World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
46
Citations
9754
World Ranking
6381
National Ranking
644

Adam Rutland publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adam Rutland sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 156 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Adam Rutland D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adam Rutland sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Adam Rutland is affiliated with the University of Exeter in the United Kingdom and has focused their research primarily in the social sciences and psychology fields. Their work substantially covers subfields such as sociology and political science, social psychology, safety research, experimental and cognitive psychology, and management, monitoring, policy, and law.

The scientist's notable research themes include social and intergroup psychology, career development and diversity, education, achievement, and giftedness, youth development and social support, environmental education and sustainability, bullying, victimization, and aggression, as well as misinformation and its impacts.

Rutland has published extensively in several academic journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of Youth and Adolescence
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • PLoS ONE
  • Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology
  • Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

Examples of recent papers authored or coauthored by Rutland are:

  • STEM gender stereotypes from early childhood through adolescence at informal science centers, 2020, Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology
  • The Relations and Role of Social Competencies and Belonging with Math and Science Interest and Efficacy for Adolescents in Informal STEM Programs, 2020, Journal of Youth and Adolescence
  • Promoting Fair and Just School Environments: Developing Inclusive Youth, 2022, Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • Children's Gender Stereotypes in STEM Following a One-Shot Growth Mindset Intervention in a Science Museum, 2021, Frontiers in Psychology
  • Minority- and majority-status bystander reactions to, and reasoning about, intergroup social exclusion, 2021, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

The scientist has collaborated frequently with colleagues such as Luke McGuire, Mark Winterbottom, Kelly Lynn Mulvey, Adam Hartstone-Rose, and Fidelia Law. These coauthorship relationships have resulted in numerous joint publications.

Best Publications

  • Social Norms and Self‐Presentation: Children's Implicit and Explicit Intergroup Attitudes

    Adam Rutland;Lindsey Cameron;Alan B. Milne;Peter McGeorge

  • Changing Children's Intergroup Attitudes Toward Refugees: Testing Different Models of Extended Contact

    Lindsey Cameron;Adam Rutland;Rupert Brown;Rebecca Douch

  • Extended contact through story reading in school : Reducing children's prejudice toward the disabled

    Lindsey Cameron;Adam Rutland

  • A New Social-Cognitive Developmental Perspective on Prejudice The Interplay Between Morality and Group Identity

    Adam Rutland;Melanie Killen;Dominic Abrams

  • Children and Social Exclusion: Morality, Prejudice, and Group Identity

    Melanie Killen;Adam Rutland

  • Direct and extended friendship effects on minority and majority children's interethnic attitudes: a longitudinal study.

    Allard R. Feddes;Peter Noack;Adam Rutland

  • A Developmental Science Approach to Reducing Prejudice and Social Exclusion: Intergroup Processes, Social‐Cognitive Development, and Moral Reasoning

    Adam Rutland;Melanie Killen

  • The Development of Subjective Group Dynamics: Children's Judgments of Normative and Deviant In‐Group and Out‐Group Individuals

    Dominic Abrams;Adam Rutland;Lindsey Cameron

  • The development of subjective group dynamics

    Dominic Abrams;Adam Rutland

  • Footedness in world soccer: an analysis of France '98

    David P. Carey;Geoff Smith;Daniel T. Smith;John W. Shepherd

  • Promoting children's positive intergroup attitudes towards stigmatized groups: Extended contact and multiple classification skills training

    Lindsey Cameron;Adam Rutland;Rupert Brown

  • Interracial contact and racial constancy: A multi-site study of racial intergroup bias in 3-5 year old Anglo-British children

    Adam Rutland;Lindsey Cameron;Laura Bennett;Jennifer M. Ferrell

  • Children’s Group Nous: Understanding and Applying Peer Exclusion Within and Between Groups

    Dominic Abrams;Adam Rutland;Joseph Pelletier;Jennifer M Ferrell

  • Development of Intra- and Intergroup Judgments in the Context of Moral and Social-Conventional Norms

    Melanie Killen;Adam Rutland;Dominic Abrams;Kelly Lynn Mulvey

  • The development of national prejudice, in-group favouritism and self-stereotypes in British children

    Adam Rutland

  • The development of subjective group dynamics: When in-group bias gets specific

    Dominic Abrams;Adam Rutland;Lindsey Cameron;Jose M. Marques

  • When and why does extended contact work?: The role of high quality direct contact and group norms in the development of positive ethnic intergroup attitudes amongst children

    Lindsey Cameron;Adam Rutland;Rosa Hossain;Rebecca Petley

  • Children’s Judgments of Disloyal and Immoral Peer Behavior: Subjective Group Dynamics in Minimal Intergroup Contexts

    Dominic Abrams;Adam Rutland;Jennifer M. Ferrell;Joseph Pelletier

  • Older but wilier: In-group accountability and the development of subjective group dynamics.

    Dominic Abrams;Adam Rutland;Lindsey Cameron;Jennifer M. Ferrell

  • Friendship Preferences Among German and Turkish Preadolescents

    Philipp Jugert;Peter Noack;Adam Rutland

Frequent Co-Authors

Melanie Killen
Melanie Killen University of Maryland, College Park
Dominic Abrams
Dominic Abrams University of Kent
Rupert Brown
Rupert Brown University of Sussex
Peter Smith
Peter Smith University of Aberdeen
Peter Noack
Peter Noack Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Drew Nesdale
Drew Nesdale Griffith University
Frances R. Balkwill
Frances R. Balkwill Queen Mary University of London
Christia Spears Brown
Christia Spears Brown University of Kentucky
Sheri R. Levy
Sheri R. Levy Stony Brook University
Alan B. Milne
Alan B. Milne University of Aberdeen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens doors to a rich variety of career pathways, including social work, counseling, and mental health services. Many psychology graduates go on to pursue social work, which requires fulfilling specific state-based educational requirements.

For example, the Missouri education requirements for social workers emphasize the need for at least a Bachelor’s or Master’s in Social Work to gain licensure. Meanwhile, the social worker degree requirements in Montana highlight similar academic pathways while detailing additional training or supervised experience.

Aspiring social workers in Nebraska must also meet specific educational benchmarks, as described in the social worker education requirements in Nebraska. In Nevada, earning licensure requires meeting the Nevada minimum degree requirement for social workers, which typically includes completion of an approved degree in social work and state examinations.

By understanding these requirements, psychology students can better plan their academic journey and professional goals, ensuring they select the right online degree program for their chosen career pathway.

Best Scientists Citing Adam Rutland

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles