World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
41
Citations
7378
World Ranking
7875
National Ranking
463

Fiona Kate Barlow publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fiona Kate Barlow sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 166 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Fiona Kate Barlow D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fiona Kate Barlow sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Fiona Kate Barlow is affiliated with the University of Queensland in Australia. Their primary research contributions lie in the fields of Social Sciences and Psychology, with a focus on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Gender Studies, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

Their work addresses a range of topics prominently featuring Social and Intergroup Psychology, LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy, Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior, Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology, Gender Roles and Identity Studies, Eating Disorders and Behaviors, as well as the Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment.

Recent published papers include:

  • Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and nationwide lockdown on trust, attitudes toward government, and well-being (2020, American Psychologist)
  • Intergroup contact research in the 21st century: Lessons learned and forward progress if we remain open (2021, Journal of Social Issues)
  • The cosmetic surgery paradox: Toward a contemporary understanding of cosmetic surgery popularisation and attitudes (2021, Body Image)
  • Weight stigma and obesity-related policies: A systematic review of the state of the literature (2021, Obesity Reviews)
  • Surgical satisfaction and quality of life outcomes reported by transgender men and women at least one year post gender-affirming surgery: A systematic literature review (2022, International Journal of Transgender Health)

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Chris G. Sibley
  • Matthew J. Hornsey
  • José J. Morosoli
  • Lara M. Greaves
  • Lucía Colodro-Conde

Barlow's publications often appear in venues such as:

  • Archives of Sexual Behavior
  • Body Image
  • BMJ Open
  • The Journal of Sex Research
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Best Publications

  • The Contact Caveat Negative Contact Predicts Increased Prejudice More Than Positive Contact Predicts Reduced Prejudice

    Fiona Kate Barlow;Stefania Paolini;Anne Pedersen;Matthew J. Hornsey

  • Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and nationwide lockdown on trust, attitudes toward government, and well-being.

    Chris G. Sibley;Lara M. Greaves;Nicole Satherley;Marc S. Wilson

  • Nations' income inequality predicts ambivalence in stereotype content: How societies mind the gap

    Federica Durante;Susan T Fiske;Nicolas Kervyn;Amy J C Cuddy

  • Parasite stress and pathogen avoidance relate to distinct dimensions of political ideology across 30 nations

    Joshua M. Tybur;Yoel Inbar;Lene Aarøe;Pat Barclay

  • Social connectedness improves public mental health: Investigating bidirectional relationships in the New Zealand attitudes and values survey:

    Alexander K Saeri;Tegan Cruwys;Fiona Kate Barlow;Samantha Stronge

  • Toward a Comprehensive Understanding of Intergroup Contact: Descriptions and Mediators of Positive and Negative Contact Among Majority and Minority Groups

    Lydia E. Hayward;Lydia E. Hayward;Linda R. Tropp;Matthew J. Hornsey;Fiona Kate Barlow

  • Weight stigma in maternity care: women’s experiences and care providers’ attitudes

    Kate Mulherin;Yvette D Miller;Yvette D Miller;Fiona Kate Barlow;Phillippa C Diedrichs

  • Rejected! Cognitions of rejection and intergroup anxiety as mediators of the impact of cross-group friendships on prejudice.

    Fiona Kate Barlow;Winnifred R. Louis;Miles Hewstone

  • Whites for racial justice: How contact with Black Americans predicts support for collective action among White Americans:

    Hema Preya Selvanathan;Pirathat Techakesari;Linda R. Tropp;Fiona Kate Barlow

  • Facebook is Linked to Body Dissatisfaction: Comparing Users and Non-Users

    Samantha Stronge;Lara M. Greaves;Petar Milojev;Tim West-Newman

  • Atoning for Colonial Injustices: Group-Based Shame and Guilt Motivate Support for Reparation

    Jesse A. Allpress;Fiona Kate Barlow;Rupert Brown;Winnifred R. Louis

  • How does exposure to thinspiration and fitspiration relate to symptom severity among individuals with eating disorders? Evaluation of a proposed model

    Scott Griffiths;David Castle;Mitchell Cunningham;Stuart B Murray

  • Barriers to women engaging in collective action to overcome sexism.

    Helena R. M. Radke;Matthew J. Hornsey;Fiona Kate Barlow

  • How to lose weight bias fast! Evaluating a brief anti-weight bias intervention

    Phillippa C. Diedrichs;Fiona Kate Barlow

  • The Cambridge Handbook of the Psychology of Prejudice

    Chris G. Sibley;Fiona Kate Barlow

  • An Investigation of Positive and Negative Contact As Predictors of Intergroup Attitudes in the United States, Hong Kong, and Thailand:

    Pirathat Techakesari;Fiona Kate Barlow;Fiona Kate Barlow;Matthew J. Hornsey;Billy Sung

  • Minority report: Social identity, cognitions of rejection and intergroup anxiety predicting prejudice from one racially marginalized group towards another

    Fiona Kate Barlow;Winnifred R. Louis;Deborah J. Terry

  • Theory to social action: A university-based strategy targeting prejudice against Aboriginal Australians

    Anne Pedersen;Fiona Kate Barlow

  • Perceived discrimination predicts increased support for political rights and life satisfaction mediated by ethnic identity: A longitudinal analysis.

    Samantha Stronge;Nikhil K. Sengupta;Fiona Kate Barlow;Danny Osborne

  • Intergroup contact research in the 21st century: Lessons learned and forward progress if we remain open

    Stefania Paolini;Fiona A. White;Linda R. Tropp;Rhiannon N. Turner

  • Rejection as a call to arms: inter-racial hostility and support for political action as outcomes of race-based rejection in majority and minority groups.

    Fiona Kate Barlow;Chris G. Sibley;Matthew J. Hornsey

  • Making Advantaged Racial Groups Care About Inequality: Intergroup Contact as a Route to Psychological Investment:

    Linda R. Tropp;Fiona Kate Barlow

  • The Diversity and Prevalence of Sexual Orientation Self-Labels in a New Zealand National Sample

    Lara M. Greaves;Fiona Kate Barlow;Fiona Kate Barlow;Carol H. J. Lee;Correna M. Matika

Frequent Co-Authors

Chris G. Sibley
Chris G. Sibley University of Auckland
Matthew J. Hornsey
Matthew J. Hornsey University of Queensland
Danny Osborne
Danny Osborne University of Auckland
Winnifred R. Louis
Winnifred R. Louis University of Queensland
Joseph Bulbulia
Joseph Bulbulia Victoria University of Wellington
Marc S. Wilson
Marc S. Wilson Victoria University of Wellington
Taciano L. Milfont
Taciano L. Milfont University of Waikato
Phillippa C. Diedrichs
Phillippa C. Diedrichs University of the West of England
Linda R. Tropp
Linda R. Tropp University of Massachusetts Amherst
Sarah E. Medland
Sarah E. Medland QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The demand for qualified psychology professionals continues to rise, and flexible education options make it easier than ever to advance in this field. Online programs offer accelerated pathways tailored to students with different career goals, whether you aspire to clinical practice, research, or counseling.

Students looking to fast-track their education may consider accelerated online psychology doctorate programs in USA, which provide an efficient route to a doctoral degree. For those specifically interested in programs within Virginia, you can explore accelerated online psychology doctorate programs in Virginia or fastest online psychology master's degrees in Virginia for region-specific options.

Additionally, individuals residing in the Southwest may benefit from learning about accelerated online psychology degrees in Texas. These programs are designed to help you earn your degree swiftly, preparing you for roles in mental health, organizational psychology, academia, and beyond. Choosing the right online pathway can open doors to diverse and rewarding psychology careers.

Best Scientists Citing Fiona Kate Barlow

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles