World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 134 2138 1990 225 216 1217 72262

Timothy J. Peters publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Timothy J. Peters between 1971 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Timothy J. Peters published across 55 years, from 1971 to 2025, averaging 25 papers a year. Output peaked at 70 publications in 2015. 29 of the 1,377 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1971 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 70. Peak 70 publications in 2015. 1971: 1 publication 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 4 publications 1979: 5 publications 1980: 8 publications 1981: 15 publications 1982: 24 publications 1983: 32 publications 1984: 33 publications 1985: 50 publications 1986: 37 publications 1987: 38 publications 1988: 50 publications 1989: 40 publications 1990: 26 publications 1991: 34 publications 1992: 25 publications 1993: 29 publications 1994: 29 publications 1995: 29 publications 1996: 29 publications 1997: 26 publications 1998: 42 publications 1999: 34 publications 2000: 47 publications 2001: 48 publications 2002: 37 publications 2003: 50 publications 2004: 44 publications 2005: 34 publications 2006: 37 publications 2007: 23 publications 2008: 25 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 18 publications 2012: 18 publications 2013: 20 publications 2014: 27 publications 2015: 70 publications 2016: 30 publications 2017: 22 publications 2018: 24 publications 2019: 25 publications 2020: 25 publications 2021: 22 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 21 publications 2024: 20 publications 2025: 9 publications
1971 2025

1,377 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Timothy J. Peters: publications per year, 1971 to 2025
Year Publications
1971 1
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 4
1979 5
1980 8
1981 15
1982 24
1983 32
1984 33
1985 50
1986 37
1987 38
1988 50
1989 40
1990 26
1991 34
1992 25
1993 29
1994 29
1995 29
1996 29
1997 26
1998 42
1999 34
2000 47
2001 48
2002 37
2003 50
2004 44
2005 34
2006 37
2007 23
2008 25
2009 15
2010 11
2011 18
2012 18
2013 20
2014 27
2015 70
2016 30
2017 22
2018 24
2019 25
2020 25
2021 22
2022 15
2023 21
2024 20
2025 9
Total 1,377
Download as CSV

Timothy J. Peters publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Timothy J. Peters sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 1,201–1,220 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,217 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26 1,217
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Timothy J. Peters D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Timothy J. Peters sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 134–135 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 134 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163 134
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Timothy J. Peters is affiliated with the University of Bristol in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple areas within medicine and psychology, with a significant focus on surgery and clinical psychology subfields. Peters' work includes a notable volume of publications related to pulmonary and respiratory medicine, general health professions, and broader health topics.

Their research interests cover a range of topics including:

  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Mental health treatment and access
  • Digital mental health interventions
  • Prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment
  • Prostate cancer treatment and research
  • Total knee arthroplasty outcomes
  • Infant development and preterm care

Among recent papers authored or co-authored by Peters are:

  • Fifteen-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer (2023), New England Journal of Medicine
  • How much change is enough? Evidence from a longitudinal study on depression in UK primary care (2020), Psychological Medicine
  • Effect of a Digital Intervention on Depressive Symptoms in Patients With Comorbid Hypertension or Diabetes in Brazil and Peru (2021), JAMA
  • Patient-Reported Outcomes 12 Years after Localized Prostate Cancer Treatment (2023), NEJM Evidence
  • Functional and quality of life outcomes of localised prostate cancer treatments (Prostate Testing for Cancer and Treatment [ProtecT] study) (2022), British Journal of Urology

Frequent collaborators include Ricardo Araya, Márcia Scazufca, William Hollingworth, Carina Akemi Nakamura, and Pepijn Van de Ven. This network contributes to a multidisciplinary approach across medical and psychological research.

Peters frequently publishes in venues such as:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Trials
  • Value in Health
  • Wellcome Open Research
  • Psychological Medicine

In addition to journal articles, Peters has two book publications with Edinburgh University Press, both titled A Theological Jurisprudence of Speculative Cinema (2021).

Best Publications

  • 10-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer

    Freddie C. Hamdy;Jenny L. Donovan;J. Athene Lane;Malcolm Mason

  • ICIQ: a brief and robust measure for evaluating the symptoms and impact of urinary incontinence.

    Kerry Nl Avery;Jenny L Donovan;Tim J. Peters;Christine Shaw

  • A Novel Duodenal Iron-Regulated Transporter, IREG1, Implicated in the Basolateral Transfer of Iron to the Circulation

    Andrew T McKie;Paola Marciani;Andreas Rolfs;Karen Brennan

  • An iron-regulated ferric reductase associated with the absorption of dietary iron

    Andrew T. McKie;Dalna Barrow;Gladys O. Latunde-Dada;Andreas Rolfs

  • Patient-Reported Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer

    Donovan Jl;Hamdy Fc;Lane Ja;Mason M

  • Critical evaluation of the Illumina MethylationEPIC BeadChip microarray for whole-genome DNA methylation profiling

    Ruth Pidsley;Ruth Pidsley;Elena Zotenko;Elena Zotenko;Timothy J. Peters;Mitchell G. Lawrence

  • Best--worst scaling: What it can do for health care research and how to do it.

    Terry N. Flynn;Jordan J. Louviere;Tim J. Peters;Joanna Coast

  • Childhood obesity and adult cardiovascular mortality: a 57-y follow-up study based on the Boyd Orr cohort.

    D J Gunnell;S J Frankel;K Nanchahal;T J Peters

  • Oral submucous fibrosis: review on aetiology and pathogenesis.

    W.M. Tilakaratne;M.F. Klinikowski;Takashi Saku;T.J. Peters

  • De novo identification of differentially methylated regions in the human genome

    Timothy J Peters;Michael J Buckley;Aaron L Statham;Ruth Pidsley

  • Subgroup analyses in randomized trials: risks of subgroup-specific analyses; power and sample size for the interaction test.

    Sara T. Brookes;Elise Whitely;Matthias Egger;George Davey Smith

  • Quality improvement report: Improving design and conduct of randomised trials by embedding them in qualitative research: ProtecT (prostate testing for cancer and treatment) study. Commentary: presenting unbiased information to patients can be difficult.

    Jenny Donovan;Nicola Mills;Monica Smith;Lucy Brindle

  • Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: quantifying the risks of false-positives and false-negatives

    S T Brookes;E Whitley;T J Peters;P A Mulheran

  • Valuing the ICECAP capability index for older people

    Joanna Coast;Terry N. Flynn;Lucy Natarajan;Kerry Sproston

  • Treating depression in primary care in low-income women in Santiago, Chile: a randomised controlled trial

    Ricardo Araya;Graciela Rojas;Rosemarie Fritsch;Jorge Gaete

  • Therapist-delivered internet psychotherapy for depression in primary care: a randomised controlled trial

    David Kessler;Glyn Lewis;Surinder Kaur;Nicola Wiles

  • Carotid Baroreceptor Stimulation, Sympathetic Activity, Baroreflex Function, and Blood Pressure in Hypertensive Patients

    Karsten Heusser;Jens Tank;Stefan Engeli;André Diedrich

  • No effect of n-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid (EPA and DHA) supplementation on depressed mood and cognitive function: a randomised controlled trial.

    Peter J. Rogers;Katherine M. Appleton;David Kessler;Tim J. Peters

  • Hospital at home or acute hospital care? A cost minimisation analysis

    Joanna Coast;Suzanne H Richards;Tim J Peters;David J Gunnell

  • The International Continence Society “Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia” Study: The Bothersomeness of Urinary Symptoms

    T.J. Peters;J.L. Donovan;H.E. Kay;P. Abrams

Frequent Co-Authors

Glyn Lewis
Glyn Lewis University College London
Deborah Sharp
Deborah Sharp University of Bristol
Jenny L Donovan
Jenny L Donovan University of Bristol
David Gunnell
David Gunnell University of Bristol
Tom Fahey
Tom Fahey Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
Joanna Coast
Joanna Coast University of Bristol
David E. Neal
David E. Neal University of Cambridge
Freddie C. Hamdy
Freddie C. Hamdy University of Oxford
David Kessler
David Kessler University of Bristol
Jean Golding
Jean Golding University of Bristol

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in diversifying your healthcare education or exploring alternative medical careers? There are several flexible and affordable online degree options available for those who wish to expand their knowledge or specialize in rapidly growing fields.

For nurses, shortest online pmhnp programs can offer a fast track to becoming a Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner—an area of healthcare in high demand. Those aspiring to move into management roles may consider healthcare administration degrees, which provide essential skills for leadership positions across clinics, hospitals, and healthcare organizations.

Affordability is a key concern for many students. Exploring the masters in healthcare administration cost options can help you find programs that fit your budget. If you’re already a registered nurse holding a master’s degree, advancing your career through msn to dnp programs online can open doors to leadership, clinical education, and advocacy roles.

With these flexible online pathways, you can continue building your career in medicine while balancing personal and professional commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Timothy J. Peters

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles