World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
68
Citations
18941
World Ranking
7711
National Ranking
3515

Alexey Khodjakov publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alexey Khodjakov sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 131 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Alexey Khodjakov D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alexey Khodjakov sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alexey Khodjakov is affiliated with the New York State Department of Health in the United States. Their research focuses primarily within the broad disciplines of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with a substantial body of work spanning several subfields including Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, and Genetics. Additional contributions cover Immunology and Civil and Structural Engineering.

The scientist has contributed extensively to key research areas, notably:

  • Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Cellular transport and secretion
  • Nuclear Structure and Function
  • Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
  • Genetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases
  • Mitochondrial Function and Pathology

Several recent research articles by Alexey Khodjakov include:

  • Non-centrosomal microtubules at kinetochores promote rapid chromosome biorientation during mitosis in human cells, 2022, published in Current Biology
  • Tension promotes kinetochore-microtubule release by Aurora B kinase, 2021, published in The Journal of Cell Biology
  • Cell Cycle-Dependent Dynamics of the Golgi-Centrosome Association in Motile Cells, 2020, published in Cells
  • Role of spatial patterns and kinetochore architecture in spindle morphogenesis, 2021, published in Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology
  • A tubule-sheet continuum model for the mechanism of nuclear envelope assembly, 2023, published in Developmental Cell

Their research has been disseminated through multiple publication venues, indicating a focus on peer review and scientific discourse in biomedical literature and cell biology. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Faculty Opinions - Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Current Biology
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Collaboration features prominently in Alexey Khodjakov's research profile. Frequent co-authors working alongside them include:

  • Fioranna Renda
  • Irina Tikhonenko
  • Christopher E. Miles
  • Lina Carlini
  • Tarun M. Kapoor

Best Publications

  • The checkpoint delaying anaphase in response to chromosome monoorientation is mediated by an inhibitory signal produced by unattached kinetochores.

    Conly L. Rieder;Richard W. Cole;Alexey Khodjakov;Greenfield Sluder

  • Flies without Centrioles

    Renata Basto;Joyce Lau;Tatiana Vinogradova;Tatiana Vinogradova;Alejandra Gardiol

  • Merotelic kinetochore orientation is a major mechanism of aneuploidy in mitotic mammalian tissue cells

    Daniela Cimini;Bonnie Howell;Paul Maddox;Alexey Khodjakov

  • Centrosome Amplification Can Initiate Tumorigenesis in Flies

    Renata Basto;Kathrin Brunk;Tatiana Vinadogrova;Tatiana Vinadogrova;Nina Peel;Nina Peel

  • Centrosome-independent mitotic spindle formation in vertebrates

    Alexey Khodjakov;Alexey Khodjakov;Richard W. Cole;Berl R. Oakley;Conly L. Rieder;Conly L. Rieder

  • Asymmetric CLASP-Dependent Nucleation of Noncentrosomal Microtubules at the trans-Golgi Network

    Andrey Efimov;Alexey Kharitonov;Nadia Efimova;Jadranka Loncarek

  • Correcting improper chromosome-spindle attachments during cell division.

    Michael A Lampson;Kishore Renduchitala;Alexey Khodjakov;Tarun M Kapoor

  • The respective contributions of the mother and daughter centrioles to centrosome activity and behavior in vertebrate cells.

    Matthieu Piel;Pablo Meyer;Alexey Khodjakov;Conly L. Rieder

  • Chromosomes Can Congress to the Metaphase Plate Before Biorientation

    Tarun M. Kapoor;Michael A. Lampson;Polla Hergert;Lisa Cameron;Lisa Cameron

  • Requirement of a Centrosomal Activity for Cell Cycle Progression Through G1 into S Phase

    Edward H. Hinchcliffe;Frederick J. Miller;Matthew Cham;Alexey L. Khodjakov

  • Centriole Disassembly In Vivo and Its Effect on Centrosome Structure and Function in Vertebrate Cells

    Y. Bobinnec;A. Khodjakov;L.M. Mir;C.L. Rieder

  • The Sudden Recruitment of γ-Tubulin to the Centrosome at the Onset of Mitosis and Its Dynamic Exchange Throughout the Cell Cycle, Do Not Require Microtubules

    Alexey Khodjakov;Alexey Khodjakov;Conly L. Rieder;Conly L. Rieder

  • Centrosomes Enhance the Fidelity of Cytokinesis in Vertebrates and Are Required for Cell Cycle Progression

    Alexey Khodjakov;Conly L. Rieder;Conly L. Rieder

  • Regulated HsSAS-6 Levels Ensure Formation of a Single Procentriole per Centriole during the Centrosome Duplication Cycle

    Petr Strnad;Sebastian Leidel;Tatiana Vinogradova;Ursula Euteneuer

  • Kinetochore-driven formation of kinetochore fibers contributes to spindle assembly during animal mitosis

    Helder Maiato;Conly L. Rieder;Conly L. Rieder;Conly L. Rieder;Alexey Khodjakov;Alexey Khodjakov;Alexey Khodjakov

  • The spatial arrangement of chromosomes during prometaphase facilitates spindle assembly

    Valentin Magidson;Christopher B. O'Connell;Jadranka Lončarek;Raja Paul

  • Depletion of centromeric MCAK leads to chromosome congression and segregation defects due to improper kinetochore attachments.

    Susan L. Kline-Smith;Alexey Khodjakov;Polla Hergert;Claire E. Walczak

  • Mechanisms of chromosome behaviour during mitosis.

    Claire E. Walczak;Shang Cai;Alexey Khodjakov

  • Overly long centrioles and defective cell division upon excess of the SAS-4-related protein CPAP.

    Gregor Kohlmaier;Jadranka Lončarek;Xing Meng;Bruce F. McEwen

  • The centrosome in vertebrates: more than a microtubule-organizing center

    Conly L Rieder;Shamsa Faruki;Alexey Khodjakov

Frequent Co-Authors

Conly L. Rieder
Conly L. Rieder New York State Department of Health
Tarun M. Kapoor
Tarun M. Kapoor Rockefeller University
Fred Chang
Fred Chang University of California, San Francisco
Helder Maiato
Helder Maiato University of Porto
David Pellman
David Pellman Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Michael A. Lampson
Michael A. Lampson University of Pennsylvania
Pierre Gönczy
Pierre Gönczy École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Alex Mogilner
Alex Mogilner Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
Jordan W. Raff
Jordan W. Raff University of Oxford
Claire E. Walczak
Claire E. Walczak Indiana University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students pursuing Biology and Biochemistry in the USA have a range of online degree options and career pathways to consider. One growing field is health information management, which offers flexible learning options. If you’re seeking affordability without compromising quality, explore some of the health information management online degree programs available.

Certification is another crucial step in advancing your career. Comparing ccs certification with other credentials can help you understand the differences, associated costs, and potential salary prospects. Those interested in entering the workforce quickly might consider a career in medical coding.

Becoming a certified medical coder is a popular option, and understanding the certified medical coder salary can help you make informed choices about your educational investment. Before choosing this pathway, it’s wise to weigh the medical billing and coding job outlook and consider both the advantages and challenges in the industry.

Exploring these related certifications and degrees can open diverse and rewarding career options for science students beyond traditional laboratory roles.

Best Scientists Citing Alexey Khodjakov

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles