World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Julia Newton-Bishop

Julia Newton-Bishop

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
62
Citations
13647
World Ranking
10806
National Ranking
830

Julia Newton-Bishop publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julia Newton-Bishop sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 209 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Julia Newton-Bishop D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julia Newton-Bishop sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Julia Newton-Bishop is affiliated with the University of Leeds in the United Kingdom. Their research activity spans multiple core disciplines, primarily focusing on biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine. They have contributed extensively to subfields including molecular biology, oncology, immunology, cell biology, and cancer research.

Their research addresses key topics such as cutaneous melanoma detection and management, immunotherapy and immune responses, melanoma and MAPK pathways, cancer immunotherapy and biomarkers, melanin and skin pigmentation, artificial intelligence applications in cancer detection, and cell image analysis techniques.

Frequent publication venues where Julia Newton-Bishop's work appears include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Cancer Research, Cancer Discovery, Nature Medicine, and the Journal of Clinical Oncology. This distribution reflects an emphasis on both preclinical biological studies and clinical oncology research.

Some of their recent scientific papers include the following:

  • "Cross-cohort gut microbiome associations with immune checkpoint inhibitor response in advanced melanoma," 2022, Nature Medicine
  • "Longitudinal gut microbiome changes in immune checkpoint blockade-treated advanced melanoma," 2024, Nature Medicine
  • "Cooperation between melanoma cell states promotes metastasis through heterotypic cluster formation," 2021, Developmental Cell
  • "Factors Affecting Sentinel Node Metastasis in Thin (T1) Cutaneous Melanomas: Development and External Validation of a Predictive Nomogram," 2020, Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • "Gain-of-Function Genetic Alterations of G9a Drive Oncogenesis," 2020, Cancer Discovery

Julia Newton-Bishop has established collaborations with several frequent co-authors, including Jérémie Nsengimana, D. Timothy Bishop, Mark Harland, David J. Adams, and Susana Puig. These partnerships have contributed to a body of work spanning experimental cancer biology, clinical research, and biomarker development.

Best Publications

  • The association of use of sunbeds with cutaneous malignant melanoma and other skin cancers: A systematic review

    Adele Green;Philippe Autier;Mathieu Boniol;Peter Boyle

  • Excision margins in high-risk malignant melanoma.

    J. Meirion Thomas;Julia Newton-Bishop;Roger A'Hern;Gill Coombes

  • A novel recurrent mutation in MITF predisposes to familial and sporadic melanoma

    Satoru Yokoyama;Susan L. Woods;Glen M. Boyle;Lauren G. Aoude

  • Diagnosis and treatment of melanoma. European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline – Update 2012

    Claus Garbe;Ketty Peris;Axel Hauschild;Philippe Saiag

  • Revised U.K. guidelines for the management of cutaneous melanoma 2010.

    J.R. Marsden;J.A. Newton-Bishop;L. Burrows;M. Cook

  • POT1 loss-of-function variants predispose to familial melanoma

    Carla Daniela Robles-Espinoza;Mark Harland;Andrew J Ramsay;Lauren G Aoude

  • Diagnosis and treatment of melanoma: European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline

    Claus Garbe;Ketty Peris;Axel Hauschild;Philippe Saiag

  • Sun exposure and melanoma risk at different latitudes: a pooled analysis of 5700 cases and 7216 controls

    Yu Mei Chang;Jennifer H. Barrett;Timothy D. Bishop;Bruce K. Armstrong

  • Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3 Levels Are Associated With Breslow Thickness at Presentation and Survival From Melanoma

    Julia A. Newton-Bishop;Samantha Beswick;Juliette Randerson-Moor;Yu-Mei Chang

  • A road map for efficient and reliable human genome epidemiology.

    John P A Ioannidis;John P A Ioannidis;Marta Gwinn;Julian Little;Julian P T Higgins

  • Revised UK guidelines for the management of cutaneous melanoma 2010

    J R Marsden;J A Newton-Bishop;L Burrows;M Cook

  • Selection criteria for genetic assessment of patients with familial melanoma

    Sancy A. Leachman;John Carucci;Wendy Kohlmann;Kimberly C. Banks

  • Prognosis in Patients With Sentinel Node–Positive Melanoma Is Accurately Defined by the Combined Rotterdam Tumor Load and Dewar Topography Criteria

    Augustinus P.T. van der Ploeg;Alexander C.J. van Akkooi;Piotr Rutkowski;Zbigniew I. Nowecki

  • Comprehensive Study of the Clinical Phenotype of Germline BAP1 Variant-Carrying Families Worldwide

    Sebastian Walpole;Sebastian Walpole;Antonia L. Pritchard;Antonia L. Pritchard;Colleen M. Cebulla;Robert Pilarski

  • Desmoplastic malignant melanoma: a systematic review.

    M B Lens;J A Newton-Bishop;A P Boon

  • Nonsense Mutations in the Shelterin Complex Genes ACD and TERF2IP in Familial Melanoma

    Lauren G Aoude;Antonia L Pritchard;Carla Daniela Robles-Espinoza;Karin Wadt

  • Genome-wide association study identifies a new melanoma susceptibility locus at 1q21.3

    Stuart MacGregor;Grant W Montgomery;Jimmy Z Liu;Zhen Zhen Zhao

  • Genome-wide association meta-analyses combining multiple risk phenotypes provide insights into the genetic architecture of cutaneous melanoma susceptibility

    Maria Teresa Landi;D. Timothy Bishop;Stuart MacGregor

  • Naevi and pigmentary characteristics as risk factors for melanoma in a high‐risk population: A case‐control study in new South Wales, Australia

    Andrew E. Grulich;Veronique Bataille;Anthony J. Swerdlow;Julia A. Newton-Bishop

  • Melanoma prone families with CDK4 germline mutation: phenotypic profile and associations with MC1R variants

    Hanne Eknes Puntervoll;Xiaohong R. Yang;Hildegunn Hoøberg Vetti;Ingeborg M. Bachmann;Ingeborg M. Bachmann

Frequent Co-Authors

D. Timothy Bishop
D. Timothy Bishop University of Leeds
Nelleke A. Gruis
Nelleke A. Gruis Leiden University Medical Center
Jennifer H. Barrett
Jennifer H. Barrett University of Leeds
Susana Puig
Susana Puig University of Barcelona
Nicholas K. Hayward
Nicholas K. Hayward QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
Graham J. Mann
Graham J. Mann Australian National University
Maria Teresa Landi
Maria Teresa Landi National Institutes of Health
David J. Adams
David J. Adams Wellcome Sanger Institute
Mark M. Iles
Mark M. Iles University of Leeds
Håkan Olsson
Håkan Olsson Lund University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re planning to study Biology or Biochemistry in the USA, it’s helpful to know about related online degrees and emerging career pathways. One area to consider is health informatics. For example, many students explore careers in medical billing and coding. Learning is medical billing and coding worth it can help you decide if this growing field aligns with your interests and career goals.

Another popular option is to pursue health information management online programs. These degrees prepare you for in-demand roles that keep healthcare facilities running smoothly. If you’re interested in nutrition, be sure to research the cost of masters degree in nutrition to determine if this specialization fits your budget and career goals.

For those interested in diagnostic imaging, ultrasound tech online programs offer a flexible way to enter this rewarding profession. Each of these related areas can complement a background in Biology or Biochemistry, opening doors to diverse and meaningful careers in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Julia Newton-Bishop

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles