World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Winnifred R. Louis

Winnifred R. Louis

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 64 3014 2773 147 142 239 13310

Winnifred R. Louis publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Winnifred R. Louis between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Winnifred R. Louis published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 10 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2018. 36 of the 299 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2018. 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 20 publications 2018: 24 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 21 publications 2022: 23 publications 2023: 20 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 19 publications
1996 2025

299 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Winnifred R. Louis: publications per year, 1996 to 2025
Year Publications
1996 1
1997 0
1998 0
1999 1
2000 0
2001 2
2002 4
2003 5
2004 4
2005 5
2006 6
2007 3
2008 5
2009 16
2010 10
2011 8
2012 7
2013 8
2014 14
2015 9
2016 20
2017 20
2018 24
2019 15
2020 12
2021 21
2022 23
2023 20
2024 17
2025 19
Total 299
Download as CSV

Winnifred R. Louis publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Winnifred R. Louis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 231–240 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 239 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226 239
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Winnifred R. Louis D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Winnifred R. Louis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 64–65 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290 64
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Winnifred R. Louis is affiliated with the University of Queensland in Australia. Their research focuses primarily on social sciences and psychology, with 120 publications in social sciences and 62 in psychology. Within these fields, their work spans several subfields including sociology and political science, social psychology, clinical psychology, applied psychology, and health.

The topics addressed in their research include social and intergroup psychology, behavioral health and interventions, COVID-19 and mental health, psychology of moral and emotional judgment, environmental education and sustainability, cultural differences and values, and climate change communication and perception.

Winnifred R. Louis has contributed to multiple research articles and books. Recent papers include:

  • "Social norms, social identities and the COVID-19 pandemic: Theory and recommendations" (2021), Social and Personality Psychology Compass
  • "Politicization of COVID-19 health-protective behaviors in the United States: Longitudinal and cross-national evidence" (2021), PLoS ONE
  • "The Volatility of Collective Action: Theoretical Analysis and Empirical Data" (2020), Political Psychology
  • "MOBILISE: A Higher-Order Integration of Collective Action Research to Address Global Challenges" (2022), Political Psychology
  • "Identity motives in charitable giving: Explanations for charity preferences from a global donor survey" (2020), Psychology and Marketing

In book publications, their work includes contributions published by Cambridge University Press, with titles such as "The Psychology of Effective Activism" (2021) and "The Psychology of System Change and Resistance to Change" (2025).

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Winnifred R. Louis include Kelly S. Fielding, Emma F. Thomas, Mirra Noor Milla, Georgios Abakoumkin, and Edward P. Lemay.

Their research has appeared in several publication venues multiple times, including:

  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
  • European Journal of Social Psychology
  • PLoS ONE
  • Political Psychology
  • Journal of Social and Political Psychology

Best Publications

  • Theory of planned behaviour, identity and intentions to engage in environmental activism

    Kelly S. Fielding;Rachel McDonald;Winnifred R. Louis

  • Congruent or conflicted? The impact of injunctive and descriptive norms on environmental intentions

    Joanne R. Smith;Winnifred R. Louis;Deborah J. Terry;Katharine H. Greenaway

  • The attitude-behavior relationship in consumer conduct: the role of norms, past behavior, and self-identity.

    Joanne R. Smith;Deborah J. Terry;Anthony S. R. Manstead;Winnifred R. Louis

  • Why Do People Engage in Collective Action? Revisiting the Role of Perceived Effectiveness

    Matthew J. Hornsey;Leda Blackwood;Winnifred Louis Louis;Kelly Fielding

  • Do as we say and as we do: The interplay of descriptive and injunctive group norms in the attitude–behaviour relationship

    Joanne R. Smith;Winnifred R. Louis

  • Trust in government regarding COVID-19 and its associations with preventive health behaviour and prosocial behaviour during the pandemic: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study.

    Qing Han;Bang Zheng;Mioara Cristea;Maximilian Agostini

  • Collective Action—and Then What?

    Winnifred R. Louis

  • When will collective action be effective? Violent and non-violent protests differentially influence perceptions of legitimacy and efficacy among sympathizers

    Emma F. Thomas;Winnifred R. Louis

  • Social trust, risk perceptions and public acceptance of recycled water: testing a social-psychological model.

    Victoria L. Ross;Kelly S. Fielding;Winnifred R. Louis

  • Acting in Solidarity: Cross‐Group Contact between Disadvantaged Group Members and Advantaged Group Allies

    Lisa Droogendyk;Stephen C. Wright;Micah Lubensky;Winnifred R. Louis

  • Interaction Effects in the Theory of Planned Behavior: The Interplay of Self‐Identity and Past Behavior

    Joanne R. Smith;Deborah J. Terry;Antony Stephen Reid Manstead;Winnifred R. Louis

  • You did, so you can and you will: Self-efficacy as a mediator of spillover from easy to more difficult pro-environmental behaviour

    Nita Lauren;Kelly S. Fielding;Liam Smith;Winnifred R. Louis

  • Why do citizens want to keep refugees out? Threats, fairness and hostile norms in the treatment of asylum seekers

    Winnifred R. Louis;Julie M. Duck;Deborah J. Terry;Regina A. Schuller

  • Individual differences in local gray matter density are associated with differences in affective and cognitive empathy.

    Robert Steven Eres;Jean Decety;Winnifred R Louis;Pascal Molenberghs

  • Messaging matters: A systematic review of the conservation messaging literature

    Lindall R. Kidd;Lindall R. Kidd;Georgia E. Garrard;Georgia E. Garrard;Sarah A. Bekessy;Sarah A. Bekessy;Sarah A. Bekessy;Morena Mills

  • Pizza and Pop and the Student Identity: The Role of Referent Group Norms in Healthy and Unhealthy Eating

    Winnifred Louis;Sarah Davies;Joanne R. Smith;Deborah J. Terry

  • Group Norms and the Attitude–Behaviour Relationship

    Joanne R. Smith;Winnifred R. Louis

  • Social interaction and psychological pathways to political engagement and extremism

    Emma F Thomas;Craig McGarty;Winnifred R Louis

  • Rejected! Cognitions of rejection and intergroup anxiety as mediators of the impact of cross-group friendships on prejudice.

    Fiona Kate Barlow;Winnifred R. Louis;Miles Hewstone

  • Social norms, social identities and the COVID‐19 pandemic: Theory and recommendations

    Fergus G. Neville;Anne Templeton;Joanne R. Smith;Winnifred R. Louis

  • Nationality Versus Humanity? Personality, Identity, and Norms in Relation to Attitudes Toward Asylum Seekers

    Angela M. Nickerson;Winnifred R. Louis

Frequent Co-Authors

Catherine E. Amiot
Catherine E. Amiot University of Quebec at Montreal
Kelly S. Fielding
Kelly S. Fielding University of Queensland
Deborah J. Terry
Deborah J. Terry University of Queensland
Fiona Kate Barlow
Fiona Kate Barlow University of Queensland
Katharine H. Greenaway
Katharine H. Greenaway University of Melbourne
Matthew J. Hornsey
Matthew J. Hornsey University of Queensland
Donald M. Taylor
Donald M. Taylor McGill University
Jean Decety
Jean Decety University of Chicago
Richard N. Lalonde
Richard N. Lalonde York University
Craig McGarty
Craig McGarty Western Sydney University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens doors to various online degrees and professional pathways. One growing field is speech-language pathology, which offers opportunities to blend psychology, communication, and healthcare expertise.

To pursue a career as a speech-language pathologist, requirements can vary by state. For example, those interested in working in New York should be aware of the New York slp certification requirements. In North Carolina, prospective SLPs should review the specific slp requirements in North Carolina. If you’re considering North Dakota, it’s helpful to know exactly how to become a speech language pathologist in North Dakota.

Similarly, if you plan to work in Ohio, you'll need to understand the current slp requirements in Ohio. Many pathways require at least a master’s degree and supervised clinical experience. Online psychology degrees can help lay the foundation for such roles, supporting varied interests from therapeutic practice to research and healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Winnifred R. Louis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles