World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Torsten Hoefler

Torsten Hoefler

Award Badge
Computer Science
Switzerland
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 67 2222 2155 50 50 429 15170

Torsten Hoefler publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Torsten Hoefler between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Torsten Hoefler published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 22.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 65 publications in 2022. 110 of the 614 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 65. Peak 65 publications in 2022. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 3 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 17 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 19 publications 2014: 32 publications 2015: 21 publications 2016: 21 publications 2017: 28 publications 2018: 20 publications 2019: 42 publications 2020: 38 publications 2021: 56 publications 2022: 65 publications 2023: 63 publications 2024: 54 publications 2025: 56 publications
1999 2025

614 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Torsten Hoefler: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 0
2004 1
2005 3
2006 14
2007 9
2008 14
2009 10
2010 13
2011 17
2012 17
2013 19
2014 32
2015 21
2016 21
2017 28
2018 20
2019 42
2020 38
2021 56
2022 65
2023 63
2024 54
2025 56
Total 614
Download as CSV

Torsten Hoefler publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Torsten Hoefler sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 422–431 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 429 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99 429
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Torsten Hoefler D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Torsten Hoefler sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 66–67 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249 67
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Switzerland Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Switzerland Leader Award
  • 2020 - ACM Senior Member
  • 2019 - ACM Gordon Bell Prize For A Data-Centric Approach to Extreme-Scale Ab initio Dissipative Quantum Transport Simulations

Overview

Torsten Hoefler is affiliated with ETH Zurich in Switzerland and specializes in the field of Computer Science. Their research encompasses a range of subfields, including Computer Networks and Communications, Artificial Intelligence, Hardware and Architecture, Information Systems, and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

The scientist's main topics of work involve Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques, Cloud Computing and Resource Management, Interconnection Networks and Systems, Advanced Data Storage Technologies, Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems, Graph Theory and Algorithms, and Software-Defined Networks and 5G.

Hoefler has contributed extensively to several publication venues, with the most frequent being arXiv (Cornell University), Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich), IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, and IEEE Transactions on Computers.

Recent significant papers include:

  • Sparsity in Deep Learning: Pruning and growth for efficient inference and training in neural networks, 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Sparsity in Deep Learning: Pruning and growth for efficient inference and training in neural networks, 2021, Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich)
  • Graph of Thoughts: Solving Elaborate Problems with Large Language Models, 2024, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • The digital revolution of Earth-system science, 2021, Nature Computational Science
  • GPTQ: Accurate Post-Training Quantization for Generative Pre-trained Transformers, 2022, arXiv (Cornell University)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Hoefler include Maciej Besta, Tal Ben-Nun, Salvatore Di Girolamo, Marcin Copik, and Daniele De Sensi.

Torsten Hoefler's honors include the ACM Senior Member designation received in 2020 and the ACM Gordon Bell Prize awarded in 2019 for work titled "A Data-Centric Approach to Extreme-Scale Ab initio Dissipative Quantum Transport Simulations."

Best Publications

  • Demystifying Parallel and Distributed Deep Learning: An In-depth Concurrency Analysis

    Tal Ben-Nun;Torsten Hoefler

  • The Convergence of Sparsified Gradient Methods

    Dan Alistarh;Torsten Hoefler;Mikael Johansson;Nikola Konstantinov

  • Slim fly: a cost effective low-diameter network topology

    Maciej Besta;Torsten Hoefler

  • Characterizing the Influence of System Noise on Large-Scale Applications by Simulation

    Torsten Hoefler;Timo Schneider;Andrew Lumsdaine

  • Generic topology mapping strategies for large-scale parallel architectures

    Torsten Hoefler;Marc Snir

  • The PERCS High-Performance Interconnect

    Baba Arimilli;Ravi Arimilli;Vicente Chung;Scott Clark

  • Scientific benchmarking of parallel computing systems: twelve ways to tell the masses when reporting performance results

    Torsten Hoefler;Roberto Belli

  • GPTQ: Accurate Post-Training Quantization for Generative Pre-trained Transformers

    Unknown

  • Implementation and performance analysis of non-blocking collective operations for MPI

    Torsten Hoefler;Andrew Lumsdaine;Wolfgang Rehm

  • LogGOPSim: simulating large-scale applications in the LogGOPS model

    Torsten Hoefler;Timo Schneider;Andrew Lumsdaine

  • The digital revolution of Earth-system science

    Peter Bauer;Peter D. Dueben;Torsten Hoefler;Tiago Quintino

  • Enabling highly scalable remote memory access programming with MPI-3 one sided

    Robert Gerstenberger;Maciej Besta;Torsten Hoefler

  • Using automated performance modeling to find scalability bugs in complex codes

    Alexandru Calotoiu;Torsten Hoefler;Marius Poke;Felix Wolf

  • Deep learning for post-processing ensemble weather forecasts

    Peter Grönquist;Chengyuan Yao;Tal Ben-Nun;Nikoli Dryden

  • Near-global climate simulation at 1 km resolution: establishing a performance baseline on 4888 GPUs with COSMO 5.0

    Oliver Fuhrer;Tarun Chadha;Torsten Hoefler;Grzegorz Kwasniewski

  • DARE: High-Performance State Machine Replication on RDMA Networks

    Marius Poke;Torsten Hoefler

  • To Push or To Pull: On Reducing Communication and Synchronization in Graph Computations

    Maciej Besta;Michał Podstawski;Linus Groner;Edgar Solomonik

  • Using Advanced MPI: Modern Features of the Message-Passing Interface

    William Gropp;Torsten Hoefler;Rajeev Thakur;Ewing Lusk

  • Augment Your Batch: Improving Generalization Through Instance Repetition

    Elad Hoffer;Tal Ben-Nun;Itay Hubara;Niv Giladi

  • Multistage switches are not crossbars: Effects of static routing in high-performance networks

    T. Hoefler;T. Schneider;A. Lumsdaine

  • Message progression in parallel computing - to thread or not to thread?

    T. Hoefler;A. Lumsdaine

  • SeBS: a serverless benchmark suite for function-as-a-service computing

    Marcin Copik;Grzegorz Kwasniewski;Maciej Besta;Michal Podstawski

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew Lumsdaine
Andrew Lumsdaine Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
William Gropp
William Gropp University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Rajeev Thakur
Rajeev Thakur Argonne National Laboratory
Felix Wolf
Felix Wolf Technical University of Darmstadt
Ewing Lusk
Ewing Lusk Argonne National Laboratory
Luca Benini
Luca Benini ETH Zurich
Gustavo Alonso
Gustavo Alonso ETH Zurich
Dan Alistarh
Dan Alistarh Institute of Science and Technology Austria
Marc Snir
Marc Snir University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring additional online degree options can open new doors for computer science students in the USA. Many look for flexible and affordable programs to accelerate their studies or diversify their expertise.

For those interested in business leadership alongside technology, the cheapest mba programs can provide valuable management skills at a lower cost. Alternatively, learners seeking advanced credentials in less time may consider a one year masters degree, allowing for a quick transition into higher-paying roles.

If you’re focused on entering the workforce fast, researching the fastest degree to get can help identify programs with excellent job prospects upon graduation. Additionally, with the rise of artificial intelligence across industries, pursuing degrees in ai can set students up for innovative and high-demand careers in tech.

These pathways offer flexibility, affordability, and strong job potential, making them popular choices for computer science students aiming to enhance their career opportunities in the rapidly evolving digital landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Torsten Hoefler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles