World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
36
Citations
4941
World Ranking
7141
National Ranking
136

Heike Lischke publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Heike Lischke sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 104 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Heike Lischke D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Heike Lischke sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Heike Lischke is affiliated with the Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research in Switzerland. Their research primarily focuses on Environmental Science, with significant contributions across related subfields such as Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change, Ecological Modeling, Atmospheric Science, and Ecology.

The main topics of their work include:

  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Forest ecology and management
  • Tree-ring climate responses
  • Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Tree Root and Stability Studies

Lischke has published extensively in several venues, notably:

  • Frontiers in Forests and Global Change
  • Ecology and Evolution
  • Ecosphere
  • Geoscientific Model Development
  • Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution

Selected recent papers illustrate the thematic scope and collaboration network of Lischke:

  • "Tackling unresolved questions in forest ecology: The past and future role of simulation models" (2021) published in Ecology and Evolution
  • "Competition and demography rather than dispersal limitation slow down upward shifts of trees' upper elevation limits in the Alps" (2020) published in Journal of Ecology
  • "How robust are future projections of forest landscape dynamics? Insights from a systematic comparison of four forest landscape models" (2020) published in Environmental Modelling & Software
  • "Linking functional traits and demography to model species-rich communities" (2021) published in Nature Communications
  • "Scaling methods in ecological modelling" (2020) published in Methods in Ecology and Evolution

Frequent collaborators in their work include Christine Moos, Antoine Guisan, Deborah Zani, Veiko Lehsten, and Harald Bugmann. These coauthors have been involved in multiple joint publications, showing ongoing partnerships contributing to topics related to forest ecology and environmental science modeling.

Best Publications

  • Terrestrial and Inland Water Systems

    Josef Settele;Robert Scholes;Richard A Betts;Stuart Bunn

  • Forecasting Regional to Global Plant Migration in Response to Climate Change

    Ronald P. Neilson;Louis F. Pitelka;Allen M. Solomon;Ran Nathan

  • Biotic interactions in species distribution modelling: 10 questions to guide interpretation and avoid false conclusions

    Carsten F. Dormann;Maria Bobrowski;D. Matthias Dehling;David J. Harris

  • Climate, competition and connectivity affect future migration and ranges of European trees

    Eliane S. Meier;Heike Lischke;Dirk R. Schmatz;Niklaus E. Zimmermann

  • TreeMig: A forest-landscape model for simulating spatio-temporal patterns from stand to landscape scale

    Heike Lischke;Niklaus E. Zimmermann;Janine Bolliger;Sophie Rickebusch

  • The past and future of modeling forest dynamics: from growth and yield curves to forest landscape models

    Stephen R. Shifley;Hong S. He;Heike Lischke;Wen J. Wang

  • Plant functional type mapping for earth system models

    B. Poulter;P. Ciais;E. Hodson;H. Lischke

  • Swiss National Forest Inventory: Methods and Models of the Second Assessment

    Unknown

  • Tree migration-rates: narrowing the gap between inferred post-glacial rates and projected rates

    Angelica Feurdean;Shonil A. Bhagwat;Katherine J. Willis;Katherine J. Willis;H. John B Birks;H. John B Birks;H. John B Birks

  • Climate change alters elevational phenology patterns of the European spruce bark beetle (Ips typographus).

    Oliver Jakoby;Heike Lischke;Beat Wermelinger

  • Using dynamic vegetation models to simulate plant range shifts

    Rebecca S. Snell;Andreas Huth;J. E. M. S. Nabel;J. E. M. S. Nabel;Greta Bocedi

  • A model-based reconstruction of Holocene treeline dynamics in the Central Swiss Alps

    Caroline Heiri;Harald Bugmann;Willy Tinner;Oliver Heiri

  • Sustainable land use in Mountain Regions under global change synthesis across scales and disciplines

    Robert Huber;Andreas Rigling;Peter Bebi;Fridolin Simon Brand

  • Vegetation responses to rapid warming and to minor climatic fluctuations during the Late-Glacial Interstadial (GI-1) at Gerzensee (Switzerland)

    Brigitta Ammann;Jacqueline F. N. van Leeuwen;Willem Oscar van der Knaap;Heike Lischke

  • Tree species composition in European pristine forests: Comparison of stand data to model predictions

    Franz W. Badeck;Heike Lischke;Harald Bugmann;Thomas Hickler

  • A greener Greenland? Climatic potential and long-term constraints on future expansions of trees and shrubs

    Signe Normand;Christophe Randin;Ralf Ohlemüller;Christian Bay

  • AGGREGATION OF INDIVIDUAL TREES AND PATCHES IN FOREST SUCCESSION MODELS : CAPTURING VARIABILITY WITH HEIGHT STRUCTURED, RANDOM, SPATIAL DISTRIBUTIONS

    Heike Lischke;Thomas J. Löffler;Andreas Fischlin

  • Cost of resistance and tolerance under competition: the defense-stress benefit hypothesis

    David H. Siemens;Heike Lischke;Nicole Maggiulli;Stéphanie Schürch

  • Tackling unresolved questions in forest ecology: The past and future role of simulation models

    Isabelle Maréchaux;Fanny Langerwisch;Andreas Huth;Andreas Huth;Harald Bugmann

  • Vegetation responses to climate change in the Alps: modeling Studies

    H. Lischke;A. Guisan;A. Fischlin;J. Williams

  • Effects of climate, fire, and humans on forest dynamics: forest simulations compared to the palaeological record

    Franziska Keller;Heike Lischke;Thomas Mathis;Adrian Möhl

  • Predicting individual-tree growth of central European tree species as a function of site, stand, management, nutrient, and climate effects

    Brigitte Rohner;Peter Waldner;Heike Lischke;Marco Ferretti

Frequent Co-Authors

Harald Bugmann
Harald Bugmann ETH Zurich
Julia E. M. S. Nabel
Julia E. M. S. Nabel Max Planck Society
Niklaus E. Zimmermann
Niklaus E. Zimmermann Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
Antoine Guisan
Antoine Guisan University of Lausanne
Massimiliano Zappa
Massimiliano Zappa Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
Jed O. Kaplan
Jed O. Kaplan University of Calgary
Willy Tinner
Willy Tinner University of Bern
Thomas Hickler
Thomas Hickler Goethe University Frankfurt
Brigitta Ammann
Brigitta Ammann University of Bern
Oliver Heiri
Oliver Heiri University of Basel

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Ecology and Evolution, exploring alternative online degrees can open up diverse career opportunities. Many graduates pursue advanced roles in research, environmental policy, or education—fields that often benefit from interdisciplinary training.

For those considering healthcare or science education, msn direct entry programs online provide a fast path for non-nurses to enter the healthcare industry. Similarly, registered nurses looking to advance their credentials may compare popular options like capella vs chamberlain rn to bsn online programs to find the best fit for their needs.

Bridging educational gaps is also possible with bsn to msn online programs, which cater to nursing professionals seeking leadership roles. When selecting a program, students should prioritize quality and accreditation—many of the non profit colleges highlighted online deliver flexible, reputable training recognized by employers.

Whether your passion blends ecology, education, or healthcare, online degrees provide flexible pathways to pursue impactful careers in science and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Heike Lischke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles