World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
119
Citations
54164
World Ranking
3889
National Ranking
386

David J. Webb publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David J. Webb sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 721 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

David J. Webb D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David J. Webb sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 119 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2004 - Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh

Overview

David J. Webb is affiliated with the University of Edinburgh in the United Kingdom. Over their career, they have been recognized with the award of Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh in 2004.

Their academic profile lacks specific details on recent papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues. Additionally, there is no provided information on their main or subfields of study, nor their specialized research topics.

Despite the limited data on publications and research foci, the recognition by the Royal Society of Edinburgh indicates a level of professional contribution within their field. The fellowship is an acknowledgment from a prominent scholarly institution, typically awarded for significant achievements in science, academia, or public service related to research.

Best Publications

  • Aortic pulse wave velocity improves cardiovascular event prediction: an individual participant meta-analysis of prospective observational data from 17,635 subjects

    Yoav Ben-Shlomo;Melissa Spears;Chris Boustred;Margaret May

  • The influence of heart rate on augmentation index and central arterial pressure in humans

    Ian B. Wilkinson;Helen MacCallum;Laura Flint;John R. Cockcroft

  • Reproducibility of pulse wave velocity and augmentation index measured by pulse wave analysis

    Ian B. Wilkinson;Sabine A. Fuchs;Ilse M. Jansen;James C. Spratt

  • Noninvasive Assessment of Arterial Stiffness and Risk of Atherosclerotic Events

    James J. Oliver;David J. Webb

  • Spironolactone versus placebo, bisoprolol, and doxazosin to determine the optimal treatment for drug-resistant hypertension (PATHWAY-2): a randomised, double-blind, crossover trial

    Bryan Williams;Thomas M MacDonald;Steve Morant;David J Webb

  • Endothelial function and dysfunction. Part II: Association with cardiovascular risk factors and diseases. A statement by the Working Group on Endothelins and Endothelial Factors of the European Society of Hypertension

    Hanspeter Brunner;John R Cockcroft;John E Deanfield;Ann Donald

  • A high-fat meal induces low-grade endotoxemia: evidence of a novel mechanism of postprandial inflammation

    Clett Erridge;Teresa Attina;Corinne M Spickett;David J Webb

  • Endothelial function and dysfunction. Part I: Methodological issues for assessment in the different vascular beds: A statement by the working group on endothelin and endothelial factors of the European society of hypertension

    John E Deanfield;Ann Donald;Claudio Ferri;Cristina Giannattasio

  • Contribution of endogenous generation of endothelin-1 to basal vascular tone

    W.G Haynes;D.J Webb

  • The revision of the Declaration of Helsinki: past, present and future

    Robert V. Carlson;Kenneth M. Boyd;David J. Webb

  • Nitric Oxide Regulates Local Arterial Distensibility In Vivo

    Ian B. Wilkinson;Ahmed Qasem;Carmel M. McEniery;David J. Webb

  • Increased central pulse pressure and augmentation index in subjects with hypercholesterolemia

    Ian B. Wilkinson;Krishna Prasad;Ian R. Hall;Anne Gwenllian Thomas

  • Circulating microRNAs as potential markers of human drug‐induced liver injury

    Philip J. Starkey Lewis;James Dear;Vivien Platt;Kenneth J. Simpson

  • Endothelin-A Receptor Antagonist–Mediated Vasodilatation Is Attenuated by Inhibition of Nitric Oxide Synthesis and by Endothelin-B Receptor Blockade

    Marianne C. Verhaar;Fiona E. Strachan;David E. Newby;Nicholas L. Cruden

  • Endothelin as a regulator of cardiovascular function in health and disease.

    William G. Haynes;David J. Webb

  • Pulse-wave analysis: clinical evaluation of a noninvasive, widely applicable method for assessing endothelial function.

    Ian B. Wilkinson;Ian R. Hall;Helen MacCallum;Isla S. Mackenzie

  • Pulse transit time measured from the ECG: an unreliable marker of beat-to-beat blood pressure

    R A Payne;C N Symeonides;David J Webb;S R J Maxwell

  • Endothelial Dysfunction, Impaired Endogenous Fibrinolysis, and Cigarette Smoking A Mechanism for Arterial Thrombosis and Myocardial Infarction

    David E. Newby;Robert A. Wright;Catherine Labinjoh;Christopher A. Ludlam

  • Identification and proteomic profiling of exosomes in human cerebrospinal fluid

    Jonathan M. Street;Perdita E. Barran;C. Logan MacKay;Stefan K. Weidt

  • Measuring Forearm Blood Flow and Interpreting the Responses to Drugs and Mediators

    Nigel Benjamin;Alison Calver;Joe Collier;Brian Robinson

Frequent Co-Authors

David E. Newby
David E. Newby University of Edinburgh
Ian B. Wilkinson
Ian B. Wilkinson University of Cambridge
Ian L. Megson
Ian L. Megson University of the Highlands and Islands
Brian R. Walker
Brian R. Walker Newcastle University
Keith A.A. Fox
Keith A.A. Fox University of Edinburgh
Thomas M. MacDonald
Thomas M. MacDonald University of Dundee
Bryan Williams
Bryan Williams University College London
Michael Eddleston
Michael Eddleston University of Edinburgh
Anthony P. Davenport
Anthony P. Davenport University of Cambridge
Ian Ford
Ian Ford University of Glasgow

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine offers more options than ever before, thanks to the rise of flexible online programs. For nurses aiming to advance their clinical roles, the most affordable dnp programs make it possible to earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice from home, often while still working. Pharmacists can follow a similar path with the cheapest online pharmacy school options, designed to make graduate education more accessible.

Not everyone who wants to work in healthcare needs to be on the front lines. A health information management degree online prepares students for careers organizing and protecting medical data—an in-demand field as healthcare becomes more digital. Another growing area is medical billing and coding, ideal for those seeking flexible, remote-friendly jobs. Look for an accredited medical coding certification online to get started quickly.

These online pathways support a range of healthcare careers, helping more students balance work, life, and education while meeting America’s need for skilled medical professionals.

Best Scientists Citing David J. Webb

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles