World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
75
Citations
16713
World Ranking
19220
National Ranking
373

John Pernow publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Pernow sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 328 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

John Pernow D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Pernow sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

John Pernow is affiliated with Karolinska University Hospital in Sweden. Their research spans the fields of medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a primary focus in cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, physiology, molecular biology, immunology, and epidemiology.

The scientist's work concentrates on key topics including erythrocyte function and pathophysiology, nitric oxide and endothelin effects, adipokines, inflammation, and metabolic diseases, neutrophil, myeloperoxidase and oxidative mechanisms, extracellular vesicles in disease, long-term effects of COVID-19, and microRNA in disease regulation.

John Pernow has contributed to several notable papers, including:

  • IMproving Preclinical Assessment of Cardioprotective Therapies (IMPACT) criteria: guidelines of the EU-CARDIOPROTECTION COST Action, 2021, Basic Research in Cardiology
  • Hyperglycemia Induces Myocardial Dysfunction via Epigenetic Regulation of JunD, 2020, Circulation Research
  • Novel perspectives on redox signaling in red blood cells and platelets in cardiovascular disease, 2021, Free Radical Biology and Medicine
  • Red Blood Cell Peroxynitrite Causes Endothelial Dysfunction in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus via Arginase, 2020, Cells
  • A randomized clinical trial of the effects of leafy green vegetables and inorganic nitrate on blood pressure, 2020, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

The scientist frequently publishes in the following venues:

  • European Heart Journal
  • Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology
  • American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Circulation

Collaborations constitute a significant part of John Pernow's research. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Ali Mahdi
  • Aida Collado
  • Zhichao Zhou
  • John Tengbom
  • Tong Jiao

Best Publications

  • The importance of endothelin-1 for vascular dysfunction in cardiovascular disease.

    Felix Böhm;John Pernow

  • Oxygen Therapy in Suspected Acute Myocardial Infarction

    Robin Hofmann;Stefan K James;Stefan K James;Tomas Jernberg;Bertil Lindahl

  • Arginase as a potential target in the treatment of cardiovascular disease: reversal of arginine steal?

    John Pernow;Christian Jung;Christian Jung

  • Myocardial infarction mediated by endothelin receptor signaling in hypercholesterolemic mice

    Giuseppina Caligiuri;Bernard Levy;John Pernow;Peter Thorén

  • Pharmacological possibilities for protection against myocardial reperfusion injury

    Qing-Dong Wang;John Pernow;Per-Ove Sjöquist;Lars Rydén

  • Baroreflex modulation of sympathetic activity and sympathetic neurotransmitters in humans

    D. L. Eckberg;R. F. Rea;O. K. Andersson;T. Hedner

  • Glucagon-like peptide-1 relaxes rat conduit arteries via an endothelium-independent mechanism.

    Thomas Nyström;Adrian T. Gonon;Åke Sjöholm;John Pernow

  • Guanethidine-sensitive release of neuropeptide Y-like immunoreactivity in the cat spleen by sympathetic nerve stimulation

    Jan.M. Lundberg;Anders Änggård;Elvar Theodorsson-Norheim;John Pernow

  • Mechanisms underlying pre- and postjunctional effects of neuropeptide Y in sympathetic vascular control.

    John Pernow;Alois Saria;Jan M. Lundberg

  • Remote ischaemic pre- and delayed postconditioning - similar degree of cardioprotection but distinct mechanisms.

    Marina Basalay;Veronika Barsukevich;Svetlana Mastitskaya;Alexander Mrochek

  • Arginase Inhibition Improves Endothelial Function in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

    Alexey Shemyakin;Oskar Kövamees;Arnar Rafnsson;Felix Böhm

  • Plasma neuropeptide Y-like immunoreactivity and catecholamines during various degrees of sympathetic activation in man.

    John Pernow;Jan M. Lundberg;Lennart Kaijser;Paul Hjemdahl

  • Urotensin II evokes potent vasoconstriction in humans in vivo

    Felix Böhm;John Pernow

  • Effect of postconditioning on infarct size in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction

    Peder Sörensson;Nawzad Saleh;Frederic Bouvier;Felix Böhm

  • Cardiovascular effects of calcitonin gene-related peptides I and II in man.

    A Franco-Cereceda;C Gennari;R Nami;D Agnusdei

  • Vasoconstrictor effects in vivo and plasma disappearance rate of neuropeptide Y in man

    J. Pernow;J.M. Lundberg;L. Kaijser

  • Arginase inhibition mediates cardioprotection during ischaemia-reperfusion.

    Christian Jung;Adrian T Gonon;Per-Ove Sjöquist;Jon O Lundberg

  • Endothelin in myocardial ischaemia and reperfusion

    John Pernow;Qing-Dong Wang

  • Assessment of left ventricular structure and function in preeclampsia by echocardiography and cardiovascular biomarkers.

    Rangeen Rafik Hamad;Anders Larsson;John Pernow;Katarina Bremme

  • Neuropeptide Y and sympathetic neurotransmission.

    Jan M. Lundberg;Anders Franco‐Cereceda;Jean‐Silvain Lacroix;John Pernow

Frequent Co-Authors

Jan M. Lundberg
Jan M. Lundberg Karolinska Institute
Jon O. Lundberg
Jon O. Lundberg Karolinska Institute
Christian Jung
Christian Jung Kiel University
Lars Rydén
Lars Rydén Karolinska Institute
David Erlinge
David Erlinge Lund University
Eddie Weitzberg
Eddie Weitzberg Karolinska Institute
Paul Hjemdahl
Paul Hjemdahl Karolinska University Hospital
Kerstin Brismar
Kerstin Brismar Karolinska Institute
Malte Kelm
Malte Kelm Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Ulf Hedin
Ulf Hedin Karolinska Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA doesn’t always mean following the traditional MD route. Many healthcare professionals start with flexible, online programs that quickly lead to rewarding careers. For example, nurses who want to advance their credentials can consider online rn to bsn programs no clinicals, designed for RNs looking to attain a bachelor’s degree without on-site requirements.

If you’re a registered nurse aiming for leadership or specialized clinical roles, Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) degrees open doors to advanced practice. Busy professionals can benefit from dnp programs online that offer accelerated coursework. Some may prefer online dnp programs without clinicals for added convenience, reducing the need for in-person commitments.

For those starting their journey in nursing, a lpn program can provide a fast track into patient care, often through flexible online study. Each of these pathways helps you build a solid foundation in healthcare and advance your medical career, all with the adaptability that online education offers.

Best Scientists Citing John Pernow

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles