World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 79 17706 16641 1605 1536 276 19605

Deborah Sharp publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Deborah Sharp between 1987 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Deborah Sharp published across 35 years, from 1987 to 2021, averaging 8.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2011. 5 of the 282 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2011. 1987: 1 publication 1988: 2 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 3 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 11 publications 2001: 13 publications 2002: 18 publications 2003: 12 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 17 publications 2009: 21 publications 2010: 20 publications 2011: 24 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 3 publications
1987 2021

282 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Deborah Sharp: publications per year, 1987 to 2021
Year Publications
1987 1
1988 2
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 2
1996 5
1997 1
1998 3
1999 8
2000 11
2001 13
2002 18
2003 12
2004 10
2005 9
2006 11
2007 14
2008 17
2009 21
2010 20
2011 24
2012 13
2013 10
2014 16
2015 13
2016 3
2017 6
2018 8
2019 6
2020 2
2021 3
Total 282
Download as CSV

Deborah Sharp publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Deborah Sharp sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 261–280 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 276 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722 276
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Deborah Sharp D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Deborah Sharp sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 78–79 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891 79
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Deborah Sharp is affiliated with the University of Bristol in the United Kingdom. Their academic work focuses on research conducted within this institution, contributing to the scholarly community associated with one of the prominent universities in the region.

The academic profile of Deborah Sharp does not include specific publicly available details on recent papers, publication venues, or co-authors. Likewise, there are no recorded book publications, awards, or detailed records of fields and subfields of study, or main topics related to their research.

Despite the lack of published research details or co-authorship records, Deborah Sharp's association with an established university suggests engagement with academic activities that may involve teaching, research, or collaborative scholarly efforts. The absence of specific data on topics or publications indicates that either the work is emerging or not extensively documented in publicly accessible sources at this time.

This profile reflects available data and does not speculate beyond the presented facts. It is focused strictly on verifiable information tied to Deborah Sharp's academic standing and affiliation.

Best Publications

  • Intellectual problems shown by 11-year-old children whose mothers had postnatal depression.

    Dale F. Hay;Susan Pawlby;Deborah Sharp;Paul Asten

  • Therapist-delivered internet psychotherapy for depression in primary care: a randomised controlled trial

    David Kessler;Glyn Lewis;Surinder Kaur;Nicola Wiles

  • The impact of postnatal depression on boys intellectual development

    Deborah Sharp;Dale F. Hay;Susan Pawlby;Gesine Schmücker

  • "Medication career" or "Moral career"? The two sides of managing antidepressants: a meta-ethnography of patients' experience of antidepressants

    Alice Malpass;Alison Shaw;Debbie Sharp;Fiona Walter

  • Ambulatory care sensitive conditions: terminology and disease coding need to be more specific to aid policy makers and clinicians.

    Sarah Purdy;TP Griffin;Chris J Salisbury;Debbie J Sharp

  • Antenatal depression predicts depression in adolescent offspring: prospective longitudinal community-based study.

    Susan Pawlby;Dale F. Hay;Deborah Sharp;Cerith S. Waters

  • Identification and Referral to Improve Safety (IRIS) of women experiencing domestic violence with a primary care training and support programme: a cluster randomised controlled trial

    Gene Feder;Roxane Agnew Davies;Kathleen Baird;Danielle Dunne

  • Diet or diet plus physical activity versus usual care in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: the Early ACTID randomised controlled trial.

    R. C. Andrews;Ashley R Cooper;A. A. Montgomery;Alastair J Norcross

  • Evaluation of computer based clinical decision support system and risk chart for management of hypertension in primary care: randomised controlled trial

    Alan A Montgomery;Tom Fahey;Tim J Peters;Christopher MacIntosh

  • Clinical features of colorectal cancer before diagnosis: a population-based case–control study

    W Hamilton;A Round;Debbie J Sharp;Tim Peters

  • Randomised controlled trial of Alexander technique lessons, exercise, and massage (ATEAM) for chronic and recurrent back pain

    Paul Little;George Lewith;Fran Webley;Maggie Evans

  • Pathways to Violence in the Children of Mothers Who Were Depressed Postpartum

    Dale F. Hay;Susan Pawlby;Adrian Angold;Gordon T. Harold

  • What are the clinical features of lung cancer before the diagnosis is made? A population based case-control study

    William T Hamilton;Tim J Peters;Alison P Round;Deborah J Sharp

  • Antepartum and postpartum exposure to maternal depression: Different effects on different adolescent outcomes

    Dale F. Hay;Susan Pawlby;Cerith S. Waters;Deborah Sharp

  • Facilitated physical activity as a treatment for depressed adults: randomised controlled trial

    Melanie Chalder;Nicola j. Wiles;John Campbell;Sandra P. Hollinghurst

  • Factors influencing help seeking in mentally distressed young adults: a cross-sectional survey.

    Lucy A Biddle;David Gunnell;Debbie J Sharp;Jenny L Donovan

  • Explaining non-help-seeking amongst young adults with mental distress: a dynamic interpretive model of illness behaviour.

    Lucy Biddle;Jenny Donovan;Debbie Sharp;David Gunnell

  • Detection of depression and anxiety in primary care: follow up study

    David Kessler;Olive Bennewith;Glyn Lewis;Deborah Sharp

  • Risk of ovarian cancer in women with symptoms in primary care: population based case-control study.

    William Hamilton;Tim J Peters;Clare Bankhead;Deborah Sharp

  • Non-attendance at general practices and outpatient clinics.

    Deborah J Sharp;William Hamilton

Frequent Co-Authors

Timothy J. Peters
Timothy J. Peters University of Bristol
Glyn Lewis
Glyn Lewis University College London
Katrina M Turner
Katrina M Turner University of Bristol
Paul Little
Paul Little University of Southampton
Gene Feder
Gene Feder University of Bristol
Susan Pawlby
Susan Pawlby King's College London
Kenneth R Fox
Kenneth R Fox University of Bristol
Dale F. Hay
Dale F. Hay Cardiff University
David Kessler
David Kessler University of Bristol
Jenny L Donovan
Jenny L Donovan University of Bristol

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students exploring paths related to Medicine in the USA, online programs offer flexible, efficient, and accessible opportunities. Many healthcare professionals are now turning to distance learning to accelerate their careers or enter new specialties.

For those aiming for advanced practice, online dnp programs without clinicals provide a streamlined path to doctoral credentials, focusing on leadership and policy roles without the added demand of on-site clinical hours. Alternatively, earning your nursing credentials quickly is possible through a 6 month lpn program, which can fast-track your entry into the lucrative and ever-growing nursing field.

Those interested in specialized mental health care can opt for the fastest psychiatric nurse practitioner program to address the rising demand for psychiatric and mental health professionals. If leadership or administrative roles appeal to you, an affordable healthcare administration degree online can help you build expertise in managing healthcare systems and facilities.

These flexible degree options allow you to tailor your studies to your career goals and lifestyle—whether clinical, administrative, or specialized.

Best Scientists Citing Deborah Sharp

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles