World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Daniel K. Benjamin

Daniel K. Benjamin

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
91
Citations
31698
World Ranking
11721
National Ranking
6013

Daniel K. Benjamin publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel K. Benjamin sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 398 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Daniel K. Benjamin D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel K. Benjamin sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel K. Benjamin is affiliated with Duke University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Medicine, with a substantial number of publications contributing to the field. Key subfields of study include Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health; Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health; Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine; Infectious Diseases; and Epidemiology.

Their work spans several main topics, reflecting diverse interests within medical research. These topics include:

  • Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
  • Pharmaceutical studies and practices
  • Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Neonatal and Maternal Infections
  • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Ethics in Clinical Research

Recent publications demonstrate a focus on pediatric health and infectious diseases, particularly related to SARS-CoV-2 and neonatal care. Notable papers include:

  • "Incidence and Secondary Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 Infections in Schools" (2021), published in PEDIATRICS
  • "Medication Use in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and Changes from 2010 to 2018" (2021), published in The Journal of Pediatrics
  • "Abatacept, Cenicriviroc, or Infliximab for Treatment of Adults Hospitalized With COVID-19 Pneumonia" (2023), published in JAMA
  • "School Masking Policies and Secondary SARS-CoV-2 Transmission" (2022), published in PEDIATRICS
  • "Association between Nephrotoxic Drug Combinations and Acute Kidney Injury in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit" (2020), published in The Journal of Pediatrics

Frequent co-authors provide insight into collaborative networks, with consistent partnerships including:

  • Kanecia O. Zimmerman
  • Rachel G. Greenberg
  • Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez
  • Christoph P. Hornik
  • Reese H. Clark

Publications appear predominantly in certain key venues that have contributed the most to their scholarly output. These venues include:

  • UNC Libraries
  • PEDIATRICS
  • Journal of Perinatology
  • Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society
  • The Journal of Pediatrics

Best Publications

  • Clinical practice guidelines for the management of candidiasis: 2009 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

    Peter G. Pappas;Carol A. Kauffman;David Andes;Daniel K. Benjamin

  • Prolonged duration of initial empirical antibiotic treatment is associated with increased rates of necrotizing enterocolitis and death for extremely low birth weight infants.

    C. Michael Cotten;Sarah Taylor;Barbara J Stoll;Ronald N. Goldberg

  • 10 × '20 Progress—Development of New Drugs Active Against Gram-Negative Bacilli: An Update From the Infectious Diseases Society of America

    Helen W. Boucher;George H. Talbot;Daniel K. Benjamin;Daniel K. Benjamin;John Bradley;John Bradley

  • Neonatal Candidiasis Among Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants: Risk Factors, Mortality Rates, and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes at 18 to 22 Months

    Daniel K. Benjamin;Barbara J. Stoll;Avory A. Fanaroff;Scott A. McDonald

  • Early and late onset sepsis in very-low-birth-weight infants from a large group of neonatal intensive care units.

    C.P. Hornik;P. Fort;R.H. Clark;K. Watt;K. Watt

  • Early Predictors of In-Hospital Death in Infective Endocarditis

    Vivian H. Chu;Christopher H. Cabell;Daniel K. Benjamin;Erin F. Kuniholm

  • Neonatal Meningitis: What Is the Correlation Among Cerebrospinal Fluid Cultures, Blood Cultures, and Cerebrospinal Fluid Parameters?

    Harmony P. Garges;M. Anthony Moody;C. Michael Cotten;P. Brian Smith

  • Cross-reactive immunologic material status affects treatment outcomes in Pompe disease infants.

    Priya S. Kishnani;Paula C. Goldenberg;Stephanie L. Dearmey;James Heller

  • Neonatal candidiasis: Epidemiology, risk factors, and clinical judgment

    Daniel K. Benjamin;Barbara J. Stoll;Marie G. Gantz;Michele C. Walsh

  • Use of Vancomycin or First-Generation Cephalosporins for the Treatment of Hemodialysis-Dependent Patients with Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia

    Martin E. Stryjewski;Lynda A. Szczech;Daniel K. Benjamin;Jula K. Inrig

  • Early and Late Onset Sepsis in Late Preterm Infants

    Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez;Cassandra Moran;Daniel K Benjamin;C Michael Cotten

  • Analysis of the impact of early surgery on in-hospital mortality of native valve endocarditis: use of propensity score and instrumental variable methods to adjust for treatment-selection bias.

    Tahaniyat Lalani;Christopher H. Cabell;Daniel K. Benjamin;Ovidiu Lasca

  • Medication Use in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

    Emily M. Hsieh;Emily M. Hsieh;Christoph P. Hornik;Reese H. Clark;Matthew M. Laughon

  • The Association of Third-Generation Cephalosporin Use and Invasive Candidiasis in Extremely Low Birth-Weight Infants

    C. Michael Cotten;Scott McDonald;Barbara J Stoll;Ronald N. Goldberg

  • Infections Due to Aspergillus terreus: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis of 83 Cases

    William J. Steinbach;Daniel K. Benjamin;Dimitrios P Kontoyiannis;John R. Perfect

  • Risk Factors For Hematogenous Complications of Intravascular Catheter—Associated Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia

    Vance G. Fowler;Anita Justice;Catrin Moore;Daniel K. Benjamin

  • Calcineurin Controls Growth, Morphology, and Pathogenicity in Aspergillus fumigatus

    William J. Steinbach;Robert A. Cramer;B. Zachary Perfect;Yohannes G. Asfaw

  • Non-HACEK gram-negative bacillus endocarditis.

    Susan Morpeth;David Murdoch;Christopher H. Cabell;Adolf W. Karchmer

  • Neonatal Candidemia and End-Organ Damage: A Critical Appraisal of the Literature Using Meta-analytic Techniques

    Daniel K. Benjamin;Daniel K. Benjamin;Charles Poole;William J. Steinbach;Judith L. Rowen

  • Use of the complete blood cell count in early-onset neonatal sepsis.

    Christoph P. Hornik;Daniel K. Benjamin;Kristian C. Becker;Jennifer Li

Frequent Co-Authors

Reese H. Clark
Reese H. Clark Greenville Memorial Hospital
Jennifer S. Li
Jennifer S. Li Duke University
Thomas J. Walsh
Thomas J. Walsh Weill Cornell Medicine
William J. Steinbach
William J. Steinbach Duke University
Vance G. Fowler
Vance G. Fowler Duke University
William W. Hope
William W. Hope University of Liverpool
John S. Bradley
John S. Bradley University of California, San Diego
John R. Perfect
John R. Perfect Duke University
Robert M. Califf
Robert M. Califf Duke University
Barbara J. Stoll
Barbara J. Stoll The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring the field of medicine in the USA opens the door to many rewarding online degree options and career paths beyond traditional medical school. As the healthcare workforce evolves, many students consider alternative educational routes that offer flexibility, affordability, and practical skills.

Entry-level professionals can begin with medical billing and coding classes online, gaining vital administrative expertise in healthcare systems. For those interested in patient care, nursing programs are a popular pathway. Many aspiring nurses look for the cheapest bsn programs online, which prepare them for licensure as registered nurses.

Advancing in the nursing profession is more accessible with flexible online offerings. Those pursuing advanced practice roles can explore cheap online fnp programs to become family nurse practitioners. Nurse leaders and educators might consider the cheapest online dnp programs to achieve the highest clinical and academic credentials.

These online pathways provide a range of accessible options for those interested in healthcare careers, whether entering the field or seeking advanced qualifications.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel K. Benjamin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles