World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Best Female Scientists
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Best Female Scientists 122 491 467 288 271 452 69663
Medicine 124 3175 2962 1752 1613 449 71608

Barbara J. Stoll publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Barbara J. Stoll between 1977 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Barbara J. Stoll published across 50 years, from 1977 to 2026, averaging 10.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 33 publications in 2003. 15 of the 504 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1977 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 33. Peak 33 publications in 2003. 1977: 2 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 4 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 4 publications 1983: 8 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 8 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 9 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 8 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 10 publications 1997: 11 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 12 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 33 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 15 publications 2006: 21 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 19 publications 2013: 29 publications 2014: 24 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 22 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 20 publications 2019: 19 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 18 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 14 publications 2026: 1 publication
1977 2026

504 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Barbara J. Stoll: publications per year, 1977 to 2026
Year Publications
1977 2
1978 0
1979 0
1980 4
1981 1
1982 4
1983 8
1984 0
1985 8
1986 5
1987 2
1988 2
1989 3
1990 2
1991 4
1992 9
1993 5
1994 8
1995 5
1996 10
1997 11
1998 8
1999 12
2000 6
2001 7
2002 7
2003 33
2004 5
2005 15
2006 21
2007 7
2008 9
2009 11
2010 11
2011 14
2012 19
2013 29
2014 24
2015 12
2016 22
2017 18
2018 20
2019 19
2020 9
2021 11
2022 14
2023 18
2024 15
2025 14
2026 1
Total 504
Download as CSV

Barbara J. Stoll publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Barbara J. Stoll sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 441–460 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 449 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771 449
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Barbara J. Stoll D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Barbara J. Stoll sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 124–125 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 124 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256 124
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Best Female Scientists Award
  • 2016 - John Howland Award, American Pediatric Society (APS)
  • 2009 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)

Overview

Barbara J. Stoll is affiliated with The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston in the United States. Their research spans primarily the field of Medicine, with significant contributions to Nursing. Their work focuses on subfields such as Nutrition and Dietetics, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Surgery.

The scientist's research topics include:

  • Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
  • Infant Nutrition and Health
  • Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Muscle Metabolism and Nutrition
  • Neonatal and Maternal Infections
  • Birth, Development, and Health

Barbara J. Stoll has published extensively in several journals, with the most frequent venues being:

  • The Journal of Pediatrics
  • JAMA Network Open
  • Current Developments in Nutrition
  • JAMA
  • JAMA Pediatrics

Frequent co-authors in their publications include:

  • Douglas G. Burrin
  • Edward F. Bell
  • Abhik Das
  • Michele C. Walsh
  • Abbot R. Laptook

Among their recent published papers are:

  • Mortality, In-Hospital Morbidity, Care Practices, and 2-Year Outcomes for Extremely Preterm Infants in the US, 2013-2018, 2022, JAMA
  • Early-Onset Neonatal Sepsis 2015 to 2017, the Rise of Escherichia coli, and the Need for Novel Prevention Strategies, 2020, JAMA Pediatrics
  • Initial Laparotomy Versus Peritoneal Drainage in Extremely Low Birthweight Infants With Surgical Necrotizing Enterocolitis or Isolated Intestinal Perforation, 2021, Annals of Surgery
  • Racial/Ethnic Disparities Among Extremely Preterm Infants in the United States From 2002 to 2016, 2020, JAMA Network Open
  • Neurodevelopmental outcomes following neonatal late-onset sepsis and blood culture-negative conditions, 2021, Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal & Neonatal

Barbara J. Stoll was recognized with the John Howland Award from the American Pediatric Society in 2016 and was elected a member of the National Academy of Medicine in 2009.

Best Publications

  • Whole-body hypothermia for neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy.

    Seetha Shankaran;Abbot R. Laptook;Richard A. Ehrenkranz;Jon E. Tyson

  • Neonatal Outcomes of Extremely Preterm Infants From the NICHD Neonatal Research Network

    Barbara J. Stoll;Nellie I. Hansen;Edward F. Bell;Seetha Shankaran

  • Late-Onset Sepsis in Very Low Birth Weight Neonates: The Experience of the NICHD Neonatal Research Network

    Barbara J. Stoll;Nellie Hansen;Avroy A. Fanaroff;Linda L. Wright

  • Trends in Care Practices, Morbidity, and Mortality of Extremely Preterm Neonates, 1993-2012

    Barbara J. Stoll;Nellie I. Hansen;Edward F. Bell;Michele C. Walsh

  • Very low birth weight outcomes of the National Institute of Child health and human development neonatal research network, January 1995 through December 1996. NICHD Neonatal Research Network.

