World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
32
Citations
4878
World Ranking
13094
National Ranking
5266

Shoaib Kamil publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shoaib Kamil sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 93 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Shoaib Kamil D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shoaib Kamil sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Shoaib Kamil is affiliated with Adobe Systems in the United States. Their research spans core areas within computer science and engineering, with a particular emphasis on hardware and architecture, computer vision and pattern recognition, and computer graphics and computer-aided design. Additional subfields include computational mechanics and signal processing.

The scientist's work is primarily focused on topics related to parallel computing and optimization techniques, computer graphics and visualization techniques, and embedded systems design techniques. Other research interests include 3D shape modeling and analysis, numerical methods and algorithms, advanced data storage technologies, and advanced optimization algorithms research.

Frequent collaborators in Shoaib Kamil's research include Teseo Schneider, Daniele Panozzo, Xuan Tang, Changwan Hong, and Saman Amarasinghe.

Recent publications by Shoaib Kamil encompass the following papers:

  • "A sparse iteration space transformation framework for sparse tensor algebra," 2020, Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages
  • "NASOQ," 2020, ACM Transactions on Graphics
  • "Verifying and improving Halide's term rewriting system with program synthesis," 2020, Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages
  • "Searching for Fast Demosaicking Algorithms," 2022, ACM Transactions on Graphics
  • "Sparsity-Specific Code Optimization using Expression Trees," 2022, ACM Transactions on Graphics

Shoaib Kamil has contributed multiple times to notable publication venues, including:

  • ACM Transactions on Graphics (5 publications)
  • Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages (2 publications)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (2 publications)
  • Computer Graphics Forum (1 publication)
  • Materials Today Proceedings (1 publication)

Their research outputs reflect a sustained engagement with computational techniques and optimization methods applicable to graphics processing, hardware architecture, and algorithmic improvements. This work intersects with both theoretical and applied aspects of their fields of study.

Best Publications

  • OpenTuner: an extensible framework for program autotuning

    Jason Ansel;Shoaib Kamil;Kalyan Veeramachaneni;Jonathan Ragan-Kelley

  • The potential of the cell processor for scientific computing

    Samuel Williams;John Shalf;Leonid Oliker;Shoaib Kamil

  • The Tensor Algebra Compiler

    Fredrik Kjolstad;Shoaib Kamil;Stephen Chou;David Lugato

  • The tensor algebra compiler

    Fredrik Kjolstad;Shoaib Kamil;Stephen Chou;David Lugato

  • Optimization and Performance Modeling of Stencil Computations on Modern Microprocessors

    Kaushik Datta;Shoaib Kamil;Samuel Williams;Leonid Oliker

  • An auto-tuning framework for parallel multicore stencil computations

    Shoaib Kamil;Cy Chan;Leonid Oliker;John Shalf

  • Implicit and explicit optimizations for stencil computations

    Shoaib Kamil;Kaushik Datta;Samuel Williams;Leonid Oliker

  • GraphIt: a high-performance graph DSL

    Yunming Zhang;Mengjiao Yang;Riyadh Baghdadi;Shoaib Kamil

  • Performance Optimizations and Bounds for Sparse Matrix-Vector Multiply

    Richard Vuduc;James W. Demmel;Katherine A. Yelick;Shoaib Kamil

  • Scientific Computing Kernels on the Cell Processor

    Samuel W. Williams;John Shalf;Leonid Oliker;Shoaib Kamil

  • Tiramisu: a polyhedral compiler for expressing fast and portable code

    Riyadh Baghdadi;Jessica Ray;Malek Ben Romdhane;Emanuele Del Sozzo

  • Communication-Optimal Parallel Recursive Rectangular Matrix Multiplication

    James Demmel;David Eliahu;Armando Fox;Shoaib Kamil

  • SEJITS: Getting Productivity and Performance With Selective Embedded JIT Specialization

    Bryan Catanzaro;Shoaib Ashraf Kamil;Yunsup Lee;Krste Asanovic

  • Impact of modern memory subsystems on cache optimizations for stencil computations

    Shoaib Kamil;Parry Husbands;Leonid Oliker;John Shalf

  • Power efficiency in high performance computing

    S. Kamil;J. Shalf;E. Strohmaier

  • Tiramisu: A Polyhedral Compiler for Expressing Fast and Portable Code

    Riyadh Baghdadi;Jessica Ray;Malek Ben Romdhane;Emanuele Del Sozzo

  • Analyzing Ultra-Scale Application Communication Requirements for a Reconfigurable Hybrid Interconnect

    John Shalf;Shoaib Kamil;Leonid Oliker;David Skinner

  • Analysis of photonic networks for a chip multiprocessor using scientific applications

    Gilbert Hendry;Shoaib Kamil;Aleksandr Biberman;Johnnie Chan

  • Communication Requirements and Interconnect Optimization for High-End Scientific Applications

    S. Kamil;L. Oliker;A. Pinar;J. Shalf

  • Energy-Efficient Computing for Extreme-Scale Science

    D. Donofrio;L. Oliker;J. Shalf;M.F. Wehner

  • Verified lifting of stencil computations

    Shoaib Kamil;Alvin Cheung;Shachar Itzhaky;Armando Solar-Lezama

  • The Potential of the Cell Processor for Scientific Computing

    Samuel Williams;John Shalf;Leonid Oliker;Parry Husbands

Frequent Co-Authors

John Shalf
John Shalf Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Leonid Oliker
Leonid Oliker Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Katherine Yelick
Katherine Yelick University of California, Berkeley
Armando Fox
Armando Fox University of California, Berkeley
Samuel Williams
Samuel Williams Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Ali Pinar
Ali Pinar Sandia National Laboratories
James Demmel
James Demmel University of California, Berkeley
Aydin Buluc
Aydin Buluc Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The field of computer science shares strong connections with related STEM disciplines. Many students considering a computer science degree may also be interested in specialized online programs that can expand their career opportunities.

For those focused on sustainability and technology, an environmental engineering bachelor's degree online offers the foundation needed to design solutions for today’s environmental challenges. If your passion leans toward machine design or manufacturing systems, pursuing an online degree for mechanical engineering can open doors to a broad variety of technical careers.

Curious about the underlying laws of nature? Programs offering online physics degrees combine foundational theory with practical skills sought after in research, engineering, and data analysis roles. Those aiming to specialize further might explore the cheapest master in data science options, which prepare graduates for high-demand roles in analytics, AI, and big data.

Exploring these related online degrees not only broadens your academic horizons, but also enhances your flexibility and employability in the growing tech-driven workforce.

Best Scientists Citing Shoaib Kamil

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles