World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 36 9640 9020 5084 4639 105 3762

Nadine A. Kasparian publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Nadine A. Kasparian between 2006 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Nadine A. Kasparian published across 21 years, from 2006 to 2026, averaging 9.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2024. 20 of the 199 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2024. 2006: 1 publication 2007: 5 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 20 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 22 publications 2025: 19 publications 2026: 1 publication
2006 2026

199 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Nadine A. Kasparian: publications per year, 2006 to 2026
Year Publications
2006 1
2007 5
2008 4
2009 4
2010 6
2011 4
2012 8
2013 7
2014 3
2015 8
2016 16
2017 10
2018 6
2019 20
2020 18
2021 8
2022 17
2023 12
2024 22
2025 19
2026 1
Total 199
Download as CSV

Nadine A. Kasparian publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nadine A. Kasparian sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 105 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736 105
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Nadine A. Kasparian D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nadine A. Kasparian sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 36
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Nadine A. Kasparian is affiliated with Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center in the United States. Their academic work spans primarily the field of Medicine, with a total of 166 publications. Within this domain, their contributions are notably distributed across several subfields, including Epidemiology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Clinical Psychology, and Surgery.

The scientist's research is concentrated on specific topics, notably:

  • Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Cardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy
  • Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
  • Family and Disability Support Research

Kasparian has contributed to numerous papers, several of which have garnered citation attention. Recent publications include:

  • What is the prevalence of fear of cancer recurrence in cancer survivors and patients? A systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis, 2022, Psycho-Oncology
  • Psychological Outcomes and Interventions for Individuals With Congenital Heart Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association, 2022, Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
  • Parenting under pressure: A mixed-methods investigation of the impact of COVID-19 on family life, 2021, Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
  • Health-Related Quality of Life in Children, Adolescents, and Adults With a Fontan Circulation: A Meta-Analysis, 2020, Journal of the American Heart Association
  • Health, wellbeing and lived experiences of adults with SMA: a scoping systematic review, 2020, Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases

Kasparian frequently publishes in venues such as Heart Lung and Circulation, Journal of the American Heart Association, Circulation, Journal of Pediatric Psychology, and Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes. The distribution of their publications shows a sustained focus on cardiovascular and pediatric health-related themes.

Collaboration is a significant aspect of Kasparian's work. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Gary F. Sholler
  • David S. Winlaw
  • Robert Justo
  • Kate Marshall
  • David S. Celermajer

Their interdisciplinary approach integrates clinical psychology and epidemiology with cardiology and pediatric medicine, reflecting a comprehensive perspective on health issues affecting children and adults with congenital heart disease and other complex medical conditions.

Best Publications

  • Skin cancer-related prevention and screening behaviors: a review of the literature.

    Nadine A. Kasparian;Jordana K. McLoone;Bettina Meiser

  • Psychological responses and coping strategies among patients with malignant melanoma: A systematic review of the literature

    Nadine A. Kasparian;Jordana K. McLoone;Phyllis N. Butow

  • Predictors of Sun Protection Behaviors and Severe Sunburn in an International Online Study

    Richard Bränström;Nadine A. Kasparian;Yu-mei Chang;Paul Affleck

  • Psychoeducational Intervention to Reduce Fear of Cancer Recurrence in People at High Risk of Developing Another Primary Melanoma: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial

    Mbathio Dieng;Phyllis N. Butow;Daniel S.J. Costa;Rachael L. Morton

  • Children’s experiences of congenital heart disease: a systematic review of qualitative studies

    Lauren S. H. Chong;Lauren S. H. Chong;Dominic A. Fitzgerald;Jonathan C. Craig;Jonathan C. Craig;Karine E. Manera;Karine E. Manera

  • Genetic testing for melanoma risk: a prospective cohort study of uptake and outcomes among Australian families.

    Nadine A Kasparian;Bettina Meiser;Phyllis N Butow;Judy M Simpson

  • Mental health care for parents of babies with congenital heart disease during intensive care unit admission: Systematic review and statement of best practice.

    Nadine A. Kasparian;Nadine A. Kasparian;Nadine A. Kasparian;Janice M. Kan;Erica Sood;Jo Wray

  • Psychological Wellbeing and Posttraumatic Stress Associated with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Therapy in Young Adults with Genetic Heart Disease

    J. Ingles;J. Ingles;T. Sarina;N. Kasparian;N. Kasparian;C. Semsarian;C. Semsarian;C. Semsarian

  • Assessment of psychosocial outcomes in genetic counseling research: an overview of available measurement scales.

    Nadine A. Kasparian;Claire E. Wakefield;Bettina Meiser

  • Attitudes towards childbearing, causal attributions for bipolar disorder and psychological distress: a study of families with multiple cases of bipolar disorder.

    Bettina Meiser;Philip B. Mitchell;Nadine A. Kasparian;Kim Strong

  • Prenatal counselling for congenital anomalies: a systematic review.

    Sarah Marokakis;Nadine A. Kasparian;Sean E. Kennedy;Sean E. Kennedy

  • Psychological stress and melanoma: are we meeting our patients' psychological needs?

    Nadine Angele Kasparian

  • Economic evaluations of psychosocial interventions in cancer: a systematic review

    Mbathio Dieng;Anne E. Cust;Nadine A. Kasparian;Graham J. Mann

  • Melanoma risk factors, perceived threat and intentional tanning: an international online survey

    Richard Bränström;Yu-Mei Chang;Nadine Kasparian;Paul Affleck

  • Posttraumatic Stress and Prolonged Grief After the Sudden Cardiac Death of a Young Relative.

    Jodie Ingles;Jodie Ingles;Jodie Ingles;Catherine Spinks;Catherine Spinks;Laura Yeates;Laura Yeates;Kevin McGeechan

  • When the Risks Are High: Psychological Adjustment Among Melanoma Survivors at High Risk of Developing New Primary Disease

    Jordana McLoone;Kaaren Watts;Scott Menzies;Bettina Meiser

  • Interdisciplinary psychosocial care for families with inherited cardiovascular diseases

    Colleen Caleshu;Nadine A. Kasparian;Katharine S. Edwards;Laura Yeates;Laura Yeates;Laura Yeates

  • Parenting Under Pressure: A Mixed-Methods Investigation of the Impact of COVID-19 on Family Life

    Kristen A. Chu;Chloe Schwartz;Emily Towner;Nadine A. Kasparian;Nadine A. Kasparian

  • Health‐Related Quality of Life in Children, Adolescents, and Adults With a Fontan Circulation: A Meta‐Analysis

    Kate H. Marshall;Kate H. Marshall;Yves D'Udekem;Gary F. Sholler;Gary F. Sholler;Alexander R. Opotowsky

  • Health, wellbeing and lived experiences of adults with SMA: a scoping systematic review

    Hamish W. Y. Wan;Kate A. Carey;Arlene D’Silva;Steve Vucic

  • Attitudes to genetic testing in families with multiple cases of bipolar disorder.

    Bettina Meiser;Nadine A. Kasparian;Philip B. Mitchell;Kimberly Strong

Frequent Co-Authors

Phyllis Butow
Phyllis Butow University of Sydney
Graham J. Mann
Graham J. Mann Australian National University
Bettina Meiser
Bettina Meiser University of New South Wales
Claire E. Wakefield
Claire E. Wakefield University of New South Wales
David S. Celermajer
David S. Celermajer Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
Christopher Semsarian
Christopher Semsarian University of Sydney
Julia Newton-Bishop
Julia Newton-Bishop University of Leeds
Judy M. Simpson
Judy M. Simpson University of Sydney
Katherine L. Tucker
Katherine L. Tucker University of Massachusetts Lowell
Jane W. Newburger
Jane W. Newburger Boston Children's Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing the right psychology program is crucial for both your academic experience and financial well-being. Prospective students should explore affordable online psychology degrees, as these options make it easier to balance tuition costs and long-term career goals.

Many states offer accessible programs. For example, the cheapest psychology degrees in California provide excellent value for students in the western U.S. Similarly, those looking into southeastern options should review the affordable psychology programs in Florida. In Texas, prospective students can consider the cheapest psychology programs in Houston for quality education at a competitive price.

The Midwest also presents valuable choices, such as the cheapest psychology programs in Illinois. Regardless of location, these affordable degrees can lead to careers in counseling, research, human resources, or social work. Exploring these pathways ensures students can pursue meaningful professions without the burden of excessive debt.

Best Scientists Citing Nadine A. Kasparian

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles