World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Emily Ho

Emily Ho

Last Updated:

D-Index & Metrics

?
Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Biology and Biochemistry 63 10301 9512 4487 4037 175 12981

Emily Ho publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Emily Ho between 1999 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Emily Ho published across 28 years, from 1999 to 2026, averaging 8.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2023. 17 of the 228 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2023. 1999: 2 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 17 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 16 publications 2026: 1 publication
1999 2026

228 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Emily Ho: publications per year, 1999 to 2026
Year Publications
1999 2
2000 2
2001 2
2002 1
2003 1
2004 2
2005 4
2006 9
2007 7
2008 6
2009 10
2010 14
2011 13
2012 13
2013 14
2014 11
2015 10
2016 10
2017 16
2018 6
2019 5
2020 8
2021 9
2022 10
2023 17
2024 9
2025 16
2026 1
Total 228
Download as CSV

Emily Ho publications per year - data summary

  • Emily Ho, a Biology and Biochemistry scholar from Oregon State University, has 228 publications recorded across 28 years, from 1999 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1999 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive year is 2023, with 17 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 2002, 2003 and 2026, with 1 publication each.
  • The rate of publication averages 8.1 papers per year over the whole span, or 8.1 per year counting only the 28 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 53 publications, 23% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1999-2008: 36 publications (3.6 per year); 2009-2018: 117 publications (11.7 per year); 2019-2026: 75 publications (9.4 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Emily Ho publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emily Ho sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 1,028+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 980. Most scientists, 980, have 127–136 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 167–176 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientist 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientist 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 175 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 8
57–66 35
67–76 106
77–86 231
87–96 413
97–106 546
107–116 704
117–126 848
127–136 980
137–146 942
147–156 969
157–166 949
167–176 951 175
177–186 915
187–196 787
197–206 840
207–216 733
217–226 708
227–236 651
237–246 605
247–256 510
257–266 524
267–276 434
277–286 417
287–296 350
297–306 363
307–316 315
317–326 296
327–336 261
337–346 240
347–356 219
357–366 196
367–376 154
377–386 161
387–396 155
397–406 145
407–416 124
417–426 112
427–436 132
437–446 116
447–456 99
457–466 81
467–476 91
477–486 80
487–496 80
497–506 59
507–516 36
517–526 46
527–536 54
537–546 44
547–556 43
557–566 43
567–576 42
577–586 25
587–596 34
597–606 23
607–616 33
617–626 31
627–636 27
637–646 25
647–656 28
657–666 34
667–676 18
677–686 16
687–696 10
697–706 12
707–716 21
717–726 12
727–736 12
737–746 10
747–756 7
757–766 13
767–776 15
777–786 13
787–796 9
797–806 9
807–816 7
817–826 4
827–836 9
837–846 7
847–856 3
857–866 5
867–876 5
877–886 11
887–896 3
897–906 4
907–916 7
917–926 5
927–936 6
937–946 6
947–956 3
957–966 7
967–976 2
977–986 2
987–996 1
997–1,006 5
1,007–1,016 2
1,017–1,026 2
1,027 1
1,028+ 100
Download as CSV

Emily Ho publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 19,587 Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 100 ranges running from 47–56 to 1,028+ publications.
  • Emily Ho, a Biology and Biochemistry scholar from Oregon State University, records 175 publications - the 39th percentile of the discipline.
  • 39% of ranked Biology and Biochemistry scientists score the same or lower than Emily Ho, and about 61% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 197–206 publications range, and Emily Ho ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 127–136 publications, holding 980 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 77% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 287–296 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Emily Ho D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emily Ho sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 65 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 167+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,253. Most scientists, 1,253, have 58–59 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 62–63 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 80
42–43 183
44–45 316
46–47 504
48–49 718
50–51 899
52–53 1,025
54–55 1,149
56–57 1,235
58–59 1,253
60–61 1,162
62–63 1,130 63
64–65 1,031
66–67 897
68–69 814
70–71 714
72–73 709
74–75 596
76–77 512
78–79 473
80–81 412
82–83 373
84–85 358
86–87 285
88–89 273
90–91 227
92–93 208
94–95 193
96–97 153
98–99 157
100–101 148
102–103 120
104–105 113
106–107 100
108–109 86
110–111 67
112–113 71
114–115 73
116–117 64
118–119 53
120–121 60
122–123 54
124–125 43
126–127 38
128–129 49
130–131 26
132–133 18
134–135 23
136–137 32
138–139 32
140–141 27
142–143 19
144–145 22
146–147 12
148–149 16
150–151 14
152–153 10
154–155 13
156–157 10
158–159 7
160–161 9
162–163 13
164–165 4
166 4
167+ 98
Download as CSV

Emily Ho D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 19,587 Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 65 ranges running from 40–41 to 167+ D-Index.
  • Emily Ho, a Biology and Biochemistry scholar from Oregon State University, records 63 D-Index - the 49th percentile of the discipline.
  • 49% of ranked Biology and Biochemistry scientists score the same or lower than Emily Ho, and about 51% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 64–65 D-Index range, and Emily Ho ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 58–59 D-Index, holding 1,253 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 71% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 72–73 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Emily Ho is affiliated with Oregon State University in the United States and has a research focus largely situated within the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Their scientific output includes work spanning molecular biology, nutrition and dietetics, health toxicology and mutagenesis, epidemiology, and genetics.

The scientist has contributed to multiple research topics related to health and nutrition, including trace elements in health, genomics in relation to phytochemicals and oxidative stress, gut microbiota and health, heavy metal exposure and toxicity, HIV-related health complications and treatments, child nutrition and water access, and the interplay of nutrition, genetics, and disease.

Frequent collaborators of Emily Ho include Carmen P. Wong, Laura M. Beaver, Thomas J. Sharpton, John A. Bouranis, and Jaewoo Choi. Their research has often been published in venues such as Current Developments in Nutrition, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Advances in Nutrition, Frontiers in Nutrition, and Nutrients.

Key publications by Emily Ho include:

  • Impact of zinc on DNA integrity and age-related inflammation, 2021, Free Radical Biology and Medicine

Other notable recent papers related to their field of study and frequently coauthored with other researchers are:

  • Research gaps and opportunities in precision nutrition: an NIH workshop report, 2022, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
  • Effects of zinc status on age-related T cell dysfunction and chronic inflammation, 2021, BioMetals
  • Metabolic Fate of Dietary Glucosinolates and Their Metabolites: A Role for the Microbiome, 2021, Frontiers in Nutrition
  • Interplay between Cruciferous Vegetables and the Gut Microbiome: A Multi-Omic Approach, 2022, Nutrients

The breadth of Emily Ho's research reflects interdisciplinary expertise, combining molecular biology techniques with nutrition and epidemiological insights to explore how trace elements and dietary components influence human health and disease mechanisms.

Best Publications

  • Multi-targeted prevention of cancer by sulforaphane.

    John D. Clarke;Roderick H. Dashwood;Emily Ho

  • Zinc deficiency, DNA damage and cancer risk.

    Emily Ho

  • Low intracellular zinc induces oxidative DNA damage, disrupts p53, NFκB, and AP1 DNA binding, and affects DNA repair in a rat glioma cell line

    Emily Ho;Bruce N. Ames

  • Sulforaphane inhibits histone deacetylase in vivo and suppresses tumorigenesis in Apcmin mice

    Melinda C. Myzak;W. Mohaiza Dashwood;Gayle A. Orner;Emily Ho

  • Sulforaphane Retards the Growth of Human PC-3 Xenografts and Inhibits HDAC Activity in Human Subjects

    Melinda C. Myzak;Philip Tong;Wan-Mohaiza Dashwood;Roderick H. Dashwood

  • Sulforaphane inhibits histone deacetylase activity in BPH-1, LnCaP and PC-3 prostate epithelial cells

    Melinda C. Myzak;Karin Hardin;Rong Wang;Roderick H. Dashwood

  • Dietary histone deacetylase inhibitors: from cells to mice to man.

    Roderick H. Dashwood;Emily Ho

  • Zinc Deficiency Induces Oxidative DNA Damage and Increases P53 Expression in Human Lung Fibroblasts

    Emily Ho;Chantal Courtemanche;Chantal Courtemanche;Bruce N. Ames;Bruce N. Ames

  • Dietary Sulforaphane, a Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor for Cancer Prevention

    Emily Ho;John D. Clarke;Roderick H. Dashwood

  • Antioxidants, NFkappaB activation, and diabetogenesis.

    Emily Ho;Tammy M. Bray

  • Zinc Deficiency Affects DNA Damage, Oxidative Stress, Antioxidant Defenses, and DNA Repair in Rats

    Yang Song;Scott W. Leonard;Maret G. Traber;Emily Ho

  • Rapamycin inhibits the secretory phenotype of senescent cells by a Nrf2-independent mechanism.

    Rong Wang;Zhen Yu;Bharath Sunchu;James Shoaf

  • Dietary HDAC inhibitors: time to rethink weak ligands in cancer chemoprevention?

    Roderick H. Dashwood;Melinda C. Myzak;Emily Ho

  • Xanthohumol, a prenylflavonoid derived from hops induces apoptosis and inhibits NF-kappaB activation in prostate epithelial cells.

    Emily C. Colgate;Cristobal L. Miranda;Jan F. Stevens;Tammy M. Bray

  • Dietary Phytochemicals, HDAC Inhibition, and DNA Damage/Repair Defects in Cancer Cells

    Praveen Rajendran;Emily Ho;David E Williams;Roderick H Dashwood

  • Bioavailability and inter-conversion of sulforaphane and erucin in human subjects consuming broccoli sprouts or broccoli supplement in a cross-over study design

    John D. Clarke;Anna Hsu;Ken Riedl;Deborah Bella

  • Modulation of histone deacetylase activity by dietary isothiocyanates and allyl sulfides: Studies with sulforaphane and garlic organosulfur compounds

    Hui Nian;Barbara Delage;Emily Ho;Roderick H. Dashwood

  • Supplementation of N-acetylcysteine inhibits NFκB activation and protects against alloxan-induced diabetes in CD-1 mice

    Emily Ho;Gouman Chen;Tammy M. Bray

  • Differential effects of sulforaphane on histone deacetylases, cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in normal prostate cells versus hyperplastic and cancerous prostate cells.

    John D. Clarke;Anna Hsu;Zhen Yu;Roderick H. Dashwood

  • Zinc deficiency enhanced inflammatory response by increasing immune cell activation and inducing IL6 promoter demethylation.

    Carmen P. Wong;Nicole A. Rinaldi;Emily Ho

Imed Bouchrika, PhD

Data reviewed by: Imed Bouchrika, PhD

Frequent Co-Authors

Roderick H. Dashwood
Roderick H. Dashwood Texas A&M University
David E. Williams
David E. Williams Oregon State University
Jan F. Stevens
Jan F. Stevens Oregon State University
Maret G. Traber
Maret G. Traber Oregon State University
Jeff H. Chang
Jeff H. Chang Oregon State University
Bruce N. Ames
Bruce N. Ames University of California, Berkeley
Robert L. Tanguay
Robert L. Tanguay Oregon State University
Rashmi Sinha
Rashmi Sinha National Institutes of Health
Penny M. Kris-Etherton
Penny M. Kris-Etherton Pennsylvania State University
Meredith Yeager
Meredith Yeager Hood College

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry opens doors to diverse professional opportunities, many of which now offer flexible online pathways. For students interested in advancing their careers in healthcare and science, a wealth of accredited programs are available through online study.

If you are looking to lead in nursing, a doctor of nursing practice can elevate your expertise without the need for on-site clinicals. Those aiming for leadership or administrative roles in hospitals and health organizations may consider enrolling in online doctoral programs healthcare administration to sharpen their management skills.

The expanding field of pharmacy offers another option to those with a background in the sciences; online pharm d programs prepare graduates for advanced clinical and research roles. Meanwhile, for students passionate about fitness, rehabilitation, or public health, an online bachelor's degree in exercise science provides foundational knowledge and practical skills.

By considering these related degrees, Biology and Biochemistry students can diversify their expertise and position themselves for rewarding, future-focused careers.

Best Scientists Citing Emily Ho

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles