World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
81
Citations
26604
World Ranking
1021
National Ranking
544

Roy H. Campbell publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roy H. Campbell sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 497 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Roy H. Campbell D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roy H. Campbell sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2005 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to concurrent programming, system software, security, and ubiquitous computing.
  • 1934 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Roy H. Campbell is affiliated with the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in the United States. Their research spans several fields, with a significant focus on Medicine, Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Computer Science. The subfields of their work include Molecular Biology, Artificial Intelligence, Infectious Diseases, Neurology, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging.

The primary topics covered in their publications include:

  • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Gene expression and cancer classification
  • COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
  • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Voice and Speech Disorders
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder Research

Roy H. Campbell has published research in various venues. The most frequent include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • npj Parkinson s Disease
  • Practice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing

Among recent papers, some notable works are:

  • Identification and prediction of Parkinson's disease subtypes and progression using machine learning in two cohorts, 2022, npj Parkinson s Disease
  • HAL: Computer System for Scalable Deep Learning, 2020, Practice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing
  • Application of Aligned-UMAP to longitudinal biomedical studies, 2023, Patterns
  • Going by the numbers: Learning and modeling COVID-19 disease dynamics, 2020, Chaos Solitons & Fractals
  • Multi-Modality Machine Learning Predicting Parkinson's Disease, 2021, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Anant Dadu
  • Faraz Faghri
  • Hirotaka Iwaki
  • Andrew Singleton
  • Mike A. Nalls

Roy H. Campbell has been recognized with awards such as the IEEE Fellow status in 2005 for contributions to concurrent programming, system software, security, and ubiquitous computing. Additionally, they are a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS).

Best Publications

  • A middleware infrastructure for active spaces

    M. Roman;C. Hess;R. Cerqueira;A. Ranganathan

  • Big data: Astronomical or genomical?

    Zachary D. Stephens;Skylar Y. Lee;Faraz Faghri;Roy H. Campbell

  • The specification of process synchronization by path expressions

    Roy H. Campbell;A. Nico Habermann

  • A middleware for context-aware agents in ubiquitous computing environments

    Anand Ranganathan;Roy H. Campbell

  • ARIA: automatic resource inference and allocation for mapreduce environments

    Abhishek Verma;Ludmila Cherkasova;Roy H. Campbell

  • Model-Based Reinforcement Learning for Atari

    Lukasz Kaiser;Mohammad Babaeizadeh;Piotr Milos;Blazej Osinski

  • The case for reflective middleware

    Fabio Kon;Fabio Costa;Gordon Blair;Roy H. Campbell

  • Monitoring, security, and dynamic configuration with the dynamicTAO reflective ORB

    Fabio Kon;Manuel Román;Ping Liu;Jina Mao

  • An infrastructure for context-awareness based on first order logic

    Anand Ranganathan;Roy H. Campbell

  • Consistent and durable data structures for non-volatile byte-addressable memory

    Shivaram Venkataraman;Niraj Tolia;Parthasarathy Ranganathan;Roy H. Campbell

  • Reasoning about uncertain contexts in pervasive computing environments

    A. Ranganathan;J. Al-Muhtadi;R.H. Campbell

  • Towards security and privacy for pervasive computing

    Roy Campbell;Jalal Al-Muhtadi;Prasad Naldurg;Geetanjali Sampemane

  • Stochastic Variational Video Prediction

    Mohammad Babaeizadeh;Chelsea Finn;Dumitru Erhan;Roy H. Campbell

  • A fault-tolerant scheduling problem

    A. L. Liestman;R. H. Campbell

  • Model Based Reinforcement Learning for Atari

    Łukasz Kaiser;Mohammad Babaeizadeh;Piotr Miłos;Błażej Osiński

  • Samza: stateful scalable stream processing at LinkedIn

    Shadi A. Noghabi;Kartik Paramasivam;Yi Pan;Navina Ramesh

  • Real-Time Video and Audio in the World Wide Web.

    Zhigang Chen;See-Mong Tan;Roy H. Campbell;Yongcheng Li

  • Method and system for transmitting and/or retrieving real-time video and audio information over performance-limited transmission systems

    Roy Campbell;See-Mong Tan;Dong Xie;Zhigang Chen

  • Error recovery in asynchronous systems

    R. H. Campbell;B. Randell

  • Monitoring, security, and dynamic configuration with the dynamic TAO reflective ORB

    Fabio Kon;Manuel Román;Ping Liu;Jina Mao

Frequent Co-Authors

Anand Ranganathan
Anand Ranganathan Unscrambl Inc.
Fabio Kon
Fabio Kon Universidade de São Paulo
Jalal Al-Muhtadi
Jalal Al-Muhtadi King Saud University
Klara Nahrstedt
Klara Nahrstedt University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Indranil Gupta
Indranil Gupta Dalhousie University
Apu Kapadia
Apu Kapadia Indiana University
Shivaram Venkataraman
Shivaram Venkataraman University of Wisconsin–Madison
Yi Lu
Yi Lu University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Mike A. Nalls
Mike A. Nalls National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens the door to a variety of related online degrees and streamlined career opportunities. Students interested in a wider scientific foundation might consider an online bachelor's degree in physics, which offers flexibility and solid foundations for tech and research roles.

With data becoming essential across industries, following a data science learning path can provide in-demand skills in analytics, machine learning, and AI. Alternatively, tech enthusiasts seeking hands-on experience may explore electrical engineering degree online admissions, supporting careers in robotics, hardware, and more.

For those who want quicker entry into the workforce or upskill rapidly, certificate programs that pay well offer flexible and cost-effective training. Each of these options represents a modern, accessible approach to building a rewarding tech career while balancing personal and professional commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Roy H. Campbell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles