seamus J Murphy;Brian T Johnston

  • Exposure to oral bisphosphonates and risk of esophageal cancer.

    Chris R. Cardwell;Christian C. Abnet;Marie M. Cantwell;Liam J. Murray

  • Cardiorespiratory fitness, physical activity, and arterial stiffness: the Northern Ireland Young Hearts Project.

    Colin A. Boreham;Isabel Ferreira;Jos W. Twisk;Alison M. Gallagher

  • Carbonated Soft Drink Consumption and Bone Mineral Density in Adolescence: The Northern Ireland Young Hearts Project

    C McGartland;PJ Robson;L Murray;G Cran

  • Genetic and environmental determinants of peak bone mass in young men and women

    Fiona E A McGuigan;Liam Murray;Alison Gallagher;George Davey-Smith

  • What level of physical activity protects against premature cardiovascular death? The Caerphilly study

    S. Yu;John Yarnell;P.M. Sweetnam;Liam Murray

  • Associations between physical fitness and activity patterns during adolescence and cardiovascular risk factors in young adulthood: the Northern Ireland Young Hearts Project

    C. Boreham;J. Twisk;Charlotte Neville;M. Savage

  • Epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori infection among 4742 randomly selected subjects from Northern Ireland.

    L J Murray;E E McCrum;A E Evans;K B Bamford

  • Tracking of physical activity, fitness, body composition and diet from adolescence to young adulthood: The Young Hearts Project, Northern Ireland

    Colin A.G. Boreham;Paula J. Robson;Alison M. Gallagher;Gordon W Cran

  • Helicobacter pylori infection: relation with cardiovascular risk factors, ischaemic heart disease, and social class.

    Liam J. Murray;Kathy B. Bamford;Dermot P.J. O'Reilly;Evelyn E. McCrum

  • Fitness, fatness, and coronary heart disease risk in adolescents: the Northern Ireland Young Hearts Project

    Colin Boreham;Jos Twisk;Liam Murray;Maurice Savage

Frequent Co-Authors

Ian S. Young
Ian S. Young Queen's University Belfast
Ian Harvey
Ian Harvey University of East Anglia
Douglas A. Corley
Douglas A. Corley Kaiser Permanente
Michael Donnelly
Michael Donnelly Queen's University Belfast
David C. Whiteman
David C. Whiteman QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
Jenny L Donovan
Jenny L Donovan University of Bristol
John V. Reynolds
John V. Reynolds Trinity College Dublin
Thomas L. Vaughan
Thomas L. Vaughan University of Washington
Christian C. Abnet
Christian C. Abnet National Institutes of Health
Weimin Ye
Weimin Ye Karolinska Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in the broader field of healthcare alongside, or as an alternative to, studying Medicine in the USA, there are a variety of flexible online degree options. Popular choices include online nutrition degree programs that allow students to explore the impact of diet on health and open doors to roles in wellness or public health education.

For professionals aspiring to positions in healthcare management, the best online mha programs offer a route to leadership roles within hospitals and medical organizations, all while studying remotely. Similarly, experienced registered nurses can advance their careers through RN to BSN programs—some of which do not require on-site training. Read more about does rn to bsn require clinicals to explore your options for online learning.

For nurses aiming for the highest level of clinical practice, the fastest dnp program listings help qualified RNs move quickly into advanced practice or leadership without sacrificing work commitments. These pathways allow for career growth while accommodating the realities of working professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Liam J. Murray

Recently Published Articles