World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
124
Citations
69494
World Ranking
213
National Ranking
35

Peter K. Smith publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter K. Smith sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 678 publications — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Peter K. Smith D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter K. Smith sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 124 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter K. Smith is affiliated with Goldsmiths University of London in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on Engineering and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology.

The main topics of their work include:

  • Near-Field Optical Microscopy
  • Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
  • Photonic and Optical Devices
  • Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis
  • Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications
  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism

Peter K. Smith has contributed to several subfields within their main areas of study, including:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Biophysics
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Molecular Biology
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Their recent papers illustrate a diverse research portfolio, published across different scientific venues. These include:

  • "Far-field unlabeled super-resolution imaging with superoscillatory illumination" (2020), published in APL Photonics
  • "Review and Hypothesis: A Potential Common Link Between Glial Cells, Calcium Changes, Modulation of Synaptic Transmission, Spreading Depression, Migraine, and Epilepsy-H+" (2021), published in Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
  • "Mitochondrial leak metabolism induces the Spemann-Mangold Organizer via Hif-1α in Xenopus" (2023), published in Developmental Cell
  • "1O: Osimertinib (osi) + datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) in patients (pts) with EGFR-mutated (EGFRm) advanced NSCLC (aNSCLC) whose disease progressed on first-line (1L) osi: ORCHARD" (2025), published in Journal of Thoracic Oncology
  • "What role can forests play in tackling climate change?" (2020), published in Spiral (Imperial College London)

Smith frequently publishes in venues such as Default Digital Object Group, APL Photonics, Developmental Cell, Journal of Thoracic Oncology, and Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience.

Collaboration is a notable aspect of their research profile. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Edward T. F. Rogers
  • Shmma Quraishe
  • Katrine S. Rogers
  • Tracey A. Newman
  • Nikolay I. Zheludev

Best Publications

  • Cyberbullying: Its Nature and Impact in Secondary School Pupils

    Peter K. Smith;Jess Mahdavi;Manuel Carvalho;Sonja Fisher

  • Cyberbullying: Another main type of bullying?

    Robert Slonje;Peter K. Smith

  • A Survey of the Nature and Extent of Bullying in Junior/Middle and Secondary Schools.

    Irene Whitney;Peter K. Smith

  • School Bullying: Insights and Perspectives

    Peter K. Smith;Sonia Sharp

  • Theories of Theories of Mind

    Peter Carruthers;Peter K. Smith

  • Physical Activity Play: The Nature and Function of a Neglected Aspect of Play.

    A. D. Pellegrini;Peter K. Smith

  • The nature of school bullying : a cross-national perspective

    Richard F. Catalano;Josine Junger-Tas;Yohji Morita;Dan Olweus

  • Definitions of Bullying: A Comparison of Terms Used, and Age and Gender Differences, in a Fourteen–Country International Comparison

    Peter K. Smith;Helen Cowie;Ragnar F. Olafsson;Andy P. D. Liefooghe

  • The nature of cyberbullying, and strategies for prevention

    Robert Slonje;Peter K. Smith;Ann FriséN

  • Bully/victim problems in middle-school children: Stability, self-perceived competence, peer perceptions and peer acceptance

    Michael J. Boulton;Peter K. Smith

  • Bullying in schools: Lessons from two decades of research

    Peter K. Smith;Paul Brain

  • Social cognition and bullying: Social inadequacy or skilled manipulation?

    Jeannette Sutton;Peter K. Smith;J Swettenham

  • Understanding Children's Development

    Peter K. Smith;Helen Cowie

  • The Effectiveness of Whole-School Antibullying Programs: A Synthesis of Evaluation Research

    J. David Smith;Barry H. Schneider;Peter K. Smith;Katerina Ananiadou

  • Bullying and ‘Theory of Mind’: A Critique of the ‘Social Skills Deficit’ View of Anti‐Social Behaviour

    Jon Sutton;Peter K. Smith;John Swettenham

  • Types of bullying behaviour and their correlates

    Ian Rivers;Peter K. Smith

  • What Good Schools can Do About Bullying Findings from a Survey in English Schools After a Decade of Research and Action

    Peter K. Smith;Shu Shu

  • Bullying in Schools: How Successful Can Interventions Be?

    Peter K. Smith;Debra Pepler;Ken Rigby

  • Bullying as a group process: An adaptation of the participant role approach

    Jeannette Sutton;Peter K. Smith

  • Longitudinal and Reciprocal Relations of Cyberbullying With Depression, Substance Use, and Problematic Internet Use Among Adolescents

    Manuel Gámez-Guadix;Izaskun Orue;Peter K. Smith;Esther Calvete

Frequent Co-Authors

Claire Foster
Claire Foster University of Southampton
Lucy Yardley
Lucy Yardley University of Bristol
Helen Cowie
Helen Cowie University of York
David L. Keefe
David L. Keefe Brown University
Michael J. Boulton
Michael J. Boulton University of Chester
Paul Little
Paul Little University of Southampton
Anthony D. Pellegrini
Anthony D. Pellegrini University of Minnesota
Lin Liu
Lin Liu Chinese Academy of Sciences
Herbert Scheithauer
Herbert Scheithauer Freie Universität Berlin
Adam Rutland
Adam Rutland University of Exeter

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens up diverse career pathways, especially in the growing field of mental health counseling. Many students pursue bachelor’s or master’s programs to take the first step toward a fulfilling career helping others. Online programs offer flexibility, allowing you to balance your studies with work or personal commitments.

Requirements for becoming a licensed counselor vary across the United States. For instance, if you plan to become a mental health counselor in Boise, you’ll need to meet Idaho’s specific education and licensure regulations. Similarly, understanding the mental health counselor requirements in Boston will help guide your education and professional experience.

Prospective counselors in New York should review the Buffalo mental health counselor education requirements, which often include supervised practice and exams. Meanwhile, those interested in practice in Arizona can learn about Chandler mental health counselor certification requirements to map out their path to licensure.

No matter where you hope to practice, researching local requirements and choosing an accredited online psychology program are crucial steps toward building a successful career in mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Peter K. Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles