World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
51
Citations
8912
World Ranking
5268
National Ranking
552

Tony Kendrick publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tony Kendrick sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 254 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Tony Kendrick D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tony Kendrick sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tony Kendrick is affiliated with the University of Southampton in the United Kingdom. Their research encompasses a diverse range of topics primarily within psychology and medicine, with a particular focus on mental health treatment and access as well as the treatment of major depression.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Psychology
  • Medicine

Within these broad fields, their subfields of study comprise:

  • Social Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • General Health Professions
  • Pharmacology
  • Psychiatry and Mental Health

The primary topics covered across Tony Kendrick's work include:

  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Treatment of Major Depression
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

Tony Kendrick has contributed to several prominent publication venues, including:

  • British Journal of General Practice
  • Psychological Medicine
  • BMJ
  • Research Square (Research Square)
  • Health Technology Assessment

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Tony Kendrick illustrate their focus on antidepressant use and mental health prognosis. Notable recent publications include:

  • Maintenance or Discontinuation of Antidepressants in Primary Care, 2021, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Role of age, gender and marital status in prognosis for adults with depression: An individual patient data meta-analysis, 2021, Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
  • Approaches for discontinuation versus continuation of long-term antidepressant use for depressive and anxiety disorders in adults, 2021, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
  • Strategies to reduce use of antidepressants, 2020, British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
  • Socioeconomic Indicators of Treatment Prognosis for Adults With Depression, 2022, JAMA Psychiatry

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Glyn Lewis
  • Simon Gilbody
  • David Keßler
  • Nicola Wiles
  • Beth Stuart

Best Publications

  • Influence of initial severity of depression on effectiveness of low intensity interventions: meta-analysis of individual patient data

    Peter Bower;Evangelos Kontopantelis;Alex Sutton;Tony Kendrick

  • Explaining the rise in antidepressant prescribing: a descriptive study using the general practice research database

    Michael Moore;Ho Ming Yuen;Nick Dunn;Mark A Mullee

  • Routine use of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for improving treatment of common mental health disorders in adults.

    Tony Kendrick;Magdy El-Gohary;Beth Stuart;Simon Gilbody

  • Behavioural counselling in general practice for the promotion of healthy behaviour among adults at increased risk of coronary heart disease: randomised trial

    Andrew Steptoe;Sheelagh Doherty;Elizabeth Rink;Sally Kerry

  • Patients' and doctors' views on depression severity questionnaires incentivised in UK quality and outcomes framework: qualitative study.

    Christopher Dowrick;Geraldine M Leydon;Anita McBride;Amanda Howe

  • Management of depression in UK general practice in relation to scores on depression severity questionnaires: analysis of medical record data

    Tony Kendrick;Christopher Dowrick;Anita McBride;Amanda Howe

  • Multimorbidity, service organization and clinical decision making in primary care: a qualitative study.

    Peter Bower;Wendy Macdonald;Elaine Harkness;Linda Gask

  • Illness perceptions and glycaemic control in diabetes: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

    J Mc Sharry;R Moss-Morris;T Kendrick

  • Cardiovascular and respiratory risk factors and symptoms among general practice patients with long-term mental illness.

    Tony Kendrick

  • Research output on primary care in Australia, Canada, Germany, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States: bibliometric analysis

    Glanville J;Kendrick T;McNally R;Campbell J

  • Role of general practitioners in care of long term mentally ill patients.

    Tony Kendrick;Bonnie Sibbald;Tom Burns;Paul Freeling

  • Maintenance or Discontinuation of Antidepressants in Primary Care

    Gemma Lewis;Louise Marston;Larisa Duffy;Nick Freemantle

  • Why can't GPs follow guidelines on depression? : We must question the basis of the guidelines themselves

    Tony Kendrick

  • Common mental health disorders — identification and pathways to care: NICE clinical guideline

    Tony Kendrick;Stephen Pilling

  • Randomised controlled trial of effect of leaflets to empower patients in consultations in primary care.

    Paul Little;Martina Dorward;Greg Warner;Michael Moore

  • The clinical effectiveness of sertraline in primary care and the role of depression severity and duration (PANDA): a pragmatic, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial

    Gemma Lewis;Larisa Duffy;Anthony E Ades;Rebekah Amos

  • Attitudes to cardiovascular health promotion among GPs and practice nurses

    Andrew Steptoe;Sheelagh Doherty;Tony Kendrick;Elizabeth Rink

  • Qualitative study of depression management in primary care: GP and patient goals, and the value of listening

    Olwyn Johnston;Satinder Kumar;Kathleen Kendall;Robert Peveler

  • Randomised controlled trial of teaching general practitioners to carry out structured assessments of their long term mentally ill patients

    Tony Kendrick;Tom Burns;Paul Freeling

  • GP treatment decisions for patients with depression: an observational study

    Tony Kendrick;Fiona King;Louise Albertella;Peter W.F. Smith

  • Provision of care to general practice patients with disabling long-term mental illness: a survey in 16 practices.

    T Kendrick;T Burns;P Freeling;B Sibbald

  • Change in self-esteem, self-efficacy and the mood dimensions of depression as potential mediators of the physical activity and depression relationship: Exploring the temporal relation of change ☆ ☆☆

    Karen White;Tony Kendrick;Lucy Yardley

Frequent Co-Authors

Simon Gilbody
Simon Gilbody University of York
Glyn Lewis
Glyn Lewis University College London
Tom Burns
Tom Burns University of Oxford
David Kessler
David Kessler University of Bristol
Lucy Yardley
Lucy Yardley University of Bristol
Paul Little
Paul Little University of Southampton
Hugh Gravelle
Hugh Gravelle University of York
Edward R. Watkins
Edward R. Watkins University of Exeter
Hazel Inskip
Hazel Inskip University of Southampton
Peter K. Smith
Peter K. Smith Goldsmiths University of London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens doors to diverse career opportunities, including paths in counseling, therapy, and clinical practice. Students planning to become professional counselors should be aware that requirements vary by location. For example, those interested in how to become a mental health counselor in Dallas will find specific academic and licensing standards to meet in Texas.

Similarly, mental health counselor requirements in Denver may include state-specific coursework and supervised clinical hours. Aspiring counselors in Michigan should review the Detroit mental health counselor certification requirements to ensure they’re on the right path to licensure.

North Carolina students considering how to become a mental health counselor in Durham will also need to follow specific state guidelines for education and field experience. No matter where you live, researching local regulations alongside your online degree program is critical for a successful psychology career.

Best Scientists Citing Tony Kendrick

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles