What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Internal medicine
- Surgery
- Cancer
His primary scientific interests are in Internal medicine, Surgery, Breast cancer, Endocrinology and Chemotherapy.
He has researched Internal medicine in several fields, including Gastroenterology and Oncology.
His research on Surgery often connects related topics like Cancer.
As part of the same scientific family, Stanley W. Ashley usually focuses on Breast cancer, concentrating on Clodronic acid and intersecting with Bone pain.
His Endocrinology research incorporates themes from Cancer research and Kinase.
His Chemotherapy research focuses on Mammary gland and how it relates to Primary chemotherapy.
His most cited work include:
- Overview of the main outcomes in breast-cancer prevention trials. (806 citations)
- Double-blind controlled trial of oral clodronate in patients with bone metastases from breast cancer. (499 citations)
- Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy The New 'Gold Standard'? (370 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Stanley W. Ashley focuses on Internal medicine, Surgery, Endocrinology, Oncology and Chemotherapy.
His study in Gastroenterology extends to Internal medicine with its themes.
His study in Radiation therapy, Regimen, Retrospective cohort study, Survival analysis and Survival rate is carried out as part of his studies in Surgery.
In the subject of general Endocrinology, his work in Jejunum, Small intestine, Intestinal absorption and Ileum is often linked to Peptide YY, thereby combining diverse domains of study.
His Pancreatic disease study results in a more complete grasp of Pancreas.
Pancreatitis is frequently linked to Acute pancreatitis in his study.
He most often published in these fields:
- Internal medicine (44.46%)
- Surgery (29.29%)
- Endocrinology (19.46%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2009-2021)?
- Internal medicine (44.46%)
- Surgery (29.29%)
- General surgery (8.75%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His scientific interests lie mostly in Internal medicine, Surgery, General surgery, Medical education and Oncology.
Stanley W. Ashley has researched Internal medicine in several fields, including Gastroenterology and Endocrinology.
His Endocrinology research includes themes of Sodium-Glucose Transporter 1, Cell cycle and Cell biology.
His studies in Acs nsqip, Distal pancreatectomy and Retrospective cohort study are all subfields of Surgery research.
His Medical education research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Clinical evaluation and MEDLINE.
His research integrates issues of Pancreatic cancer, Breast cancer, Metastatic breast cancer, Neoadjuvant treatment and Capecitabine in his study of Oncology.
Between 2009 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Crisis checklists for the operating room: development and pilot testing. (177 citations)
- Postgame Analysis: Using Video-Based Coaching for Continuous Professional Development (141 citations)
- Treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer with lapatinib and capecitabine in the lapatinib expanded access programme, including efficacy in brain metastases – the UK experience (111 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Internal medicine
- Surgery
- Cancer
Stanley W. Ashley mostly deals with Internal medicine, Surgery, Endocrinology, Medical education and General surgery.
His studies deal with areas such as Gastroenterology and Oncology as well as Internal medicine.
His Oncology study combines topics in areas such as Breast cancer, Metastatic breast cancer, Breast disease, Endoscopy and Adjuvant therapy.
His Endocrinology research incorporates elements of Sodium-Glucose Transporter 1, Cell cycle and Cell biology.
Stanley W. Ashley interconnects Learning environment and Surgical skills in the investigation of issues within Medical education.
In his study, Tracking is strongly linked to Fellowship training, which falls under the umbrella field of General surgery.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