    James A. Lemons;Charles R. Bauer;William Oh;Sheldon B. Korones

  • Neurodevelopmental and growth impairment among extremely low-birth-weight infants with neonatal infection.

    Barbara J. Stoll;Nellie I. Hansen;Ira Adams-Chapman;Avroy A. Fanaroff

  • Trends in neonatal morbidity and mortality for very low birthweight infants

    Avroy A. Fanaroff;Barbara J. Stoll;Linda L. Wright;Waldemar A. Carlo

  • Early Onset Neonatal Sepsis: The Burden of Group B Streptococcal and E. coli Disease Continues

    Barbara J. Stoll;Nellie I. Hansen;Pablo J. Sánchez;Roger G. Faix

  • Early-onset sepsis in very low birth weight neonates : A report from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network

    Barbara J. Stoll;Tavia Gordon;Sheldon B. Korones;Seetha Shankaran

  • Longitudinal Growth of Hospitalized Very Low Birth Weight Infants

    Richard A. Ehrenkranz;Naji Younes;James A. Lemons;Avroy A. Fanaroff

  • Changes in pathogens causing early-onset sepsis in very-low-birth-weight infants

    Barbara J. Stoll;Nellie Hansen;Avroy A. Fanaroff;Linda L. Wright

  • Prolonged duration of initial empirical antibiotic treatment is associated with increased rates of necrotizing enterocolitis and death for extremely low birth weight infants.

    C. Michael Cotten;Sarah Taylor;Barbara J Stoll;Ronald N. Goldberg

  • Neurodevelopmental and Growth Outcomes of Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants After Necrotizing Enterocolitis

    Susan R. Hintz;Douglas E. Kendrick;Barbara J. Stoll;Betty R. Vohr

  • Neonatal Candidiasis Among Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants: Risk Factors, Mortality Rates, and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes at 18 to 22 Months

    Daniel K. Benjamin;Barbara J. Stoll;Avory A. Fanaroff;Scott A. McDonald

  • Causes and Timing of Death in Extremely Premature Infants from 2000 through 2011

    Ravi M. Patel;Sarah Kandefer;Michele C. Walsh;Edward F. Bell

  • Neonatal infectious diseases: evaluation of neonatal sepsis.

    Andres Camacho-Gonzalez;Paul W. Spearman;Barbara J. Stoll

  • Role of human milk in extremely low birth weight infants’ risk of necrotizing enterocolitis or death

    J. Meinzen-Derr;B. Poindexter;L. Wrage;A. L. Morrow

  • Persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn in the era before nitric oxide: practice variation and outcomes.

    Michele C. Walsh-Sukys;Jon E. Tyson;Linda L. Wright;Charles R. Bauer

  • Between-Hospital Variation in Treatment and Outcomes in Extremely Preterm Infants

    Matthew A. Rysavy;Lei Li;Edward F. Bell;Abhik Das

  • Whole-Body Hypothermia for Neonates With Hypoxic???Ischemic Encephalopathy

    Seetha Shankaran;Abbot R. Laptook;Richard A. Ehrenkranz;Jon E. Tyson

Frequent Co-Authors

Rosemary D. Higgins
Rosemary D. Higgins George Mason University
Abhik Das
Abhik Das RTI International
Seetha Shankaran
Seetha Shankaran Wayne State University
Waldemar A. Carlo
Waldemar A. Carlo University of Alabama at Birmingham
Abbot R. Laptook
Abbot R. Laptook Brown University
Edward F. Bell
Edward F. Bell University of Iowa
Michele C. Walsh
Michele C. Walsh Case Western Reserve University
Richard A. Ehrenkranz
Richard A. Ehrenkranz Yale University
Linda L. Wright
Linda L. Wright National Institutes of Health
William Oh
William Oh Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Aspiring medical professionals have a range of online degree options and career pathways to consider outside the traditional MD route. For those seeking a fast entry into the healthcare workforce, fast lpn program options allow students to qualify as a Licensed Practical Nurse in less time, offering a practical starting point for hands-on patient care.

Nurses aiming to advance their expertise can explore psych nurse practitioner programs, which prepare professionals for specialized roles in mental health care. These programs often offer flexible, accelerated online formats tailored to working nurses.

For those interested in healthcare leadership and management, pursuing an online Master of Healthcare Administration (MHA) is a strategic choice. Prospective students can compare the cheapest mha programs online to find affordable, accredited options, and it’s important to understand the cost of mha degree and potential return on investment.

These flexible, online pathways provide diverse opportunities for advancing your career in the American healthcare system—whether you are starting out or moving into leadership.

Best Scientists Citing Barbara J. Stoll

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles