World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 103 7199 6762 77 73 775 56085

Hans Erik Bøtker publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Hans Erik Bøtker between 1982 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Hans Erik Bøtker published across 45 years, from 1982 to 2026, averaging 17.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 67 publications in 2016. 17 of the 802 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 67. Peak 67 publications in 2016. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 2 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 2 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 3 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 10 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 24 publications 2010: 27 publications 2011: 32 publications 2012: 55 publications 2013: 42 publications 2014: 50 publications 2015: 44 publications 2016: 67 publications 2017: 65 publications 2018: 51 publications 2019: 61 publications 2020: 42 publications 2021: 53 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 18 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 15 publications 2026: 2 publications
1982 2026

802 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Hans Erik Bøtker: publications per year, 1982 to 2026
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 1
1984 0
1985 1
1986 2
1987 0
1988 2
1989 1
1990 2
1991 3
1992 1
1993 3
1994 3
1995 3
1996 4
1997 9
1998 4
1999 10
2000 4
2001 8
2002 7
2003 6
2004 5
2005 11
2006 14
2007 10
2008 11
2009 24
2010 27
2011 32
2012 55
2013 42
2014 50
2015 44
2016 67
2017 65
2018 51
2019 61
2020 42
2021 53
2022 17
2023 18
2024 11
2025 15
2026 2
Total 802
Download as CSV

Hans Erik Bøtker publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hans Erik Bøtker sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 761–780 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 775 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228 775
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Hans Erik Bøtker D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hans Erik Bøtker sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 102–103 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 103 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630 103
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Hans Erik Bøtker is affiliated with Aarhus University Hospital in Denmark. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with significant contributions to Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, and Emergency Medicine.

The scientist's work covers several main topics, including:

  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion
  • Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health

Among the recent papers associated with this researcher are:

  • Identification of vulnerable plaques and patients by intracoronary near-infrared spectroscopy and ultrasound (PROSPECT II): a prospective natural history study, 2021, The Lancet
  • Impact of Plaque Burden Versus Stenosis on Ischemic Events in Patients With Coronary Atherosclerosis, 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Vulnerable Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque, 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Incorporating Coronary Calcification Into Pre-Test Assessment of the Likelihood of Coronary Artery Disease, 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • IMproving Preclinical Assessment of Cardioprotective Therapies (IMPACT) criteria: guidelines of the EU-CARDIOPROTECTION COST Action, 2021, Basic Research in Cardiology

Frequent collaborators in their research include Michael Mæng, Henrik Toft Sørensen, Lisette Okkels Jensen, Jesper Møller Jensen, and Bjarne Linde Nørgaard.

Their publications are often found in the following venues:

  • Basic Research in Cardiology
  • The American Journal of Cardiology
  • European Heart Journal
  • Circulation
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Best Publications

  • Third universal definition of myocardial infarction

    Kristian Thygesen;Joseph S. Alpert;Allan S. Jaffe;Maarten L. Simoons

  • 2014 ESC/ESA Guidelines on non-cardiac surgery: cardiovascular assessment and management: The Joint Task Force on non-cardiac surgery: cardiovascular assessment and management of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA).

    Steen Dalby Kristensen;Juhani Knuuti;Antti Saraste;Stefan Anker

  • Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in suspected coronary artery disease: the NXT trial (Analysis of Coronary Blood Flow Using CT Angiography: Next Steps).

    Bjarne L Nørgaard;Jonathon Leipsic;Sara Gaur;Sujith Seneviratne

  • Remote ischaemic conditioning before hospital admission, as a complement to angioplasty, and effect on myocardial salvage in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a randomised trial

    Hans Erik Bøtker;Rajesh Kharbanda;Michael R Schmidt;Morten Bøttcher

  • Positive predictive value of cardiovascular diagnoses in the Danish National Patient Registry: a validation study.

    Jens Sundbøll;Kasper Adelborg;Troels Munch;Trine Frøslev

  • Remote Ischemic Conditioning

    Gerd Heusch;Hans Erik Bøtker;Karin Przyklenk;Andrew Redington

  • Direct intramyocardial plasmid vascular endothelial growth factor-A165 gene therapy in patients with stable severe angina pectoris A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study: the Euroinject One trial.

    Jens Kastrup;Erik Jørgensen;Andreas Rück;Kristina Tägil

  • Exenatide reduces reperfusion injury in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

    Jacob Lønborg;Niels Vejlstrup;Henning Kelbæk;Hans Erik Bøtker

  • Multitarget Strategies to Reduce Myocardial Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury: JACC Review Topic of the Week.

    Sean M. Davidson;Péter Ferdinandy;Ioanna Andreadou;Hans Erik Bøtker

  • Effects of the Direct Lipoprotein-Associated Phospholipase A 2 Inhibitor Darapladib on Human Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque

    Patrick W. Serruys;Héctor M. García-García;Pawel Buszman;Paul Erne

  • 25 year trends in first time hospitalisation for acute myocardial infarction, subsequent short and long term mortality, and the prognostic impact of sex and comorbidity: a Danish nationwide cohort study.

    Morten Schmidt;Jacob Bonde Jacobsen;Timothy L Lash;Hans Erik Bøtker

  • 2014 ESC/ESA Guidelines on non-cardiac surgery: cardiovascular assessment and management: The Joint Task Force on non-cardiac surgery: cardiovascular assessment and management of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA).

    Steen Dalby Kristensen;Juhani Knuuti;Antti Saraste;Stefan Anker

  • Transcatheter Aortic Valve Thrombosis: Incidence, Predisposing Factors, and Clinical Implications.

    Nicolaj C. Hansson;Erik L. Grove;Henning R. Andersen;Jonathon Leipsic

  • Cardiovascular Effects of Treatment With the Ketone Body 3-Hydroxybutyrate in Chronic Heart Failure Patients

    Roni Nielsen;Niels Møller;Niels Møller;Lars C. Gormsen;Lars C. Gormsen;Lars Poulsen Tolbod

  • Practical guidelines for rigor and reproducibility in preclinical and clinical studies on cardioprotection.

    Hans Erik Bøtker;Derek Hausenloy;Ioanna Andreadou;Salvatore Antonucci

  • Improved long-term clinical outcomes in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing remote ischaemic conditioning as an adjunct to primary percutaneous coronary intervention

    Astrid D. Sloth;Michael R. Schmidt;Kim Munk;Rajesh K. Kharbanda;Rajesh K. Kharbanda

  • Ischaemic conditioning and targeting reperfusion injury: a 30 year voyage of discovery.

    Derek J. Hausenloy;Jose A. Barrabes;Hans Erik Bøtker;Sean M. Davidson

  • Novel targets and future strategies for acute cardioprotection: Position Paper of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Cellular Biology of the Heart.

    Derek J. Hausenloy;David Garcia-Dorado;Hans Erik Bøtker;Sean M. Davidson

  • Targeting reperfusion injury in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: trials and tribulations.

    Derek J. Hausenloy;Hans Erik Botker;Thomas Engstrom;David Erlinge

  • Electromechanical mapping for detection of myocardial viability in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.

    Hans Erik Bøtker;Jens Flensted Lassen;Flemming Hermansen;Henrik Wiggers

Frequent Co-Authors

Jens Flensted Lassen
Jens Flensted Lassen University of Southern Denmark
Henrik Toft Sørensen
Henrik Toft Sørensen Aarhus University
Leif Thuesen
Leif Thuesen Aalborg University
Ole Schmitz
Ole Schmitz Aarhus University Hospital
Steen Dalby Kristensen
Steen Dalby Kristensen Aarhus University Hospital
Lars Pedersen
Lars Pedersen Aarhus University
Derek J. Hausenloy
Derek J. Hausenloy National University of Singapore
Jonathon Leipsic
Jonathon Leipsic University of British Columbia
Derek M. Yellon
Derek M. Yellon University College London
Niels Møller
Niels Møller Aarhus University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine isn’t limited to becoming a physician. There are several related fields and online degree options that can lead to rewarding jobs in healthcare. For those seeking a practical and accessible entry into the profession, online adn programs (Associate Degree in Nursing) allow students to start nursing careers faster and often with more flexibility.

If patient care isn’t your primary interest, administrative roles offer a great alternative. Accredited medical billing and coding schools online with financial aid have made this career more accessible, letting you join the healthcare system from a technical standpoint.

Some programs are designed to ease the admissions process. For example, you may ask, do I need to take the TEAS test for LPN? Many nursing schools now offer alternatives that eliminate standardized testing barriers.

Finally, if you’re looking to advance into management, consider an online healthcare administration degree. This pathway prepares you for leadership roles across hospitals, clinics, and healthcare organizations.

Best Scientists Citing Hans Erik Bøtker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles