World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
122
Citations
45401
World Ranking
592
National Ranking
378

Edward D. Salmon publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edward D. Salmon sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 263 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Edward D. Salmon D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edward D. Salmon sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 122 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Edward D. Salmon is affiliated with the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a specialized focus on Cell Biology and Molecular Biology, alongside work in Plant Science, Biomaterials, and Materials Chemistry.

The scientist's work covers several key topics, including:

  • Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Mitochondrial Function and Pathology
  • Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
  • Micro and Nano Robotics
  • Nuclear Structure and Function

The publication record features a concentration of outputs in the UNC Libraries venue, with 25 publications credited. Representative recent papers include:

  • How the kinetochore couples microtubule force and centromere stretch to move chromosomes, 2020, UNC Libraries
  • Regional variation of microtubule flux reveals microtubule organization in the metaphase meiotic spindle, 2020, UNC Libraries
  • A quantitative description of Ndc80 complex linkage to human kinetochores, 2021, UNC Libraries
  • Decoding Polo-like kinase 1 signaling along the kinetochore-centromere axis, 2020, UNC Libraries
  • An optimized method for 3D fluorescence co-localization applied to human kinetochore protein architecture, 2020, UNC Libraries

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Edward D. Salmon are:

  • Aussie Suzuki
  • Andrea Musacchio
  • Kerry Bloom
  • Jesse C. Gatlin
  • Benjamin L. Badger

The scientist's contributions reflect a sustained investigation into the molecular mechanisms regulating chromosome behavior and microtubule dynamics, supported by collaborations with peers in related fields. This profile synthesizes available data from their publication history, research topics, and academic collaborations within the context of their primary institutional affiliation.

Best Publications

  • The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time.

    Andrea Musacchio;Edward D. Salmon

  • Dynamic Instability of Individual Microtubules Analyzed by Video Light Microscopy: Rate Constants and Transition Frequencies

    R A Walker;E T O'Brien;N K Pryer;M F Soboeiro

  • Kinetochore microtubule dynamics and attachment stability are regulated by Hec1.

    Jennifer G. DeLuca;Walter E. Gall;Claudio Ciferri;Daniela Cimini

  • Association of Spindle Assembly Checkpoint Component XMAD2 with Unattached Kinetochores

    Rey-Huei Chen;Jennifer C. Waters;E. D. Salmon;Andrew W. Murray

  • Force Generation by Microtubule Assembly/Disassembly in Mitosis and Related Movements

    Shinya Inoué;Edward D. Salmon

  • Merotelic kinetochore orientation is a major mechanism of aneuploidy in mitotic mammalian tissue cells

    Daniela Cimini;Bonnie Howell;Paul Maddox;Alexey Khodjakov

  • Cytoplasmic dynein/dynactin drives kinetochore protein transport to the spindle poles and has a role in mitotic spindle checkpoint inactivation

    B.J. Howell;B.F. McEwen;J.C. Canman;D.B. Hoffman

  • Actomyosin-based Retrograde Flow of Microtubules in the Lamella of Migrating Epithelial Cells Influences Microtubule Dynamic Instability and Turnover and Is Associated with Microtubule Breakage and Treadmilling

    Clare M. Waterman-Storer;Edward D Salmon

  • Implications for Kinetochore-Microtubule Attachment from the Structure of an Engineered Ndc80 Complex

    Claudio Ciferri;Sebastiano Pasqualato;Emanuela Screpanti;Gianluca Varetti

  • Microtubule growth activates Rac1 to promote lamellipodial protrusion in fibroblasts

    Clare M. Waterman-Storer;Rebecca A. Worthylake;Betty P. Liu;Keith Burridge

  • The vertebrate cell kinetochore and its roles during mitosis

    Conly L Rieder;E.D Salmon

  • Localization of Mad2 to Kinetochores Depends on Microtubule Attachment, Not Tension

    Jennifer C. Waters;Rey-Huei Chen;Andrew W. Murray;E.D. Salmon

  • Tubulin dynamics in cultured mammalian cells.

    W M Saxton;D L Stemple;R J Leslie;E D Salmon

  • Directional instability of kinetochore motility during chromosome congression and segregation in mitotic newt lung cells: a push-pull mechanism.

    Robert V. Skibbens;Victoria Petrie Skeen;Edward D Salmon

  • The Mad1/Mad2 Complex as a Template for Mad2 Activation in the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint

    Anna De Antoni;Chad G. Pearson;Daniela Cimini;Julie C. Canman

  • Involvement of an Actomyosin Contractile Ring in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Cytokinesis

    Erfei Bi;Paul Maddox;Daniel J. Lew;E.D. Salmon

  • The dynamic kinetochore-microtubule interface.

    Helder Maiato;Jennifer DeLuca;E. D. Salmon;William C. Earnshaw

  • Chromosomes Can Congress to the Metaphase Plate Before Biorientation

    Tarun M. Kapoor;Michael A. Lampson;Polla Hergert;Lisa Cameron;Lisa Cameron

  • Rapid assembly dynamics of the Escherichia coli FtsZ-ring demonstrated by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching

    Jesse Stricker;Paul Maddox;E. D. Salmon;Harold P. Erickson

  • Spindle Checkpoint Protein Dynamics at Kinetochores in Living Cells

    Bonnie J Howell;Ben Moree;Emily M Farrar;Scott Stewart

Frequent Co-Authors

Kerry Bloom
Kerry Bloom University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Timothy J. Mitchison
Timothy J. Mitchison Harvard University
Paul S. Maddox
Paul S. Maddox University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Clare M. Waterman-Storer
Clare M. Waterman-Storer National Institutes of Health
Lynne Cassimeris
Lynne Cassimeris Lehigh University
Andrea Musacchio
Andrea Musacchio Max Planck Society
Harold P. Erickson
Harold P. Erickson Duke University
Arshad Desai
Arshad Desai University of California, San Diego
Conly L. Rieder
Conly L. Rieder New York State Department of Health
Gaudenz Danuser
Gaudenz Danuser The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens doors to a variety of online degree and career options, especially in healthcare and life sciences. Many graduates consider advancing their expertise through programs like a cheap online MBA healthcare administration degree. This path is ideal for students wanting leadership roles in healthcare systems, as these programs are both affordable and flexible.

Another popular direction is entering the rapidly growing field of medical coding and billing. If you’re deciding between certifications, it’s important to compare ccs vs cpc salary to understand pay potential and job scope. Choosing the right certification can influence your career trajectory and earning potential considerably.

For those interested in medical coding, many wonder how long does it take to become a medical coder. Most programs can be completed in a year or less, offering a quick route to entering the workforce. Finally, it’s essential to weigh the pros and cons before pursuing this path—explore is medical coding a good career to help determine if it aligns with your long-term goals.

Best Scientists Citing Edward D. Salmon

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles