World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
59
Citations
25974
World Ranking
3330
National Ranking
1617

Ewing Lusk publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ewing Lusk sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 235 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Ewing Lusk D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ewing Lusk sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ewing Lusk is affiliated with Argonne National Laboratory in the United States. The scientist's work is connected to this institution, which is known for research in various scientific and technological fields.

No recent papers, frequent co-authors, or specific publication venues are listed for Ewing Lusk. Similarly, there is no record of book publications or awards associated with this scientist in the available data.

Details about main fields of study, subfields, and the primary topics of research are not provided, so no additional information on the specific focus areas is available at this time.

The absence of publicly listed recent publications and research collaborations suggests that either the scientist's work is in earlier stages of dissemination or data sources have yet to capture the extent of their contributions.

The profile is based strictly on the verified institutional affiliation and confirmed current status as living.

Best Publications

  • Using MPI: Portable Parallel Programming with the Message-Passing Interface

    William Gropp;Ewing Lusk;Anthony Skjellum

  • A high-performance, portable implementation of the MPI message passing interface standard

    William Gropp;Ewing Lusk;Nathan Doss;Anthony Skjellum

  • Skjellum using mpi: portable parallel programming with the message-passing interface

    William D. Gropp;Ewing L. Lusk

  • Using MPI-2: Advanced Features of the Message Passing Interface

    William Gropp;Ewing Lusk;Rajeev Thakur

  • Data sieving and collective I/O in ROMIO

    R. Thakur;W. Gropp;W. Gropp;E. Lusk

  • Automated reasoning: Introduction and applications

    Larry Wos;Ross Overbeck;Ewing Lusk;Jim Boyle

  • On implementing MPI-IO portably and with high performance

    Rajeev Thakur;William Gropp;Ewing Lusk

  • Portable Programs for Parallel Processors

    Ewing Lusk;James Boyle;Ralph Butler;Terrence Disz

  • Beowulf Cluster Computing with Linux

    Thomas Sterling;Ewing Lusk;William Gropp

  • The Aurora or-parallel Prolog system

    E. Lusk;R. Butler;T. Disz;R. Olson

  • Users guide for mpich, a portable implementation of MPI

    Unknown

  • Monitors, messages, and clusters: the p4 parallel programming system

    Ralph M. Butler;Ewing L. Lusk

  • MPI - The Complete Reference: Volume 2, The MPI Extensions

    William Gropp;Steven Huss-Lederman;Andrew Lumsdaine;Ewing Lusk

  • Toward Scalable Performance Visualization with Jumpshot

    Omer Zaki;Ewing Lusk;William Gropp;Deborah Swider

  • Reproducible Measurements of MPI Performance Characteristics

    William Gropp;Ewing L. Lusk

  • Fault Tolerance in Message Passing Interface Programs

    William Gropp;Ewing Lusk

  • An abstract-device interface for implementing portable parallel-I/O interfaces

    R. Thakur;W. Gropp;E. Lusk

  • MPI-2: Extending the Message-Passing Interface

    Al Geist;William Gropp;Steven Huss-Lederman;Andrew Lumsdaine

  • Users guide for ROMIO: A high-performance, portable MPI-IO implementation

    R. Thakur;E. Lusk;W. Gropp

  • Exploiting hierarchy in parallel computer networks to optimize collective operation performance

    Nicholas T. Karonis;Bronis R. de Supinski;Ian Foster;William D Gropp;William D Gropp

  • Portable implementation of the mpi message passing interface standard

    William D. Gropp;Ewing L. Lusk;Nathan E. Doss;A. Skjeltum. A Highperformance

Frequent Co-Authors

William Gropp
William Gropp University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Rajeev Thakur
Rajeev Thakur Argonne National Laboratory
Anthony Skjellum
Anthony Skjellum University of Tennessee at Chattanooga
Ross Overbeek
Ross Overbeek Argonne National Laboratory
Ian Foster
Ian Foster University of Chicago
Pavan Balaji
Pavan Balaji Argonne National Laboratory
Rick Stevens
Rick Stevens Argonne National Laboratory
Daniel S. Katz
Daniel S. Katz University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Michael Wilde
Michael Wilde Argonne National Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to many related online degrees and career options. For those seeking flexible learning and affordability, there are many programs available that cater to a range of industries and interests.

Students aiming to start their higher education journey can look into the cheapest bachelor degree online programs for quality education at a lower cost. Those specifically interested in the intersection of technology and engineering may consider highly-rated online engineering degree programs to gain specialized skills in areas such as software and systems engineering.

For professionals seeking to advance into leadership, pursuing the cheapest executive mba online allows for management education while balancing career commitments. Additionally, individuals interested in information organization and digital archives may find value in a mlis degree, opening careers in libraries, technology consulting, and research.

Each of these pathways can be pursued online, giving students flexibility, cost savings, and access to a wide range of technology-driven careers.

Best Scientists Citing Ewing Lusk

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles