World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
40
Citations
6201
World Ranking
7348
National Ranking
2010

Ali Pinar publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ali Pinar sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 243 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Ali Pinar D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ali Pinar sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2015 - ACM Distinguished Member
  • 2011 - ACM Senior Member

Overview

Ali Pinar is affiliated with Sandia National Laboratories in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines within earth sciences and computer science, focusing primarily on seismic activity and related geophysical phenomena as well as computational methods applied to these fields.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Earth and Planetary Sciences
  • Computer Science

The primary subfields of study are:

  • Geophysics
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Civil and Structural Engineering

Key research topics covered in their publications include:

  • Earthquake and tectonic studies
  • Earthquake Detection and Analysis
  • High-pressure geophysics and materials
  • Seismology and Earthquake Studies
  • Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Caching and Content Delivery
  • Software-Defined Networks and 5G

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Ali Pinar demonstrate a strong focus on earthquake phenomena and seismotectonic analysis. Selected publications include:

  • "A preliminary report on the February 6, 2023 earthquakes in Türkiye," 2023, published in Temblor
  • "Characteristics of the 2020 Samos earthquake (Aegean Sea) using seismic data," 2021, published in Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
  • "Source characteristics and seismotectonic implications of the 26 September 2019 Mw 5.7 Silivri High-Kumburgaz Basin earthquake and evaluation of its aftershocks at the North Anatolian Fault Zone (Central Marmara Sea, NW Turkey)," 2021, published in Geophysical Journal International
  • "Fault geometry beneath the western and Central Marmara Sea, Turkey, based on ocean bottom seismographic observations: Implications for future large earthquakes," 2020, published in Tectonophysics
  • "An integrated critical approach to off-fault strike-slip motion triggered by the 2011 Van mainshock (Mw 7.1), Eastern Anatolia (Turkey): New stress field constraints on subcrustal deformation," 2021, published in Journal of Geodynamics

Ali Pinar has published frequently with several coauthors, evidencing collaborative work in their field. Frequent collaborators include:

  • Erhan Altunel
  • Zeynep Coşkun
  • Mustafa Erdik
  • Yojiro Yamamoto
  • Doǧan Kalafat

Their contributions appear repeatedly in prominent venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Temblor
  • Geophysical Journal International
  • Tectonophysics
  • TURKISH JOURNAL OF EARTH SCIENCES

In addition to their scientific publications, Ali Pinar has received professional recognition within the computing community. They were named an ACM Distinguished Member in 2015 and an ACM Senior Member in 2011.

Best Publications

  • Community structure and scale-free collections of Erdős-Rényi graphs.

    C. Seshadhri;Tamara G. Kolda;Ali Pinar

  • Improving Performance of Sparse Matrix-Vector Multiplication

    Ali Pinar;Michael T. Heath

  • VS30 mapping and soil classification for seismic site effect evaluation in Dinar region, SW Turkey

    Ali Ismet Kanlı;Péter Tildy;Zsolt Prónay;Ali Pınar

  • On Identifying Strongly Connected Components in Parallel

    Lisa Fleischer;Bruce Hendrickson;Ali Pinar

  • A Scalable Generative Graph Model with Community Structure

    Tamara G. Kolda;Ali Pinar;Todd D. Plantenga;C. Seshadhri

  • A Simulator for Large-Scale Parallel Computer Architectures

    Helgi Adalsteinsson;Scott Cranford;David A. Evensky;Joseph P. Kenny

  • Permuting Sparse Rectangular Matrices into Block-Diagonal Form

    Cevdet Aykanat;Ali Pinar;Ümit V. Çatalyürek

  • Optimization Strategies for the Vulnerability Analysis of the Electric Power Grid

    Ali Pinar;Juan Meza;Vaibhav Donde;Bernard Lesieutre

  • ESCAPE: Efficiently Counting All 5-Vertex Subgraphs

    Ali Pinar;C. Seshadhri;Vaidyanathan Vishal

  • Severe Multiple Contingency Screening in Electric Power Systems

    V. Donde;V. Lopez;B. Lesieutre;A. Pinar

  • A space efficient streaming algorithm for triangle counting using the birthday paradox

    Madhav Jha;C. Seshadhri;Ali Pinar

  • Path Sampling: A Fast and Provable Method for Estimating 4-Vertex Subgraph Counts

    Madhav Jha;C. Seshadhri;Ali Pinar

  • Finding the Hierarchy of Dense Subgraphs using Nucleus Decompositions

    Ahmet Erdem Sariyuce;C. Seshadhri;Ali Pinar;Umit V. Catalyurek

  • Triadic Measures on Graphs: The Power of Wedge Sampling

    C. Seshadhri;Ali Pinar;Tamara G. Kolda

  • Fast optimal load balancing algorithms for 1D partitioning

    Ali Pinar;Cevdet Aykanat

  • Measuring and modeling bipartite graphs with community structure

    Sinan G. Aksoy;Tamara G. Kolda;Ali Pinar

  • Peeling Bipartite Networks for Dense Subgraph Discovery

    Ahmet Erdem Sarıyüce;Ali Pinar

  • Moment tensor inversion of recent small to moderate sized earthquakes: implications for seismic hazard and active tectonics beneath the Sea of Marmara

    Ali Pinar;Keiko Kuge;Yoshimori Honkura

  • Counting Triangles in Massive Graphs with MapReduce

    Tamara G. Kolda;Ali Pinar;Todd D. Plantenga;C. Seshadhri

  • Local algorithms for hierarchical dense subgraph discovery

    Ahmet Erdem Sariyüce;C. Seshadhri;Ali Pinar

  • Identification of severe multiple contingencies in electric power networks

    V. Donde;V. Lopez;B. Lesieutre;A. Pinar

  • Communication Requirements and Interconnect Optimization for High-End Scientific Applications

    S. Kamil;L. Oliker;A. Pinar;J. Shalf

  • Constructing and sampling graphs with a prescribed joint degree distribution

    Isabelle Stanton;Ali Pinar

Frequent Co-Authors

Tamara G. Kolda
Tamara G. Kolda Independent Scientist / Consultant, US
C. Seshadhri
C. Seshadhri University of California, Santa Cruz
Narumi Takahashi
Narumi Takahashi Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology
Yoshiyuki Kaneda
Yoshiyuki Kaneda Nagoya University
Bernard C. Lesieutre
Bernard C. Lesieutre University of Wisconsin–Madison
Bruce Hendrickson
Bruce Hendrickson Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Ümit V. Çatalyürek
Ümit V. Çatalyürek Georgia Institute of Technology
Jean-Paul Watson
Jean-Paul Watson Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Yoshimori Honkura
Yoshimori Honkura Tokyo Institute of Technology
Tina Eliassi-Rad
Tina Eliassi-Rad Northeastern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Ali Pinar

Trending Scientists