World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 95 9979 9363 5136 4745 341 37286

David V. Glidden publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David V. Glidden between 1991 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David V. Glidden published across 36 years, from 1991 to 2026, averaging 11.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 40 publications in 2021. 38 of the 426 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 40. Peak 40 publications in 2021. 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 4 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 15 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 14 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 22 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 23 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 25 publications 2020: 22 publications 2021: 40 publications 2022: 18 publications 2023: 25 publications 2024: 27 publications 2025: 37 publications 2026: 1 publication
1991 2026

426 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David V. Glidden: publications per year, 1991 to 2026
Year Publications
1991 1
1992 0
1993 0
1994 1
1995 0
1996 1
1997 1
1998 1
1999 4
2000 3
2001 7
2002 15
2003 5
2004 14
2005 5
2006 7
2007 10
2008 10
2009 14
2010 6
2011 11
2012 22
2013 6
2014 17
2015 17
2016 23
2017 16
2018 14
2019 25
2020 22
2021 40
2022 18
2023 25
2024 27
2025 37
2026 1
Total 426
Download as CSV

David V. Glidden publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David V. Glidden sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 341–360 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 341 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922 341
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

David V. Glidden D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David V. Glidden sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 94–95 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808 95
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

David V. Glidden is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of medicine, with a focus on infectious diseases, epidemiology, and virology. Their work also touches on clinical psychology and neurology, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach to health science.

The scientist's research topics include HIV/AIDS research and interventions, HIV-related drug use and sexual risk, HIV treatment, COVID-19 clinical research, long-term effects of COVID-19, HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment, and broader SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 studies.

Frequent publication venues for their work include Clinical Infectious Diseases, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Open Forum Infectious Diseases, UNC Libraries, and AIDS.

Coauthors frequently collaborating with David V. Glidden include Matthew A. Spinelli, Monica Gandhi, Jeffrey N. Martin, Michael J. Peluso, and Steven G. Deeks.

Among their recent papers are:

  • Markers of Immune Activation and Inflammation in Individuals With Postacute Sequelae of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection, 2021, The Journal of Infectious Diseases
  • SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence, and IgG concentration and pseudovirus neutralising antibody titres after infection, compared by HIV status: a matched case-control observational study, 2021, The Lancet HIV
  • Viral suppression rates in a safety-net HIV clinic in San Francisco destabilized during COVID-19, 2020, AIDS
  • Demonstration Project of Long-Acting Antiretroviral Therapy in a Diverse Population of People With HIV, 2023, Annals of Internal Medicine
  • Importance of non-pharmaceutical interventions in lowering the viral inoculum to reduce susceptibility to infection by SARS-CoV-2 and potentially disease severity, 2021, The Lancet Infectious Diseases

Best Publications

  • Preexposure Chemoprophylaxis for HIV Prevention in Men Who Have Sex with Men

    Robert M. Grant;Javier R. Lama;Peter L. Anderson;Vanessa McMahan

  • Regression Methods in Biostatistics: Linear, Logistic, Survival, and Repeated Measures Models

    Eric Vittinghoff;David V. Glidden;Stephen C. Shiboski;Charles E. McCulloch

  • Uptake of pre-exposure prophylaxis, sexual practices, and HIV incidence in men and transgender women who have sex with men: a cohort study

    Robert M. Grant;Robert M. Grant;Robert M. Grant;Peter L. Anderson;Vanessa McMahan;Albert Liu

  • Emtricitabine-tenofovir concentrations and pre-exposure prophylaxis efficacy in men who have sex with men.

    Peter L. Anderson;David V. Glidden;Albert Liu;Susan Buchbinder

  • Abnormal Brain Development in Newborns with Congenital Heart Disease

    Steven P. Miller;Patrick S. McQuillen;Shannon Hamrick;Duan Xu

  • Evidence for α-synuclein prions causing multiple system atrophy in humans with parkinsonism

    Stanley B. Prusiner;Amanda L. Woerman;Daniel A. Mordes;Joel C. Watts

  • Patterns of brain injury in term neonatal encephalopathy

    Steven P. Miller;Vijay Ramaswamy;David Michelson;A. James Barkovich

  • Early brain injury in premature newborns detected with magnetic resonance imaging is associated with adverse early neurodevelopmental outcome.

    Steven P. Miller;Donna M. Ferriero;Carol Leonard;Robert Piecuch

  • High Prevalence of Peripheral Arterial Disease in Persons With Renal Insufficiency Results From the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999–2000

    Ann M. O’Hare;David V. Glidden;Caroline S. Fox;Chi-yuan Hsu

  • Pediatric acute lung injury: prospective evaluation of risk factors associated with mortality.

    Heidi R. Flori;David V. Glidden;George W. Rutherford;Michael A. Matthay

  • Clinical Neonatal Seizures are Independently Associated with Outcome in Infants at Risk for Hypoxic-Ischemic Brain Injury

    Hannah C. Glass;David Glidden;Rita J. Jeremy;A. James Barkovich

  • Seizure-associated brain injury in term newborns with perinatal asphyxia

    S. P. Miller;J. Weiss;A. Barnwell;D. M. Ferriero

  • High-resolution CT imaging of carotid artery atherosclerotic plaques.

    Max Wintermark;Sumayya Jawadi;J. H. Rapp;T. Tihan

  • Physical examination: Mallampati score as an independent predictor of obstructive sleep apnea.

    Thomas J Nuckton;David V Glidden;Warren S Browner;Warren S Browner;David M Claman

  • Temporal and Anatomic Risk Profile of Brain Injury With Neonatal Repair of Congenital Heart Defects

    Patrick S. McQuillen;A. James Barkovich;Shannon E.G. Hamrick;Marta Perez

  • Clinical characteristics of African Americans vs Caucasian Americans with multiple sclerosis

    B. A.C. Cree;O. Khan;D. Bourdette;D. S. Goodin

  • Trends in severe brain injury and neurodevelopmental outcome in premature newborn infants: the role of cystic periventricular leukomalacia.

    Shannon E.G. Hamrick;Steven P. Miller;Carol Leonard;David V. Glidden

  • Understanding Reasons for and Outcomes of Patients Lost to Follow-Up in Antiretroviral Therapy Programs in Africa Through a Sampling-Based Approach

    Elvin H Geng;David R Bangsberg;Nicolas Musinguzi;Nneka Emenyonu

  • Asymptomatic Deer Excrete Infectious Prions in Faeces

    Gültekin Tamgüney;Michael W. Miller;Lisa L. Wolfe;Tracey M. Sirochman

  • HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis in transgender women: a subgroup analysis of the iPrEx trial

    Madeline B Deutsch;David V Glidden;Jae Sevelius;Joanne Keatley

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert M. Grant
Robert M. Grant University of California, San Francisco
Steven P. Miller
Steven P. Miller University of Toronto
Donna M. Ferriero
Donna M. Ferriero University of California, San Francisco
Peter L. Anderson
Peter L. Anderson University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
A. James Barkovich
A. James Barkovich University of California, San Francisco
Kenneth H. Mayer
Kenneth H. Mayer Harvard Medical School
Susan Buchbinder
Susan Buchbinder University of California, San Francisco
Jeffrey N. Martin
Jeffrey N. Martin University of California, San Francisco
Mauro Schechter
Mauro Schechter Federal University of Rio de Janeiro
Linda-Gail Bekker
Linda-Gail Bekker University of Cape Town

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative healthcare degrees online can expand your career options beyond traditional medical school. A health care administration online degree is a popular option for students interested in leadership or management roles within healthcare facilities, clinics, and hospitals. This pathway focuses on building effective organizational and management skills that are vital for running healthcare organizations.

Graduates can further advance their expertise and qualifications by enrolling in the cheapest mha online programs, which offer a more affordable route to a Master’s in Healthcare Administration while maintaining flexibility for working professionals.

For those with a nursing background, pursuing the cheapest online bsn to dnp programs allows RNs to reach the highest level of clinical practice in nursing through a convenient online format.

Similarly, future pharmacists can benefit from flexible pharmd online programs designed to accommodate working students or those seeking cost-effective education options.

Each of these pathways opens new doors to rewarding and impactful healthcare careers—all with the added advantage of online learning and affordability.

Best Scientists Citing David V. Glidden

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles