World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 78 1671 1589 57 55 270 32490

Graham J. Mann publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Graham J. Mann between 1985 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Graham J. Mann published across 41 years, from 1985 to 2025, averaging 14.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 212 publications in 2023. 49 of the 596 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
50 100 150 200
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 212. Peak 212 publications in 2023. 1985: 1 publication 1986: 2 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 2 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 4 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 10 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 24 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 21 publications 2018: 22 publications 2019: 22 publications 2020: 26 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 18 publications 2023: 212 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 36 publications
1985 2025

596 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Graham J. Mann: publications per year, 1985 to 2025
Year Publications
1985 1
1986 2
1987 1
1988 2
1989 0
1990 3
1991 2
1992 1
1993 4
1994 3
1995 2
1996 0
1997 10
1998 2
1999 4
2000 3
2001 6
2002 3
2003 8
2004 3
2005 5
2006 9
2007 7
2008 9
2009 10
2010 7
2011 15
2012 13
2013 17
2014 17
2015 24
2016 15
2017 21
2018 22
2019 22
2020 26
2021 18
2022 18
2023 212
2024 13
2025 36
Total 596
Download as CSV

Graham J. Mann publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Graham J. Mann sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 265–274 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 270 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88 270
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

Graham J. Mann D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Graham J. Mann sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 78–79 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127 78
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Graham J. Mann is affiliated with the Australian National University in Australia. Their research spans multiple domains within biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine, with a significant focus on oncology and cancer research.

Their recent publications include:

  • FinnGen provides genetic insights from a well-phenotyped isolated population, 2023, Nature
  • Hematopoietic mosaic chromosomal alterations increase the risk for diverse types of infection, 2021, Nature Medicine
  • Pathology of Tumors Associated With Pathogenic Germline Variants in 9 Breast Cancer Susceptibility Genes, 2022, JAMA Oncology
  • Whole-genome sequencing of acral melanoma reveals genomic complexity and diversity, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Multiomic profiling of checkpoint inhibitor-treated melanoma: Identifying predictors of response and resistance, and markers of biological discordance, 2021, Cancer Cell

Their work is concentrated in the following main fields of study:

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Medicine

Subfields of study reflect their focused expertise and include:

  • Oncology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetics
  • Cancer Research
  • Immunology

Key topics explored in their research cover a range of cancer-related aspects and biomedical themes:

  • Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
  • BRCA gene mutations in cancer
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Immunotherapy and Immune Responses

Graham J. Mann frequently publishes in several specialized venues, indicating established engagement with the scientific community in their areas of study. These include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nature Communications
  • Nature
  • British Journal of Dermatology
  • Scientific Reports

Among their frequent co-authors are:

  • Richard A. Scolyer
  • Anne Ε. Cust
  • James S. Wilmott
  • Manjeet K. Bolla
  • Stig E. Bojesen

Best Publications

  • Pan-cancer analysis of whole genomes

    Peter J. Campbell;Gad Getz;Jan O. Korbel;Joshua M. Stuart

  • Genomic Classification of Cutaneous Melanoma

    Rehan Akbani;Kadir C. Akdemir;B. Arman Aksoy;Monique Albert

  • Cell-of-Origin Patterns Dominate the Molecular Classification of 10,000 Tumors from 33 Types of Cancer.

    Katherine A. Hoadley;Christina Yau;Christina Yau;Toshinori Hinoue;Denise M. Wolf

  • Whole-genome landscapes of major melanoma subtypes

    Nicholas K. Hayward;Nicholas K. Hayward;James S. Wilmott;Nicola Waddell;Nicola Waddell;Peter A. Johansson

  • Prognostic and Clinicopathologic Associations of Oncogenic BRAF in Metastatic Melanoma

    Georgina V. Long;Alexander M. Menzies;Adnan M. Nagrial;Lauren E. Haydu

  • Genomic and Functional Approaches to Understanding Cancer Aneuploidy

    Alison M. Taylor;Alison M. Taylor;Juliann Shih;Gavin Ha;Gavin Ha;Galen F. Gao

  • Patterns of somatic structural variation in human cancer genomes

    Yilong Li;Nicola D Roberts;Jeremiah A Wala;Jeremiah A Wala;Ofer Shapira;Ofer Shapira

  • Geographical Variation in the Penetrance of CDKN2A Mutations for Melanoma

    D. Timothy Bishop;Florence Demenais;Alisa M. Goldstein;Wilma Bergman

  • Erratum: Comprehensive Characterization of Cancer Driver Genes and Mutations (ARTICLE (2018) 173(2) (371–385), (S009286741830237X), (10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.060))

    Matthew H. Bailey;Collin Tokheim;Eduard Porta-Pardo;Sohini Sengupta

  • A novel recurrent mutation in MITF predisposes to familial and sporadic melanoma

    Satoru Yokoyama;Susan L. Woods;Glen M. Boyle;Lauren G. Aoude

  • Genome-wide association study identifies three loci associated with melanoma risk.

    D Timothy Bishop;Florence Demenais;Mark M Iles;Mark Harland

  • Features associated with germline CDKN2A mutations: a GenoMEL study of melanoma‐prone families from three continents

    Alisa M Goldstein;May Chan;Mark Harland;Nicholas K Hayward

  • High-risk Melanoma Susceptibility Genes and Pancreatic Cancer, Neural System Tumors, and Uveal Melanoma across GenoMEL

    Alisa M. Goldstein;May Chan;Mark Harland;Elizabeth M. Gillanders

  • Dominant Negative ATM Mutations in Breast Cancer Families

    Georgia Chenevix-Trench;Amanda B. Spurdle;Magtouf Gatei;Helena Kelly

  • Pan-cancer Alterations of the MYC Oncogene and Its Proximal Network across the Cancer Genome Atlas

    Franz X. Schaub;Varsha Dhankani;Ashton C. Berger;Mihir Trivedi

  • Genomic, Pathway Network, and Immunologic Features Distinguishing Squamous Carcinomas

    Joshua D. Campbell;Joshua D. Campbell;Joshua D. Campbell;Christina Yau;Christina Yau;Reanne Bowlby;Yuexin Liu

  • UV-associated mutations underlie the etiology of MCV-negative Merkel cell carcinomas

    Stephen Q. Wong;Kelly Waldeck;Ismael A. Vergara;Jan Schröder;Jan Schröder;Jan Schröder

  • Circulating tumour DNA predicts response to anti-PD1 antibodies in metastatic melanoma.

    J.H. Lee;J.H. Lee;J.H. Lee;G.V. Long;S. Boyd;S. Lo

  • Genome-wide association study identifies three new melanoma susceptibility loci

    Jennifer H. Barrett;Mark M. Iles;Mark Harland;John C. Taylor

  • Common sequence variants on 20q11.22 confer melanoma susceptibility

    Kevin M. Brown;Stuart MacGregor;Grant W. Montgomery;David W. Craig

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard A. Scolyer
Richard A. Scolyer Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
Richard F. Kefford
Richard F. Kefford Macquarie University
Nicholas K. Hayward
Nicholas K. Hayward QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
John F. Thompson
John F. Thompson University of Sydney
Georgina V. Long
Georgina V. Long University of Sydney
James S. Wilmott
James S. Wilmott University of Sydney
John L. Hopper
John L. Hopper University of Melbourne
Nadine A. Kasparian
Nadine A. Kasparian Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Graham G. Giles
Graham G. Giles University of Melbourne
Susana Puig
Susana Puig University of Barcelona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Genetics can open doors to a range of online degree and certification options that complement or accelerate your career path. Specialized fields like bioinformatics, healthcare management, and data analysis often benefit from flexible online learning formats.

For those interested in medical administration, exploring the best accredited medical billing and coding schools online can be a practical step. Many universities now offer fast track programs, perfect for students aiming to earn a degree in less time and launch their careers quickly.

Flexibility is key for many genetics students, so enrolling in self paced college courses may be ideal for balancing studies with research or work. Additionally, cost-conscious applicants may want to review the best online colleges with no application fee to simplify the application process and reduce expenses.

These varied online pathways make genetics education more accessible, adaptable, and affordable than ever before.

Best Scientists Citing Graham J. Mann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles