World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
46
Citations
7578
World Ranking
6466
National Ranking
653

Claire Foster publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claire Foster sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 154 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Claire Foster D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claire Foster sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Critical research gaps and translational priorities for the successful prevention and treatment of breast cancer.

    Suzanne A. Eccles;Eric O. Aboagye;Simak Ali;Annie S. Anderson

  • Psychosocial implications of living 5 years or more following a cancer diagnosis: a systematic review of the research evidence.

    C. Foster;D. Wright;H. Hill;Jane B. Hopkinson

  • Recovery and self-management support following primary cancer treatment

    C Foster;D Fenlon

  • Balancing autonomy and responsibility: the ethics of generating and disclosing genetic information

    Nina Hallowell;Claire Foster;Ros Eeles;A. Ardern-Jones

  • Cancer survivors’ self-efficacy to self-manage in the year following primary treatment

    Claire Foster;Matthew Breckons;P. Cotterell;D. Barbosa

  • The health and well-being of cancer survivors in the UK: findings from a population-based survey

    J Elliott;A Fallows;L Staetsky;P W F Smith

  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of maintenance of physical activity behaviour change in cancer survivors

    Chloe Grimmett;Teresa Corbett;Jennifer Brunet;Jonathan Shepherd

  • Psychosocial impact of breast/ovarian (BRCA1/2) cancer-predictive genetic testing in a UK multi-centre clinical cohort

    M Watson;C Foster;R Eeles;D Eccles

  • Self-Management and Self-Management Support Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Mixed Research Synthesis of Stakeholder Views

    Emma Boger;Jaimie Ellis;Sue Latter;Claire Foster

  • What Facilitates or Impedes Family Communication Following Genetic Testing for Cancer Risk? A Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis of Primary Qualitative Research

    Kim Chivers Seymour;Julia Addington-Hall;Anneke M. Lucassen;Claire L. Foster

  • Effects of large native herbivores on other animals

    Claire N. Foster;Philip S. Barton;David B. Lindenmayer;David B. Lindenmayer

  • The research priorities of patients attending UK cancer treatment centres: findings from a modified nominal group study

    Jessica Corner;David Wright;Jane Hopkinson;Yasmin Gunaratnam

  • The physical and practical problems experienced by cancer survivors: a rapid review and synthesis of the literature

    S.G. Brearley;Z. Stamataki;J. Addington-Hall;C. Foster

  • Guilt, blame and responsibility: men's understanding of their role in the transmission of BRCA1/2 mutations within their family.

    Nina Hallowell;Audrey Arden-Jones;Ros Eeles;Claire Foster

  • Treatment demands and differential treatment of patients with cystic fibrosis and their siblings: patient, parent and sibling accounts.

    C Foster;C Eiser;P Oades;C Sheldon

  • Accommodating risk: Responses to BRCA1/2 genetic testing of women who have had cancer

    N Hallowell;C Foster;R Eeles;A Ardern-Jones

  • Communication about genetic testing in families of male BRCA1/2 carriers and non-carriers: patterns, priorities and problems.

    N. Hallowell;A. Ardern-Jones;R. Eeles;C.L. Foster

  • Genetic testing for women previously diagnosed with breast/ovarian cancer: examining the impact of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation searching.

    N Hallowell;C Foster;A Ardern-Jones;R Eeles

  • Pre-Surgery Depression and Confidence to Manage Problems Predict Recovery Trajectories of Health and Wellbeing in the First Two Years following Colorectal Cancer: Results from the CREW Cohort Study

    Claire Foster;Joanne Haviland;Jane Winter;Jane Winter;Chloe Grimmett

  • Listening to the views of people affected by cancer about cancer research: an example of participatory research in setting the cancer research agenda.

    David N.M. Wright;Jessica L. Corner;Jane B. Hopkinson;Claire Foster

  • Knowledge, ignorance and priorities for research in key areas of cancer survivorship: findings from a scoping review.

    Alison Richardson;Julia Addington-Hall;Z Amir;C Foster

  • Predictive testing for BRCA1/2: attributes, risk perception and management in a multi-centre clinical cohort

    C Foster;D G R Evans;R Eeles;D Eccles

Frequent Co-Authors

Maggie Watson
Maggie Watson University of Strathclyde
Peter K. Smith
Peter K. Smith Goldsmiths University of London
Rosalind A. Eeles
Rosalind A. Eeles Institute of Cancer Research
Julia Addington-Hall
Julia Addington-Hall University of Southampton
Lucy Yardley
Lucy Yardley University of Bristol
Diana Eccles
Diana Eccles University of Southampton
Carl May
Carl May London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Stanley W. Ashley
Stanley W. Ashley Brigham and Women's Hospital
Nina Hallowell
Nina Hallowell University of Oxford
Peter Smith
Peter Smith University of Aberdeen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens the door to various online degree options and diverse career pathways. Many students interested in mental health and behavioral sciences often consider degrees in social work as a closely related alternative. Social work programs offer practical, real-world experience and prepare graduates for impactful roles in community organizations, healthcare, schools, and private practice.

Cost is a major factor when selecting a program. For students in Arkansas, the most affordable social work degree programs in Little Rock offer flexible pathways to entry-level positions. If you are in the Northeast, you may be interested in exploring affordable social work programs in Massachusetts that balance accessibility and academic quality.

For those located in the Midwest, both affordable social work programs in Madison and affordable social work degrees in Marion provide strong foundations for launching a career. Regardless of location, online study options allow for greater flexibility and access to accredited programs across the USA, making it easier to start a fulfilling journey in psychology or social work.

Best Scientists Citing Claire Foster

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles