World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
69
Citations
44173
World Ranking
1913
National Ranking
969

Armando Fox publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Armando Fox sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 212 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Armando Fox D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Armando Fox sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Armando Fox is affiliated with the University of California, Berkeley in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Computer Science, with a focus on several subfields and interdisciplinary areas.

The main subfields Armando Fox works in include:

  • Information Systems
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Information Systems and Management
  • Gender Studies
  • Economics and Econometrics

Their work covers a variety of topics such as:

  • Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Open Source Software Innovations
  • Teaching and Learning Programming
  • Gender and Technology in Education
  • Software Engineering Research
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Personal Information Management and User Behavior

Armando Fox has published several papers, mainly in venues related to software engineering and computer science:

  • "Exploring Gender Bias In Remote Pair Programming Among Software Engineering Students: The twincode Original Study And First External Replication" (2024, Empirical Software Engineering)
  • "Gender Bias in Remote Pair Programming among Software Engineering Students: The twincode Exploratory Study" (2021, arXiv (Cornell University))
  • "Exploring Gender Bias in Remote Pair Programming among Software Engineering Students: The twincode Original Study and First External Replication" (2023, arXiv (Cornell University))
  • "PCR170 Comparing Algorithms for Mapping from EQ-5D-3L to EQ-5D-5L in Two Patient Cohorts" (2023, Value in Health)
  • "OmniFill: Domain-Agnostic Form Filling Suggestions Using Multi-Faceted Context" (2023, arXiv (Cornell University))

Their frequent publication venues include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Empirical Software Engineering
  • Value in Health

Armando Fox collaborates often with a consistent group of co-authors, including:

  • Amador Durán
  • Nathaniel Weinman
  • Beatriz Bernárdez
  • Aslıhan Akalın
  • Pablo Fernández

This profile shows that Armando Fox's research interests are strongly oriented toward software engineering topics with intersecting concerns on gender and education, as well as applications touching on health systems and user behavior in technology. Their contributions appear in respected specialized forums for software engineering and applied computer science research.

Best Publications

  • A view of cloud computing

    Michael Armbrust;Armando Fox;Rean Griffith;Anthony D. Joseph

  • Above the Clouds: A Berkeley View of Cloud Computing

    Michael Armbrust;Armando Fox;Rean Griffith;Anthony D. Joseph

  • Detecting Large-Scale System Problems by Mining Console Logs

    Wei Xu;Ling Huang;Armando Fox;David A. Patterson

  • The Interactive Workspaces project: experiences with ubiquitous computing rooms

    B. Johanson;A. Fox;T. Winograd

  • Pinpoint: problem determination in large, dynamic Internet services

    M.Y. Chen;E. Kiciman;E. Fratkin;A. Fox

  • Cluster-based scalable network services

    Armando Fox;Steven D. Gribble;Yatin Chawathe;Eric A. Brewer

  • Adapting to network and client variability via on-demand dynamic distillation

    Armando Fox;Steven D. Gribble;Eric A. Brewer;Elan Amir

  • Recovery Oriented Computing (ROC): Motivation, Definition, Techniques, and Case Studies

    David Patterson;Aaron Brown;Pete Broadwell;George Candea

  • System software for ubiquitous computing

    T. Kindberg;A. Fox

  • Microreboot — A technique for cheap recovery

    George Candea;Shinichi Kawamoto;Yuichi Fujiki;Greg Friedman

  • Adapting to network and client variation using infrastructural proxies: lessons and perspectives

    A. Fox;S.D. Gribble;Y. Chawathe;E.A. Brewer

  • From MOOCs to SPOCs

    Armando Fox

  • Path-based faliure and evolution management

    Mike Y. Chen;Anthony Accardi;Emre Kiciman;Jim Lloyd

  • ICrafter: A Service Framework for Ubiquitous Computing Environments

    Shankar Ponnekanti;Brian Lee;Armando Fox;Pat Hanrahan

  • Predicting Multiple Metrics for Queries: Better Decisions Enabled by Machine Learning

    Archana Ganapathi;Harumi Kuno;Umeshwar Dayal;Janet L. Wiener

  • Capturing, indexing, clustering, and retrieving system history

    Ira Cohen;Steve Zhang;Moises Goldszmidt;Julie Symons

  • Integrating information appliances into an interactive workspace

    A. Fox;B. Johanson;P. Hanrahan;T. Winograd

  • Reducing WWW latency and bandwidth requirements by real-time distillation

    Armando Fox;Eric A. Brewer

  • Fingerprinting the datacenter: automated classification of performance crises

    Peter Bodik;Moises Goldszmidt;Armando Fox;Dawn B. Woodard

  • A network architecture for heterogeneous mobile computing

    E.A. Brewer;R.H. Katz;Y. Chawathe;S.D. Gribble

  • Statistics-driven workload modeling for the Cloud

    Archana Ganapathi;Yanpei Chen;Armando Fox;Randy Katz

Frequent Co-Authors

David A. Patterson
David A. Patterson University of California, Berkeley
George Candea
George Candea École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Eric Brewer
Eric Brewer University of California, Berkeley
Michael I. Jordan
Michael I. Jordan University of California, Berkeley
Emre Kiciman
Emre Kiciman Microsoft (United States)
Shoaib Kamil
Shoaib Kamil Adobe Systems (United States)
Randy H. Katz
Randy H. Katz University of California, Berkeley
Steven D. Gribble
Steven D. Gribble Google (United States)
Michael J. Franklin
Michael J. Franklin University of Chicago
Marti A. Hearst
Marti A. Hearst University of California, Berkeley

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees can open up a wide range of career pathways beyond just traditional computer science roles. With the rise of remote learning, students now have more flexible options to fit their educational goals and personal schedules.

For those interested in a quick route to the workforce, consider enrolling in a fast track computer science degree program. These accelerated options allow students to earn their degrees faster and start building valuable experience sooner.

Engineering fields are another popular path for computer science enthusiasts. You might find inspiration in the cheapest online mechanical engineering degree programs, or explore sustainability by pursuing an environmental engineer degree online.

Curious how a science or engineering background expands your opportunities? Discover what can you do with an environmental science degree for a broader view of job options and interdisciplinary roles.

Best Scientists Citing Armando Fox

Trending Scientists