World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
70
Citations
14969
World Ranking
7124
National Ranking
3270

David L. Keefe publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David L. Keefe sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 277 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

David L. Keefe D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David L. Keefe sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

David L. Keefe is affiliated with Brown University in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields related to medicine, biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with significant contributions in molecular biology, reproductive medicine, pediatrics, perinatology, and physiology.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Medicine
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Their subfields of study focus on:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
  • Physiology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Reproductive Medicine

The scientist's key research topics cover:

  • Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
  • Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
  • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Ovarian function and disorders
  • Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy

David L. Keefe has authored numerous publications, with recent notable papers including:

  • Characteristics and Outcomes of 241 Births to Women With Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Infection at Five New York City Medical Centers, 2020, Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Widespread Transcriptional Scanning in the Testis Modulates Gene Evolution Rates, 2020, Cell
  • Molecular Features of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Revealed by Transcriptome Analysis of Oocytes and Cumulus Cells, 2021, Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
  • The reproducibility of trophectoderm biopsies in euploid, aneuploid, and mosaic embryos using independently verified next-generation sequencing (NGS): a pilot study, 2020, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
  • Control of LINE-1 Expression Maintains Genome Integrity in Germline and Early Embryo Development, 2021, Reproductive Sciences

The scientist frequently publishes in the following venues:

  • Fertility and Sterility
  • Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
  • Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey
  • Human Reproduction
  • Reproductive Sciences

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • David H. McCulloh
  • J. Grifo
  • Fabiana B. Kohlrausch
  • Paula Andrea Navarro
  • Thalita S. Berteli

Best Publications

  • Physician Referral for Fertility Preservation in Oncology Patients: A National Study of Practice Behaviors

    Gwendolyn P. Quinn;Susan T. Vadaparampil;Ji Hyun Lee;Paul B. Jacobsen

  • Telomere lengthening early in development.

    Lin Liu;Susan M. Bailey;Maja Okuka;Purificación Muñoz

  • Mitochondrial deoxyribonucleic acid deletions in oocytes and reproductive aging in women

    David L. Keefe;Tracy Niven-Fairchild;Susan Powell;Syam Buradagunta

  • Telomere elongation in induced pluripotent stem cells from dyskeratosis congenita patients

    Suneet Agarwal;Suneet Agarwal;Yuin-Han Loh;Yuin-Han Loh;Erin M. McLoughlin;Erin M. McLoughlin;Junjiu Huang;Junjiu Huang

  • Quantification of hormone pulsatility via an approximate entropy algorithm

    Steven M. Pincus;David L. Keefe

  • Involvement of Mitochondria in Oxidative Stress-Induced Cell Death in Mouse Zygotes

    Lin Liu;James R. Trimarchi;James R. Trimarchi;David L. Keefe;David L. Keefe

  • Limited recovery of meiotic spindles in living human oocytes after cooling–rewarming observed using polarized light microscopy

    Wei-Hua Wang;Li Meng;Rickard J. Hackett;Rudolf Odenbourg

  • Oxidative Phosphorylation-Dependent and -Independent Oxygen Consumption by Individual Preimplantation Mouse Embryos

    James R. Trimarchi;Lin Liu;Lin Liu;D. Marshall Porterfield;Peter J.S. Smith

  • Oxidative stress contributes to arsenic-induced telomere attrition, chromosome instability and apoptosis

    Lin Liu;Lin Liu;James R. Trimarchi;James R. Trimarchi;Paula Navarro;Maria A. Blasco

  • The spindle observation and its relationship with fertilization after intracytoplasmic sperm injection in living human oocytes.

    Wei-Hua Wang;Li Meng;Rickard J Hackett;Rudolf Odenbourg

  • Müllerian inhibiting substance levels at the time of HCG administration in IVF cycles predict both ovarian reserve and embryo morphology

    T. Silberstein;D.T. MacLaughlin;I. Shai;J.R. Trimarchi

  • Oxytocin secretion and human parturition: pulse frequency and duration increase during spontaneous labor in women.

    Anna-Riitta Fuchs;Roberto Romero;David Keefe;Manuel Parra

  • Mitochondrial dysfunction leads to telomere attrition and genomic instability

    Lin Liu;James R. Trimarchi;Peter J. S. Smith;David L. Keefe

  • An Essential Role for Functional Telomeres in Mouse Germ Cells during Fertilization and Early Development

    Lin Liu;Maria A. Blasco;James R. Trimarchi;James R. Trimarchi;David L. Keefe;David L. Keefe

  • A reliable, noninvasive technique for spindle imaging and enucleation of mammalian oocytes.

    Lin Liu;Lin Liu;Rudolf Oldenbourg;James R. Trimarchi;James R. Trimarchi;David L. Keefe;David L. Keefe

  • Delay in oocyte aging in mice by the antioxidant N-acetyl-l-cysteine (NAC)

    Jinmiao Liu;Mengyuan Liu;Xiaoying Ye;Kai Liu

  • Oocyte competency is the key to embryo potential.

    David Keefe;Molly Kumar;Keri Kalmbach

  • Selected Contribution: Sex differences in osmotic regulation of AVP and renal sodium handling

    Nina S. Stachenfeld;Andres E. Splenser;Wendy L. Calzone;Matthew P. Taylor

  • The telomere theory of reproductive senescence in women.

    David L Keefe;Kerri Marquard;Lin Liu

  • Hormone replacement therapy may alleviate sleep apnea in menopausal women: a pilot study.

    David L. Keefe;Robert Watson;Frederick Naftolin

Frequent Co-Authors

Lin Liu
Lin Liu Chinese Academy of Sciences
Peter Smith
Peter Smith University of Aberdeen
Frederick Naftolin
Frederick Naftolin New York University
Maria A. Blasco
Maria A. Blasco Spanish National Cancer Research Centre
Hugh S. Taylor
Hugh S. Taylor Yale University
Carolyn M. Mazure
Carolyn M. Mazure Yale University
Luis M. Garcia-Segura
Luis M. Garcia-Segura Spanish National Research Council
Lawrence Scahill
Lawrence Scahill Emory University
Donald J. Cohen
Donald J. Cohen Yale University
Linda C. Giudice
Linda C. Giudice University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry can open doors to a wide range of rewarding careers in the health and science sectors. Many students are now choosing flexible online degree options to start or advance their careers. For example, pursuing an online nutritionist degree allows you to combine a passion for science with the ability to promote better health through diet.

If you’re interested in leadership within healthcare systems, you might consider programs with industry-recognized credentials, such as cahme accreditation mha programs. These programs are tailored for aspiring managers and executives. Those seeking advanced clinical roles without on-site requirements can look into dnp online no clinicals options, which offer maximum flexibility for working professionals.

For those aiming for the highest levels of leadership or academic research in healthcare, doctoral programs for healthcare administration provide a pathway to top-tier positions. These diverse online programs enable science and health-focused students to tailor their educational journey to their career goals, all while maintaining a balance with their personal and professional lives.

Best Scientists Citing David L. Keefe

Trending Scientists