World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
107
Citations
41986
World Ranking
6257
National Ranking
606

David W. P. Thomas publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David W. P. Thomas sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 683 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

David W. P. Thomas D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David W. P. Thomas sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 107 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

David W. P. Thomas is affiliated with the University of Nottingham in the United Kingdom. Their research focuses primarily within the field of Engineering, with a strong emphasis on Electrical and Electronic Engineering. Additional subfields include Control and Systems Engineering, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Computer Networks and Communications, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging.

The scientist's work spans several key topics in engineering and energy systems. These include:

  • Electromagnetic Compatibility and Noise Suppression
  • Power Line Communications and Noise
  • Electromagnetic Compatibility and Measurements
  • Microgrid Control and Optimization
  • Smart Grid Energy Management
  • Silicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies
  • Electrical Fault Detection and Protection

David W. P. Thomas has published extensively in various academic venues. Frequent publication venues for their research are:

  • IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility
  • Energies
  • IEEE Access
  • Applied Energy
  • Sustainable Energy Grids and Networks

Some of their recent research papers include:

  • A hierarchical two-stage energy management for a home microgrid using model predictive and real-time controllers, 2020, Applied Energy
  • Techno-Economic Sizing of a community battery to provide community energy billing and additional ancillary services, 2021, Sustainable Energy Grids and Networks
  • Performance Assessment of an Energy Management System for a Home Microgrid with PV Generation, 2020, Energies
  • Analysis of Electrified Systems and Electromagnetic Interference on the Railways, 2023, IEEE Letters on Electromagnetic Compatibility Practice and Applications
  • On Spread Spectrum for DC Grids: Low-Frequency Conducted EMI Mitigation and Signal Integrity Disruption in Serial Communication Links, 2023, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility

The scientist has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Mark Sumner
  • Steve Greedy
  • Mahmoud Elkazaz
  • Angel Peña-Quintal
  • Arun D. Khilnani

Best Publications

  • The Hippo pathway and human cancer

    Kieran F. Harvey;Xiaomeng Zhang;Xiaomeng Zhang;David M. Thomas;David M. Thomas

  • CTLA4-Ig and anti-CD40 ligand prevent renal allograft rejection in primates

    Allan D. Kirk;David M. Harlan;Nicholas N. Armstrong;Thomas A. Davis

  • Translational biology of osteosarcoma

    Maya Kansara;Michele W. Teng;Mark J. Smyth;David M. Thomas

  • Denosumab in patients with giant-cell tumour of bone: an open-label, phase 2 study

    David Thomas;Robert Henshaw;Keith M Skubitz;Sant Chawla

  • The distinctive biology of cancer in adolescents and young adults

    Archie Bleyer;Ronald Barr;Brandon Hayes-Lattin;David Thomas

  • Safety and efficacy of denosumab for adults and skeletally mature adolescents with giant cell tumour of bone: interim analysis of an open-label, parallel-group, phase 2 study.

    Sant Chawla;Robert Henshaw;Leanne Seeger;Edwin Choy

  • Levels of Matrix Metalloproteases in Bladder Cancer Correlate with Tumor Grade and Invasion

    Bernard Davies;Jonathan Waxman;Harpret Wasan;Paul Abel

  • A review of the scientific evidence for biofilms in wounds

    Steven L. Percival;Katja E. Hill;David Wynne Williams;Samuel J. Hooper

  • Effective dose from cone beam CT examinations in dentistry

    J. Roberts;Nicholas Drage;J. Davies;David William Thomas

  • Randomized Trial of a Slow-Release Versus a Standard Formulation of Cytarabine for the Intrathecal Treatment of Lymphomatous Meningitis

    Michael J. Glantz;Suzanne LaFollette;Kurt A. Jaeckle;William Shapiro

  • Denosumab Induces Tumor Reduction and Bone Formation in Patients with Giant-Cell Tumor of Bone

    Dan Branstetter;Scott D. Nelson;J. Carlos Manivel;Jean-Yves Blay

  • The Retinoblastoma Protein Acts as a Transcriptional Coactivator Required for Osteogenic Differentiation

    David M. Thomas;Shannon A. Carty;Denise M. Piscopo;Jong Seo Lee

  • A review of the microbiology, antibiotic usage and resistance in chronic skin wounds

    R. S. Howell-Jones;Melanie Wilson;Katja E. Hill;A. J. Howard

  • Tissue specific regulation of VEGF expression during bone development requires Cbfa1/Runx2.

    Elazar Zelzer;Donald J. Glotzer;Christine Hartmann;David Thomas

  • Risperidone, haloperidol, and placebo in the treatment of aggressive challenging behaviour in patients with intellectual disability: a randomised controlled trial

    Peter Tyrer;Patricia C. Oliver-Africano;Zed Ahmed;Nick Bouras

  • High resolution melting analysis for the rapid and sensitive detection of mutations in clinical samples: KRAS codon 12 and 13 mutations in non-small cell lung cancer.

    Michael Krypuy;Genni M Newnham;Genni M Newnham;David M Thomas;David M Thomas;Matthew Conron

  • Pexidartinib versus placebo for advanced tenosynovial giant cell tumour (ENLIVEN): a randomised phase 3 trial.

    William D Tap;Hans Gelderblom;Emanuela Palmerini;Jayesh Desai

  • FGFR Genetic Alterations Predict for Sensitivity to NVP-BGJ398, a Selective Pan-FGFR Inhibitor

    Vito Guagnano;Audrey Kauffmann;Simon Wöhrle;Christelle Stamm

  • Clinical Overview of MDM2/X-Targeted Therapies

    Andrew Burgess;Kee Ming Chia;Sue Haupt;David Thomas;David Thomas

  • Molecular pathogenesis of osteosarcoma.

    Maya Kansara;David M. Thomas

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark Sumner
Mark Sumner University of Nottingham
Christos Christopoulos
Christos Christopoulos University of Nottingham
Mark J. Cowley
Mark J. Cowley Garvan Institute of Medical Research
Trevor M. Benson
Trevor M. Benson University of Nottingham
Sharon A. Savage
Sharon A. Savage National Institutes of Health
Keith Harding
Keith Harding Cardiff University
Piero Picci
Piero Picci University of Bologna
Phyllis Butow
Phyllis Butow University of Sydney
Jean-Yves Blay
Jean-Yves Blay Claude Bernard University Lyon 1
Bettina Meiser
Bettina Meiser University of New South Wales

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative online degrees and career pathways can be an excellent way to enter the medical field or advance your current qualifications. Many prospective students are seeking programs that offer flexibility, efficiency, and specialization, especially those balancing work or family commitments.

For those already holding a master’s degree in nursing, the shortest post master's dnp program options allow you to quickly earn a terminal degree in nursing. If your goal is to find a more manageable workload, there are also easiest online dnp programs designed for working professionals seeking advanced credentials without excessive rigor.

Those looking for a faster entry into patient care roles may consider fast track medical programs, which help you become a Licensed Practical Nurse swiftly through condensed online study. Additionally, mental health is a growing field; the psychiatric np programs provide accelerated pathways to become a psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner.

These options represent a range of online avenues that align with various interests and career goals within medicine, offering flexibility and faster routes to licensure or specialization.

Best Scientists Citing David W. P. Thomas

Trending Scientists