World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jennifer H. Barrett

Jennifer H. Barrett

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 76 18622 17494 1683 1611 252 32920

Jennifer H. Barrett publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jennifer H. Barrett between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jennifer H. Barrett published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 9.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 44 publications in 2023. 6 of the 311 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 44. Peak 44 publications in 2023. 1992: 2 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 6 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 10 publications 2000: 11 publications 2001: 12 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 19 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 44 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 3 publications
1992 2025

311 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jennifer H. Barrett: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 2
1993 0
1994 1
1995 6
1996 5
1997 2
1998 8
1999 10
2000 11
2001 12
2002 10
2003 10
2004 5
2005 11
2006 7
2007 10
2008 13
2009 13
2010 11
2011 19
2012 8
2013 13
2014 13
2015 8
2016 8
2017 7
2018 9
2019 7
2020 10
2021 5
2022 7
2023 44
2024 3
2025 3
Total 311
Download as CSV

Jennifer H. Barrett publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jennifer H. Barrett sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 241–260 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 252 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545 252
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Jennifer H. Barrett D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jennifer H. Barrett sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 76–77 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730 76
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jennifer H. Barrett is affiliated with the University of Leeds in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily lies within the field of Medicine, with a strong focus on Ophthalmology and related subfields such as Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Molecular Biology, Genetics, and Pathology and Forensic Medicine.

The scientist's work covers a variety of topics including Glaucoma and retinal disorders, Retinal Diseases and Treatments, Retinal Imaging and Analysis, Vasculitis and related conditions, Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research, and Muscle metabolism and nutrition.

Recent publications highlight their contributions to understanding disease mechanisms and diagnostic imaging in ophthalmology and neurology. Notable papers include:

  • A foundation model for generalizable disease detection from retinal images, 2023, Nature
  • Massively parallel reporter assays of melanoma risk variants identify MX2 as a gene promoting melanoma, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Retinal Optical Coherence Tomography Features Associated With Incident and Prevalent Parkinson Disease, 2023, Neurology
  • Retinal asymmetry in multiple sclerosis, 2020, Brain
  • Genome-wide association meta-analysis of corneal curvature identifies novel loci and shared genetic influences across axial length and refractive error, 2020, Communications Biology

Jennifer H. Barrett frequently collaborates with other researchers. Key coauthors include Paul J. Foster, Anthony P. Khawaja, Sarah Mackie, Praveen J. Patel, and Sharon Chua, reflecting ongoing collaborative efforts in their scientific endeavors.

Their work has appeared multiple times in several publication venues, notably:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • British Journal of Dermatology
  • Nature Communications
  • Ophthalmology Glaucoma
  • JAMA Ophthalmology

Best Publications

  • Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls

    Paul R. Burton;David G. Clayton;Lon R. Cardon;Nick Craddock

  • Genomewide association analysis of coronary artery disease.

    Nilesh J. Samani;Jeanette Erdmann;Alistair S. Hall;Christian Hengstenberg

  • Genome-wide association study identifies eight loci associated with blood pressure

    Christopher Newton-Cheh;Christopher Newton-Cheh;Toby Johnson;Toby Johnson;Vesela Gateva;Martin D. Tobin

  • Association scan of 14,500 nonsynonymous SNPs in four diseases identifies autoimmunity variants

    Paul R Burton;David G Clayton;Lon R Cardon;Nick Craddock

  • KRAS and BRAF Mutations in Advanced Colorectal Cancer Are Associated With Poor Prognosis but Do Not Preclude Benefit From Oxaliplatin or Irinotecan: Results From the MRC FOCUS Trial

    Susan D. Richman;Matthew T. Seymour;Philip Chambers;Faye Elliott

  • Localization of type 1 diabetes susceptibility to the MHC class I genes HLA-B and HLA-A

    Sergey Nejentsev;Joanna M. M. Howson;Neil M. Walker;Jeffrey Szeszko

  • Genome-wide association study identifies three loci associated with melanoma risk.

    D Timothy Bishop;Florence Demenais;Mark M Iles;Mark Harland

  • Genetic linkage studies

    M Dawn Teare;Jennifer H Barrett

  • Predictive Biomarkers of Chemotherapy Efficacy in Colorectal Cancer: Results From the UK MRC FOCUS Trial

    Michael S. Braun;Susan D. Richman;Philip Quirke;Catherine Daly

  • A pharmacogenetic study to investigate the role of dietary carcinogens in the etiology of colorectal cancer.

    Christoph Sachse;Gillian Smith;Murray J.V. Wilkie;Jennifer H. Barrett

  • Sun exposure and melanoma risk at different latitudes: a pooled analysis of 5700 cases and 7216 controls

    Yu Mei Chang;Jennifer H. Barrett;Timothy D. Bishop;Bruce K. Armstrong

  • Why do women use dietary supplements? The use of the theory of planned behaviour to explore beliefs about their use

    Mark Conner;Sara F.L Kirk;Janet E Cade;Jennifer H Barrett

  • Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3 Levels Are Associated With Breslow Thickness at Presentation and Survival From Melanoma

    Julia A. Newton-Bishop;Samantha Beswick;Juliette Randerson-Moor;Yu-Mei Chang

  • Does rheumatoid arthritis remit during pregnancy and relapse postpartum? Results from a nationwide study in the United Kingdom performed prospectively from late pregnancy.

    Jennifer H. Barrett;Paul Brennan;Magdalen Fiddler;Alan J. Silman

  • Genome-wide association study identifies three new melanoma susceptibility loci

    Jennifer H. Barrett;Mark M. Iles;Mark Harland;John C. Taylor

  • Environmental Influences: Factors Influencing a Woman’s Decision to Use Dietary Supplements

    Mark Conner;Sara F. L. Kirk;Janet E. Cade;Jennifer H. Barrett

  • Influences of Blood Sample Processing on Low–Molecular-Weight Proteome Identified by Surface-Enhanced Laser Desorption/Ionization Mass Spectrometry

    Rosamonde E. Banks;Anthea J. Stanley;David A. Cairns;Jennifer H. Barrett

  • Genome-wide association study identifies novel loci predisposing to cutaneous melanoma

    Christopher I. Amos;Li-E Wang;Jeffrey E. Lee;Jeffrey E. Gershenwald

  • Juvenile idiopathic arthritis classified by the ILAR criteria: HLA associations in UK patients

    W. Thomson;J. H. Barrett;R. Donn;L. Pepper

  • Polymorphisms in the cytochrome P450 CYP1A2 gene (CYP1A2) in colorectal cancer patients and controls: allele frequencies, linkage disequilibrium and influence on caffeine metabolism.

    Christoph Sachse;Upinder Bhambra;Gillian Smith;Tracy J. Lightfoot

Frequent Co-Authors

D. Timothy Bishop
D. Timothy Bishop University of Leeds
Mark M. Iles
Mark M. Iles University of Leeds
Julia Newton-Bishop
Julia Newton-Bishop University of Leeds
Ann W. Morgan
Ann W. Morgan University of Leeds
Jane Worthington
Jane Worthington University of Manchester
Paul Emery
Paul Emery University of Leeds
Alan J. Silman
Alan J. Silman University of Oxford
Graham J. Mann
Graham J. Mann Australian National University
Anne Barton
Anne Barton University of Manchester
Nicholas K. Hayward
Nicholas K. Hayward QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in medicine but exploring alternative or more flexible paths, there are several affordable online healthcare degrees worth considering. For those seeking a pharmacy career, an online pharmd can prepare you for new opportunities without disrupting your current commitments.

Professionals looking to advance in the management of healthcare data can opt for an online mhi (Master of Health Information), which focuses on modern health IT systems and compliance.

Those who prefer administrative roles may benefit from medical billing and coding online courses. These programs can lead to in-demand positions working with insurance claims and patient records.

Nursing professionals seeking to broaden their practice and autonomy can explore affordable np programs that help nurses qualify as nurse practitioners.

These online degrees not only offer more affordable alternatives to traditional medical education but also help diversify career pathways in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Jennifer H. Barrett

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles