World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Psychology
UK
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 110 392 344 60 53 492 50807

Miles Hewstone publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Miles Hewstone between 1978 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Miles Hewstone published across 48 years, from 1978 to 2025, averaging 11 papers a year. Output peaked at 31 publications in 2017. 9 of the 527 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 31. Peak 31 publications in 2017. 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 5 publications 1982: 9 publications 1983: 5 publications 1984: 6 publications 1985: 6 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 10 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 14 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 17 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 15 publications 2007: 20 publications 2008: 29 publications 2009: 18 publications 2010: 25 publications 2011: 25 publications 2012: 27 publications 2013: 26 publications 2014: 25 publications 2015: 18 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 31 publications 2018: 21 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 22 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 1 publication
1978 2025

527 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Miles Hewstone: publications per year, 1978 to 2025
Year Publications
1978 1
1979 0
1980 0
1981 5
1982 9
1983 5
1984 6
1985 6
1986 5
1987 2
1988 10
1989 4
1990 5
1991 4
1992 7
1993 5
1994 5
1995 0
1996 5
1997 4
1998 2
1999 5
2000 6
2001 14
2002 10
2003 10
2004 17
2005 11
2006 15
2007 20
2008 29
2009 18
2010 25
2011 25
2012 27
2013 26
2014 25
2015 18
2016 17
2017 31
2018 21
2019 11
2020 11
2021 22
2022 7
2023 7
2024 8
2025 1
Total 527
Download as CSV

Miles Hewstone publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Miles Hewstone sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 491–500 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 492 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20 492
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Miles Hewstone D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Miles Hewstone sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 110–111 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 110 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35 110
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • 1987 - Spearman Medal, British Psychological Society

Overview

Miles Hewstone is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. Their research mainly focuses on social sciences and psychology, with a notable emphasis on social and intergroup psychology. The subfields of study that characterize their work include sociology and political science, social psychology, cognitive neuroscience, gender studies, and experimental and cognitive psychology.

The topics covered by Hewstone's research are diverse, encompassing social and intergroup psychology, cultural differences and values, psychology of moral and emotional judgment, racial and ethnic identity research, social capital and networks, gender diversity and inequality, and evolutionary psychology and human behavior.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Hewstone include:

  • "Intergroup contact is reliably associated with reduced prejudice, even in the face of group threat and discrimination." (2023), published in American Psychologist
  • "Online Engagement Between Opposing Political Protest Groups via Social Media is Linked to Physical Violence of Offline Encounters" (2021), published in Social Media + Society
  • "COVID-19 threat and perceptions of common belonging with outgroups: The roles of prejudice-related individual differences and intergroup contact" (2021), published in Personality and Individual Differences
  • "Close to me: The importance of closeness versus superficiality in explaining the positive-negative contact asymmetry" (2020), published in European Journal of Social Psychology
  • "Disentangling contact and socialization effects on outgroup attitudes in diverse friendship networks." (2021), published in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Hewstone frequently publishes in several venues, including:

  • Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
  • Social Psychological and Personality Science
  • Journal of Applied Social Psychology
  • European Journal of Social Psychology
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Their work involves collaboration with several co-authors, notably:

  • Katharina Schmid
  • Ralf Wölfer
  • Oliver Christ
  • Miguel R. Ramos
  • Francesca Prati

Among professional recognitions, Hewstone was awarded the Spearman Medal by the British Psychological Society in 1987.

Best Publications

  • An integrative theory of intergroup contact

    Rupert Brown;Miles Hewstone

  • Intergroup Bias

    Unknown

  • Contact is not enough: An intergroup perspective on the 'contact hypothesis.'

    Miles Hewstone;Rupert Brown

  • Dimensions of Contact as Predictors of Intergroup Anxiety, Perceived Out-Group Variability, and Out-Group Attitude: An Integrative Model

    Mir Rabiul Islam;Miles Hewstone

  • Social Identity Theory's Self-Esteem Hypothesis: A Review and Some Suggestions for Clarification

    Mark Rubin;Miles Hewstone

  • Causal Attribution: From Cognitive Processes to Collective Beliefs

    Miles Hewstone

  • The ‘ultimate attribution error’? A review of the literature on intergroup causal attribution

    Miles Hewstone

  • Intergroup Contact and Prejudice Toward Immigrants in Italy: The Mediational Role of Anxiety and the Moderational Role of Group Salience:

    Alberto Voci;Miles Hewstone

  • Reducing explicit and implicit outgroup prejudice via direct and extended contact: The mediating role of self-disclosure and intergroup anxiety.

    Rhiannon N. Turner;Miles Hewstone;Alberto Voci

  • I NTERGROUP B IAS

    Miles Hewstone;Mark Rubin;Hazel Willis

  • Contact and Conflict in Intergroup Encounters

    Miles Hewstone;Rupert Brown

  • Effects of Direct and Indirect Cross-Group Friendships on Judgments of Catholics and Protestants in Northern Ireland: The Mediating Role of an Anxiety-Reduction Mechanism

    Stefania Paolini;Miles Hewstone;Ed Cairns;Alberto Voci

  • Prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination: Theoretical and empirical overview

    J F Dovidio;M Hewstone;P Glick;V M Esses

  • Introduction to Social Psychology : A European Perspective

    Miles Hewstone;Wolfgang Stroebe;Goeffrey M. Stephenson

  • Introduction to Social Psychology

    M. Hewstone;W Stroebe

  • A test of the extended intergroup contact hypothesis: the mediating role of intergroup anxiety, perceived ingroup and outgroup norms, and inclusion of the outgroup in the self.

    Rhiannon N. Turner;Miles Hewstone;Alberto Voci;Christiana Vonofakou

  • Intergroup Contact, Forgiveness, and Experience of “The Troubles” in Northern Ireland

    Miles Hewstone;Ed Cairns;Alberto Voci;Juergen Hamberger

  • Multiple social categorization

    Richard J. Crisp;Miles Hewstone

  • PROCESSING LOAD AND MEMORY FOR STEREOTYPE-BASED INFORMATION

    C. Neil Macrae;Miles Hewstone;Riana J. Griffiths

  • Intergroup trust in Northern Ireland.

    Tania Tam;Miles Hewstone;Jared Kenworthy;Ed Cairns

  • European Review of Social Psychology: Stroebe/Social Psychology

    Wolfgang Stroebe;Miles Hewstone

  • The Social Psychologyof Intergroup Relations

    Nicole Tausch;Katharina Schmid;Miles Hewstone

Frequent Co-Authors

Alberto Voci
Alberto Voci University of Padua
Ed Cairns
Ed Cairns University of Ulster
Nicole Tausch
Nicole Tausch University of St Andrews
Robin Martin
Robin Martin University of Manchester
Wolfgang Stroebe
Wolfgang Stroebe University of Groningen
Richard J. Crisp
Richard J. Crisp Durham University
Rhiannon N. Turner
Rhiannon N. Turner Queen's University Belfast
Oliver Christ
Oliver Christ University of Hagen
Steven Vertovec
Steven Vertovec Max Planck Society
Dietlind Stolle
Dietlind Stolle McGill University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens doors to diverse online degrees and rewarding career paths. Many students pursue specializations such as substance abuse counseling or behavior analysis, which are in high demand across the country.

Those interested in counseling may start by learning about Washington DC substance abuse counselor certification requirements, which provide guidelines on education, training, and licensure steps. If you’re considering working in the Midwest, explore the process for becoming a substance abuse counselor in Wichita. Each state’s requirements can vary, so researching your preferred location is important.

For those in North Carolina, check out insights on how to become a substance abuse counselor in Winston Salem. Alternatively, aspiring behavior analysts will find useful details on Albuquerque bcba requirements for Board Certified Behavior Analysts.

No matter your chosen pathway, online degree programs can offer flexibility and comprehensive training to meet certification standards and launch a fulfilling career in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Miles Hewstone

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles