World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Martijn van Zomeren

Martijn van Zomeren

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
43
Citations
14541
World Ranking
7092
National Ranking
318

Martijn van Zomeren publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martijn van Zomeren sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 161 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Martijn van Zomeren D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martijn van Zomeren sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martijn van Zomeren is affiliated with the University of Groningen in the Netherlands. Their research spans multiple domains within social sciences and psychology, focusing particularly on social and intergroup psychology and cultural differences and values. With a publication record of 64 works in social sciences and 46 in psychology, their contributions reflect a strong interdisciplinary approach.

Their work covers various subfields, including sociology and political science, social psychology, communication, applied psychology, and cognitive neuroscience. The main topics they address include social and intergroup psychology, cultural differences and values, psychology of moral and emotional judgment, behavioral health and interventions, health disparities and outcomes, social power and status dynamics, as well as international student and expatriate challenges.

Martijn van Zomeren has published frequently in several academic journals, showing a preference for outlets that focus on psychology and social behavior. Some of the most common venues for their work include:

  • European Journal of Social Psychology
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
  • Personality and Social Psychology Review
  • Review of General Psychology

Recent significant papers authored or coauthored by van Zomeren include:

  • "Toward a comprehensive and potentially cross-cultural model of why people engage in collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of four motivations and structural constraints." (2021) Psychological Bulletin
  • "Believing That We Can Change Our World for the Better: A Triple-A (Agent-Action-Aim) Framework of Self-Efficacy Beliefs in the Context of Collective Social and Ecological Aims" (2023) Personality and Social Psychology Review
  • "Disrupting the system constructively: Testing the effectiveness of nonnormative nonviolent collective action." (2020) Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  • "Loneliness across cultures with different levels of social embeddedness: A qualitative study" (2021) Personal Relationships
  • "Protest movements involving limited violence can sometimes be effective: Evidence from the 2020 BlackLivesMatter protests" (2022) Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

The scientist frequently collaborates with several co-authors, reflecting a network of academic partnerships. Notable frequent co-authors include:

  • Eric Shuman
  • Eran Halperin
  • Nina Hansen
  • Gonneke Ton
  • Katherine Stroebe

Best Publications

  • Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives

    Martijn van Zomeren;Tom Postmes;Russell Spears

  • Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification

    Colin Wayne Leach;Martijn van Zomeren;Sven Zebel;Michael L. W. Vliek

  • Put your money where your mouth is! : Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy

    Martijn van Zomeren;Russell Spears;Agneta H. Fischer;Colin Wayne Leach

  • Protesters as “Passionate Economists”: A Dynamic Dual Pathway Model of Approach Coping With Collective Disadvantage

    Martijn van Zomeren;Colin Wayne Leach;Russell Spears

  • On conviction's collective consequences: integrating moral conviction with the social identity model of collective action.

    Martijn van Zomeren;Tom Postmes;Russell Spears

  • Can moral convictions motivate the advantaged to challenge social inequality?: Extending the social identity model of collective action

    van Martijn Zomeren;Tom Postmes;Russell Spears;K. Bettache

  • Introduction to the Social and Psychological Dynamics of Collective Action

    Martijn van Zomeren;Aarti Iyer

  • Exploring psychological mechanisms of collective action: does relevance of group identity influence how people cope with collective disadvantage?

    Martijn van Zomeren;Russell Spears;Russell Spears;Colin Wayne Leach

  • Four Core Social‐Psychological Motivations to Undertake Collective Action

    Martijn van Zomeren

  • Integrating who “we” are with what “we” (will not) stand for: A further extension of the Social Identity Model of Collective Action

    Martijn van Zomeren;Maja Kutlaca;Felicity Turner-Zwinkels

  • Experimental evidence for a dual pathway model analysis of coping with the climate crisis

    Martijn van Zomeren;Russell Spears;Colinn Wayne Leach

  • Believing in “making a difference” to collective efforts: Participative efficacy beliefs as a unique predictor of collective action:

    Martijn van Zomeren;Tamar Saguy;Fabian M. H. Schellhaas

  • Does group efficacy increase group identification? Resolving their paradoxical relationship

    Martijn van Zomeren;Colin Wayne Leach;Russell Spears

  • Toward a comprehensive and potentially cross-cultural model of why people engage in collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of four motivations and structural constraints.

    Unknown

  • The Process Model of Group-Based Emotion Integrating Intergroup Emotion and Emotion Regulation Perspectives

    Amit Goldenberg;Eran Halperin;Martijn van Zomeren;James J. Gross

  • Yes We Can? Group Efficacy Beliefs Predict Collective Action, But Only When Hope is High

    Smadar Cohen-Chen;Martijn Van Zomeren

  • Metaphors of Protest: A Classification of Motivations for Collective Action

    Martijn van Zomeren;Russell Spears

  • Is hope good for motivating collective action in the context of climate change? Differentiating hope's emotion- and problem-focused coping functions

    Martijn van Zomeren;Inga L. Pauls;Smadar Cohen-Chen

  • Lonely Alone or Lonely Together? A Cultural-Psychological Examination of Individualism-Collectivism and Loneliness in Five European Countries.

    Luzia C Heu;Martijn van Zomeren;Nina Hansen

  • Testing the Limits of Tolerance: How Intergroup Anxiety Amplifies Negative and Offensive Responses to Out-Group-Initiated Contact

    Martijn Van Zomeren;Agneta H. Fischer;Russell Spears

  • Dual pathways to engage in ‘Silent Marches’ against violence: moral outrage, moral cleansing and modes of identification

    Hein F. M. Lodewijkx;Gaby L. E. Kersten;Martijn van Zomeren

Frequent Co-Authors

Tom Postmes
Tom Postmes University of Groningen
Russell Spears
Russell Spears University of Groningen
Eran Halperin
Eran Halperin Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Tamar Saguy
Tamar Saguy Reichman University
Colin Wayne Leach
Colin Wayne Leach Barnard College
Sabine Otten
Sabine Otten University of Groningen
John F. Dovidio
John F. Dovidio Yale University
Agneta H. Fischer
Agneta H. Fischer University of Amsterdam
Nicole Tausch
Nicole Tausch University of St Andrews
Bertjan Doosje
Bertjan Doosje University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA can open doors to a variety of career opportunities. Many students consider specializing in areas such as Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA), where becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) is a popular path. The pathway to BCBA certification includes earning a relevant degree, supervised experience, and passing a national exam.

Requirements for BCBA certification can vary by location. For example, those exploring Henderson bcba requirements will notice specific guidelines tailored to that region. Similarly, there are unique steps for individuals looking into Honolulu bcba requirements, with local licensure and professional standards to consider.

Those interested in working in large metropolitan areas can review the process outlined in the Houston bcba requirements. Alternatively, those in smaller cities may want to consult the bcba certification requirements in Huntsville. Each location provides its own set of resources, making it important for aspiring professionals to research the specific pathways best suited for their goals.

Best Scientists Citing Martijn van Zomeren

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles