World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
103
Citations
56085
World Ranking
7200
National Ranking
77

Hans Erik Bøtker publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hans Erik Bøtker sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 775 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Hans Erik Bøtker D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hans Erik Bøtker sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 103 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Hans Erik Bøtker is affiliated with Aarhus University Hospital in Denmark. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with significant contributions to Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, and Emergency Medicine.

The scientist's work covers several main topics, including:

  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion
  • Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health

Among the recent papers associated with this researcher are:

  • Identification of vulnerable plaques and patients by intracoronary near-infrared spectroscopy and ultrasound (PROSPECT II): a prospective natural history study, 2021, The Lancet
  • Impact of Plaque Burden Versus Stenosis on Ischemic Events in Patients With Coronary Atherosclerosis, 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Vulnerable Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque, 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Incorporating Coronary Calcification Into Pre-Test Assessment of the Likelihood of Coronary Artery Disease, 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • IMproving Preclinical Assessment of Cardioprotective Therapies (IMPACT) criteria: guidelines of the EU-CARDIOPROTECTION COST Action, 2021, Basic Research in Cardiology

Frequent collaborators in their research include Michael Mæng, Henrik Toft Sørensen, Lisette Okkels Jensen, Jesper Møller Jensen, and Bjarne Linde Nørgaard.

Their publications are often found in the following venues:

  • Basic Research in Cardiology
  • The American Journal of Cardiology
  • European Heart Journal
  • Circulation
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Best Publications

  • Third universal definition of myocardial infarction

    Kristian Thygesen;Joseph S. Alpert;Allan S. Jaffe;Maarten L. Simoons

  • 2014 ESC/ESA Guidelines on non-cardiac surgery: cardiovascular assessment and management: The Joint Task Force on non-cardiac surgery: cardiovascular assessment and management of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA).

    Steen Dalby Kristensen;Juhani Knuuti;Antti Saraste;Stefan Anker

  • Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in suspected coronary artery disease: the NXT trial (Analysis of Coronary Blood Flow Using CT Angiography: Next Steps).

    Bjarne L Nørgaard;Jonathon Leipsic;Sara Gaur;Sujith Seneviratne

  • Remote ischaemic conditioning before hospital admission, as a complement to angioplasty, and effect on myocardial salvage in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a randomised trial

    Hans Erik Bøtker;Rajesh Kharbanda;Michael R Schmidt;Morten Bøttcher

  • Positive predictive value of cardiovascular diagnoses in the Danish National Patient Registry: a validation study.

    Jens Sundbøll;Kasper Adelborg;Troels Munch;Trine Frøslev

  • Remote Ischemic Conditioning

    Gerd Heusch;Hans Erik Bøtker;Karin Przyklenk;Andrew Redington

  • Direct intramyocardial plasmid vascular endothelial growth factor-A165 gene therapy in patients with stable severe angina pectoris A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study: the Euroinject One trial.

    Jens Kastrup;Erik Jørgensen;Andreas Rück;Kristina Tägil

  • Exenatide reduces reperfusion injury in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

    Jacob Lønborg;Niels Vejlstrup;Henning Kelbæk;Hans Erik Bøtker

  • Multitarget Strategies to Reduce Myocardial Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury: JACC Review Topic of the Week.

    Sean M. Davidson;Péter Ferdinandy;Ioanna Andreadou;Hans Erik Bøtker

  • Effects of the Direct Lipoprotein-Associated Phospholipase A 2 Inhibitor Darapladib on Human Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque

    Patrick W. Serruys;Héctor M. García-García;Pawel Buszman;Paul Erne

  • 25 year trends in first time hospitalisation for acute myocardial infarction, subsequent short and long term mortality, and the prognostic impact of sex and comorbidity: a Danish nationwide cohort study.

    Morten Schmidt;Jacob Bonde Jacobsen;Timothy L Lash;Hans Erik Bøtker

  • 2014 ESC/ESA Guidelines on non-cardiac surgery: cardiovascular assessment and management: The Joint Task Force on non-cardiac surgery: cardiovascular assessment and management of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA).

    Steen Dalby Kristensen;Juhani Knuuti;Antti Saraste;Stefan Anker

  • Transcatheter Aortic Valve Thrombosis: Incidence, Predisposing Factors, and Clinical Implications.

    Nicolaj C. Hansson;Erik L. Grove;Henning R. Andersen;Jonathon Leipsic

  • Cardiovascular Effects of Treatment With the Ketone Body 3-Hydroxybutyrate in Chronic Heart Failure Patients

    Roni Nielsen;Niels Møller;Niels Møller;Lars C. Gormsen;Lars C. Gormsen;Lars Poulsen Tolbod

  • Practical guidelines for rigor and reproducibility in preclinical and clinical studies on cardioprotection.

    Hans Erik Bøtker;Derek Hausenloy;Ioanna Andreadou;Salvatore Antonucci

  • Improved long-term clinical outcomes in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing remote ischaemic conditioning as an adjunct to primary percutaneous coronary intervention

    Astrid D. Sloth;Michael R. Schmidt;Kim Munk;Rajesh K. Kharbanda;Rajesh K. Kharbanda

  • Ischaemic conditioning and targeting reperfusion injury: a 30 year voyage of discovery.

    Derek J. Hausenloy;Jose A. Barrabes;Hans Erik Bøtker;Sean M. Davidson

  • Novel targets and future strategies for acute cardioprotection: Position Paper of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Cellular Biology of the Heart.

    Derek J. Hausenloy;David Garcia-Dorado;Hans Erik Bøtker;Sean M. Davidson

  • Targeting reperfusion injury in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: trials and tribulations.

    Derek J. Hausenloy;Hans Erik Botker;Thomas Engstrom;David Erlinge

  • Electromechanical mapping for detection of myocardial viability in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.

    Hans Erik Bøtker;Jens Flensted Lassen;Flemming Hermansen;Henrik Wiggers

Frequent Co-Authors

Jens Flensted Lassen
Jens Flensted Lassen University of Southern Denmark
Henrik Toft Sørensen
Henrik Toft Sørensen Aarhus University
Leif Thuesen
Leif Thuesen Aalborg University
Ole Schmitz
Ole Schmitz Aarhus University Hospital
Steen Dalby Kristensen
Steen Dalby Kristensen Aarhus University Hospital
Lars Pedersen
Lars Pedersen Aarhus University
Derek J. Hausenloy
Derek J. Hausenloy National University of Singapore
Jonathon Leipsic
Jonathon Leipsic University of British Columbia
Derek M. Yellon
Derek M. Yellon University College London
Niels Møller
Niels Møller Aarhus University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine isn’t limited to becoming a physician. There are several related fields and online degree options that can lead to rewarding jobs in healthcare. For those seeking a practical and accessible entry into the profession, online adn programs (Associate Degree in Nursing) allow students to start nursing careers faster and often with more flexibility.

If patient care isn’t your primary interest, administrative roles offer a great alternative. Accredited medical billing and coding schools online with financial aid have made this career more accessible, letting you join the healthcare system from a technical standpoint.

Some programs are designed to ease the admissions process. For example, you may ask, do I need to take the TEAS test for LPN? Many nursing schools now offer alternatives that eliminate standardized testing barriers.

Finally, if you’re looking to advance into management, consider an online healthcare administration degree. This pathway prepares you for leadership roles across hospitals, clinics, and healthcare organizations.

Best Scientists Citing Hans Erik Bøtker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles