World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Mathematics
Saudi Arabia
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
46
Citations
10297
World Ranking
1340
National Ranking
12

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
50
Citations
12487
World Ranking
4013
National Ranking
29

David E. Keyes publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David E. Keyes sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 315 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

David E. Keyes D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David E. Keyes sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Mathematics in Saudi Arabia Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Mathematics in Saudi Arabia Leader Award
  • 2018 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 2013 - Fellow of the American Mathematical Society
  • 2011 - SIAM Fellow For contributions to implicit methods for the solution of partial differential equations and dedicated service to the scientific community.

Overview

David E. Keyes is affiliated with King Abdullah University of Science and Technology in Saudi Arabia. Their research primarily spans the fields of Computer Science and Engineering, with notable work in Computational Mechanics, Environmental Engineering, Geophysics, Computer Networks and Communications, and Computational Theory and Mathematics.

Their main topics of research include:

  • Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
  • Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
  • Matrix Theory and Algorithms
  • Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
  • Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
  • Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
  • Advanced Data Storage Technologies

Keyes has published extensively, with frequent appearances in the following venues:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • King Abdullah University of Science and Technology Repository
  • SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing
  • IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems
  • The International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications

The scientist's recent papers include:

  • "On the robustness and performance of entropy stable collocated discontinuous Galerkin methods" (2020), Journal of Computational Physics
  • "Accelerating Geostatistical Modeling and Prediction With Mixed-Precision Computations: A High-Productivity Approach With PaRSEC" (2021), IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems
  • "Hierarchical algorithms on hierarchical architectures" (2020), Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences
  • "Fully implicit hybrid two-level domain decomposition algorithms for two-phase flows in porous media on 3D unstructured grids" (2020), Journal of Computational Physics
  • "mpi4py.futures: MPI-Based Asynchronous Task Execution for Python" (2022), IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems

Frequent co-authors with whom Keyes collaborates include:

  • Hatem Ltaief
  • Marc G. Genton
  • Sameh Abdulah
  • George Turkiyyah
  • Ying Sun

The scientist has been recognized with several awards including the SIAM Fellow designation in 2011 for contributions to implicit methods for solving partial differential equations and service to the scientific community. In addition, they were named a Fellow of the American Mathematical Society in 2013 and a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in 2018.

Best Publications

  • Jacobian-free Newton-Krylov methods: a survey of approaches and applications

    D. A. Knoll;D. E. Keyes

  • The International Exascale Software Project roadmap

    Jack Dongarra;Pete Beckman;Terry Moore;Patrick Aerts

  • Multiphysics simulations: Challenges and opportunities

    David E Keyes;Lois C Mcinnes;Carol Woodward;William Gropp

  • Convergence Analysis of Pseudo-Transient Continuation

    C. T. Kelley;David E. Keyes

  • A comparison of domain decomposition techniques for elliptic partial differential equations and their parallel implementation

    David E. Keyes;William D. Gropp

  • Nonlinearly Preconditioned Inexact Newton Algorithms

    Xiao-Chuan Cai;David E. Keyes

  • Numerical Solution of Two-Dimensional Axisymmetric Laminar Diffusion Flames

    M. D. Smooke;R. E. Mitchell;D. E. Keyes

  • High-performacne parallel implicit CFD

    William D. Gropp;Dinesh K. Kaushik;David E. Keyes;Barry F. Smith

  • Large-Scale Inverse Problems and Quantification of Uncertainty

    Lorenz Biegler;George Biros;Omar Nabih Ghattas;Matthias Heinkenschloss

  • Parallel Newton--Krylov--Schwarz Algorithms for the Transonic Full Potential Equation

    Xiao-Chuan Cai;William D. Gropp;David E. Keyes;Robin G. Melvin

  • A Comparison Between Numerical Calculations and Experimental Measurements of the Structure of a Counterflow Methane-Air Diffusion Flame

    I. K. Puri;K. Seshadri;M. D. Smooke;D. E. Keyes

  • Pseudotransient Continuation and Differential-Algebraic Equations

    Todd S. Coffey;C. T. Kelley;David E. Keyes

  • Big data and extreme-scale computing: Pathways to Convergence-Toward a shaping strategy for a future software and data ecosystem for scientific inquiry

    M. Asch;T. Moore;R. Badia;M. Beck

  • Achieving High Sustained Performance in an Unstructured Mesh CFD Application

    W. K. Anderson;W. D. Gropp;D. K. Kaushik;D. E. Keyes

  • Towards Realistic Performance Bounds for Implicit CFD Codes

    W. D. Gropp;D. K. Kaushik;D. E. Keyes;B. F. Smith

  • Newton-Krylov-Schwarz Methods in CFD

    X.-C. Cai;W. D. Gropp;D. E. Keyes;M. D. Tidriri

  • Real-Time PDE-Constrained Optimization

    Lorenz T. Biegler;Omar Ghattas;Matthias Heinkenschloss;David Keyes

  • Globalized Newton-Krylov-Schwarz algorithms and software for parallel implicit CFD

    William Gropp;David Keyes;Lois Curfman Mcinnes;M. D. Tidriri

  • Modeling wildland fire propagation with level set methods

    V. Mallet;D. E. Keyes;F. E. Fendell

  • Iterative solution techniques in boundary element analysis

    J. H. Kane;D. E. Keyes;K. Guru Prasad

  • Domain Decomposition Methods in Science and Engineering XVI

    Olof B. Widlund;David E. Keyes

  • PARALLEL NEWTON-KRYLOV-SCHWARZ ALGORITHMS FOR THE TRANSONIC FULL POTENTIAL EQUATION

    Chuan Xiao-Cai;William D. Gropp;David E. Keyes;Robin G. Melvin

Frequent Co-Authors

William Gropp
William Gropp University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Marc G. Genton
Marc G. Genton King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Xiao-Chuan Cai
Xiao-Chuan Cai University of Colorado Boulder
Ying Sun
Ying Sun King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Barry Smith
Barry Smith Argonne National Laboratory
Mitchell D. Smooke
Mitchell D. Smooke Yale University
Jack Dongarra
Jack Dongarra University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Scott Klasky
Scott Klasky Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Omar Ghattas
Omar Ghattas The University of Texas at Austin
Hakan Bagci
Hakan Bagci King Abdullah University of Science and Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students exploring Mathematics in the USA, online degrees present flexible alternatives that align well with data-driven fields. Many look to pursue advanced business qualifications, such as the mba programs easy to get into, which can complement mathematical skills with leadership and strategic thinking.

If flexibility and accessibility are priorities, the easiest mba online options allow working professionals to enhance their credentials while balancing other commitments. These programs often emphasize practical applications valuable for math graduates.

For those interested in higher-level consultancy or academic leadership, pursuing a dba online programs offers an affordable route to doctoral expertise, integrating analytical research skills honed through mathematics.

The financial sector remains a strong pathway, with many mathematicians finding roles in finance and investment. The best online masters in finance provide cost-effective education to sharpen quantitative and economic competencies for competitive careers in this field.

Best Scientists Citing David E. Keyes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles