World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michael W. I. Schmidt

Michael W. I. Schmidt

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
66
Citations
25035
World Ranking
2033
National Ranking
57

Chemistry

D-Index
69
Citations
25941
World Ranking
6074
National Ranking
126

Michael W. I. Schmidt publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael W. I. Schmidt sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 235 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Michael W. I. Schmidt D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael W. I. Schmidt sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael W. I. Schmidt is affiliated with the University of Zurich in Switzerland and conducts research primarily in the fields of Environmental Science and Agricultural and Biological Sciences. Their scientific focus encompasses key subfields such as Ecology, Soil Science, Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, and Nature and Landscape Conservation.

The main topics of their research cover Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics, Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology, Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology, Climate Change and Permafrost, Fire Effects on Ecosystems, Coastal Wetland Ecosystem Dynamics, and Fish Ecology and Management Studies.

Recent research outputs include the following publications: "Microbial carbon use efficiency promotes global soil carbon storage" (2023, Nature), "Five years of whole-soil warming led to loss of subsoil carbon stocks and increased CO2 efflux" (2021, Science Advances), "A Critical Evaluation of the Relationship Between the Effective Cation Exchange Capacity and Soil Organic Carbon Content in Swiss Forest Soils" (2020, Frontiers in Forests and Global Change), "Warming promotes loss of subsoil carbon through accelerated degradation of plant-derived organic matter" (2021, Soil Biology and Biochemistry), and "Rapid loss of complex polymers and pyrogenic carbon in subsoils under whole-soil warming" (2023, Nature Geoscience).

Frequent co-authors in their research collaborations include Nicholas O. E. Ofiti, Guido L. B. Wiesenberg, Margaret Torn, Cyrill Zosso, and Serita D. Frey.

The scientist frequently publishes in venues such as OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information), Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), SSRN Electronic Journal, SOIL, and Nature.

Best Publications

  • Persistence of soil organic matter as an ecosystem property

    Michael W. I. Schmidt;Margaret S. Torn;Margaret S. Torn;Samuel Abiven;Thorsten Dittmar;Thorsten Dittmar

  • Black carbon in soils and sediments: Analysis, distribution, implications, and current challenges

    Michael W. I. Schmidt;Angela G. Noack

  • How relevant is recalcitrance for the stabilization of organic matter in soils

    Bernd Marschner;Sonja Brodowski;Alexander Dreves;Gerd Gleixner

  • Black (pyrogenic) carbon: a synthesis of current knowledge and uncertainties with special consideration of boreal regions

    C M Preston;Michael W I Schmidt

  • Comparison of quantification methods to measure fire-derived (black/elemental) carbon in soils and sediments using reference materials from soil, water, sediment and the atmosphere

    Karen Hammes;Michael W.I. Schmidt;Ronald J. Smernik;Lloyd A. Currie

  • Microbial carbon use efficiency promotes global soil carbon storage

    Unknown

  • Measured soil organic matter fractions can be related to pools in the RothC model

    M. Zimmermann;J. Leifeld;M. W. I. Schmidt;P. Smith

  • Dissolved carbon leaching from soil is a crucial component of the net ecosystem carbon balance

    Reimo Kindler;Reimo Kindler;Jan Siemens;Jan Siemens;Klaus Kaiser;David Christopher Walmsley

  • Charred organic carbon in German chernozemic soils

    M. W. I. Schmidt;J. O. Skjemstad;E. Gehrt;I. Kögel-Knabner

  • Comparative analysis of black carbon in soils

    Michael W. I. Schmidt;Jan O. Skjemstad;Claudia I. Czimczik;Bruno Glaser

  • Improvement of 13C and 15N CPMAS NMR spectra of bulk soils, particle size fractions and organic material by treatment with 10% hydrofluoric acid

    M. W. I. Schmidt;Heike Knicker;Heike Knicker;Patrick G. Hatcher;I. Kögel-Knabner

  • π Bond Strengths in the Second and Third Periods

    Michael W. Schmidt;Phi N. Truong;Mark S. Gordon

  • Microplasmas, an emerging field of low-temperature plasma science and technology

    R. Foest;M. Schmidt;K. Becker

  • Effects of charring on mass, organic carbon, and stable carbon isotope composition of wood

    Claudia I. Czimczik;Caroline M. Preston;Michael W.I. Schmidt;Roland A. Werner

  • Aromaticity and degree of aromatic condensation of char

    Daniel B. Wiedemeier;Samuel Abiven;William C. Hockaday;Marco Keiluweit

  • Main Group Effective Nuclear Charges for Spin-Orbit Calculations

    Shiro Koseki;Mark S. Gordon;Michael W. Schmidt;Nikita Matsunaga

  • Centennial black carbon turnover observed in a Russian steppe soil

    K. Hammes;M. S. Torn;A. G. Lapenas;M. W. I. Schmidt

  • Synthesis and characterisation of laboratory-charred grass straw (Oryza sativa) and chestnut wood (Castanea sativa) as reference materials for black carbon quantification

    Karen Hammes;Ronald J. Smernik;Jan O. Skjemstad;Andreas Herzog

  • Evaluation of an ultrasonic dispersion procedure to isolate primary organomineral complexes from soils

    M. W. I. Schmidt;C. Rumpel;I. Kögel-Knabner

  • Ab initio vibrational state calculations with a quartic force field: applications to H2CO, C2H4, CH3OH, CH3CCH, and C6H6.

    Kiyoshi Yagi;Kimihiko Hirao;Tetsuya Taketsugu;Michael W. Schmidt

  • Five years of whole-soil warming led to loss of subsoil carbon stocks and increased CO2 efflux.

    Jennifer L. Soong;Cristina Castanha;Caitlin E. Hicks Pries;Nicholas Ofiti

  • Carbon isotope geochemistry and nanomorphology of soil black carbon: Black chernozemic soils in central Europe originate from ancient biomass burning

    Michael W. I. Schmidt;Michael W. I. Schmidt;Michael W. I. Schmidt;Jan O. Skjemstad;Cornelia Jäger

Frequent Co-Authors

Samuel Abiven
Samuel Abiven University of Zurich
Margaret S. Torn
Margaret S. Torn Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Guido L. B. Wiesenberg
Guido L. B. Wiesenberg University of Zurich
Mark S. Gordon
Mark S. Gordon Iowa State University
Frank Hagedorn
Frank Hagedorn Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
Ingrid Kögel-Knabner
Ingrid Kögel-Knabner Technical University of Munich
Heike Knicker
Heike Knicker Spanish National Research Council
Jan O. Skjemstad
Jan O. Skjemstad Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Walter Schnelle
Walter Schnelle Max Planck Institute for Chemical Physics of Solids

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in expanding their expertise beyond Environmental Sciences, a variety of related online degrees offer flexible learning options. Programs like a sociology bachelor degree online provide valuable insights into human behavior and social systems, crucial for addressing environmental challenges through community engagement and policy development.

Educators and professionals seeking advancement may explore online edd programs no dissertation, which cater to those who want to pursue a Doctor of Education degree with a more streamlined research component. These programs enable leaders to integrate sustainability principles within educational frameworks effectively.

For those looking to elevate their academic credentials, eds to edd bridge programs online offer a seamless transition from a master’s to a doctoral degree. This pathway supports professionals aiming for leadership roles in environmental policy, education, or community advocacy.

Finally, for social workers focused on environmental justice and community health, dsw programs provide advanced training to influence social policies and implement impactful change in vulnerable populations.

Best Scientists Citing Michael W. I. Schmidt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles