What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
His primary scientific interests are in Genetics, Gene, Genome, Mutation and Cancer research.
His Genome study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as International Knockout Mouse Consortium, Computational biology and Laboratory mouse.
His studies deal with areas such as Cancer and Molecular biology as well as Mutation.
His Cancer study incorporates themes from Insertional mutagenesis, Germline and DNA methylation.
His work on Melanoma as part of general Cancer research study is frequently linked to Competing endogenous RNA, bridging the gap between disciplines.
David J. Adams usually deals with Endocrinology and limits it to topics linked to Ion channel and Cell biology.
His most cited work include:
- Pancreatic cancer genomes reveal aberrations in axon guidance pathway genes (1304 citations)
- Mouse genomic variation and its effect on phenotypes and gene regulation (1135 citations)
- Recommendations for Noninvasive Evaluation of Native Valvular Regurgitation: A Report from the American Society of Echocardiography Developed in Collaboration with the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (968 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His scientific interests lie mostly in Genetics, Pharmacology, Gene, Cancer research and Internal medicine.
His is involved in several facets of Genetics study, as is seen by his studies on Genome, Mutation, Cancer, Insertional mutagenesis and Phenotype.
The various areas that he examines in his Pharmacology study include Conotoxin, Voltage-dependent calcium channel, Nicotinic agonist, GABAB receptor and Acetylcholine receptor.
His work investigates the relationship between Conotoxin and topics such as Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor that intersect with problems in Stereochemistry.
His research in Cancer research is mostly concerned with Melanoma.
In his study, Biophysics is strongly linked to Endocrinology, which falls under the umbrella field of Internal medicine.
He most often published in these fields:
- Genetics (18.57%)
- Pharmacology (13.83%)
- Gene (12.01%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2018-2021)?
- Cancer research (11.53%)
- Gene (12.01%)
- Melanoma (6.80%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Cancer research, Gene, Melanoma, Computational biology and Pharmacology are his primary areas of study.
His Cancer research research incorporates themes from Carcinogenesis, Mutation, Immune system, Antigen and Germline.
His Gene research includes themes of Function and Cell biology.
His Computational biology research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Genome, Genomics and Mutation rate.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Acetylcholine receptor, α conotoxin, Nicotinic agonist and Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor.
His study with Mutant involves better knowledge in Genetics.
Between 2018 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Pan-cancer analysis of whole genomes (538 citations)
- An atlas of genetic influences on osteoporosis in humans and mice (211 citations)
- Epithelial NOTCH Signaling Rewires the Tumor Microenvironment of Colorectal Cancer to Drive Poor-Prognosis Subtypes and Metastasis. (76 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
His primary areas of investigation include Cancer research, Computational biology, Gene, Genome and Melanoma.
The concepts of his Cancer research study are interwoven with issues in Wnt signaling pathway, Mutation, Carcinogenesis, Germline and Metastasis.
David J. Adams combines subjects such as Cancer, Genome editing, CRISPR, Point mutation and Genomics with his study of Computational biology.
His Gene research integrates issues from Interleukin 4 and Cell biology.
His research integrates issues of In silico, Model organism, DNA sequencing and Human genetics in his study of Genome.
His Germline mutation research is classified as research in Genetics.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
