World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 51 5145 4771 291 283 201 13103

Tegan Cruwys publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Tegan Cruwys between 2008 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Tegan Cruwys published across 18 years, from 2008 to 2025, averaging 15.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 56 publications in 2025. 76 of the 280 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2008 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 56. Peak 56 publications in 2025. 2008: 1 publication 2009: 0 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 6 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 24 publications 2019: 19 publications 2020: 19 publications 2021: 30 publications 2022: 29 publications 2023: 27 publications 2024: 20 publications 2025: 56 publications
2008 2025

280 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Tegan Cruwys: publications per year, 2008 to 2025
Year Publications
2008 1
2009 0
2010 0
2011 0
2012 1
2013 6
2014 7
2015 16
2016 16
2017 9
2018 24
2019 19
2020 19
2021 30
2022 29
2023 27
2024 20
2025 56
Total 280
Download as CSV

Tegan Cruwys publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tegan Cruwys sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 201–210 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 201 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328 201
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Tegan Cruwys D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tegan Cruwys sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445 51
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Tegan Cruwys is affiliated with the Australian National University in Australia and has contributed extensively to the fields of psychology, social sciences, and health professions. Their research covers a range of topics including clinical psychology, general health professions, health outcomes, and social psychology.

Their published works have appeared frequently in journals such as Social Science & Medicine, Psychology of Sport and Exercise, Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, Journal of Affective Disorders, and British Journal of Health Psychology.

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by Tegan Cruwys include:

  • Life Change, Social Identity, and Health (2020) in Annual Review of Psychology
  • Social identity makes group-based social connection possible: Implications for loneliness and mental health (2021) in Current Opinion in Psychology
  • A social identity perspective on COVID-19: Health risk is affected by shared group membership (2020) in British Journal of Social Psychology
  • When trust goes wrong: A social identity model of risk taking (2020) in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  • Evidence that loneliness can be reduced by a whole-of-community intervention to increase neighbourhood identification (2021) in Social Science & Medicine

Frequent co-authors include:

  • Catherine Haslam
  • S. Alexander Haslam
  • Mark R. Stevens
  • Jolanda Jetten
  • Joanne A. Rathbone

Major publication venues where Tegan Cruwys has contributed multiple articles are:

  • Social Science & Medicine
  • Psychology of Sport and Exercise
  • Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology
  • Journal of Affective Disorders
  • British Journal of Health Psychology

Their research explores main topics such as:

  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Behavioral health and interventions
  • Health, psychology, and well-being
  • Community health and development
  • Social and intergroup psychology
  • Posttraumatic stress disorder research
  • Eating disorders and behaviors

Tegan Cruwys has also contributed to academic literature with a forthcoming book titled Groups 4 Health, to be published by Oxford University Press in 2025.

Best Publications

  • Social modeling of eating: A review of when and why social influence affects food intake and choice.

    Tegan Cruwys;Kirsten E. Bevelander;Roel C.J. Hermans

  • The New Psychology of Health : Unlocking the Social Cure

    Catherine Haslam;Jolanda Jetten;Tegan Cruwys;Genevieve A. Dingle

  • Depression and Social Identity An Integrative Review

    Tegan Cruwys;S. Alexander Haslam;Genevieve A. Dingle;Catherine Haslam

  • Social group memberships protect against future depression, alleviate depression symptoms and prevent depression relapse

    Tegan Cruwys;Genevieve A. Dingle;Catherine Haslam;S. Alexander Haslam

  • From “we” to “me”: Group identification enhances perceived personal control with consequences for health and well-being.

    Katharine H. Greenaway;S. Alexander Haslam;Tegan Cruwys;Nyla R. Branscombe

  • Advancing the social identity approach to health and well-being: Progressing the social cure research agenda

    Jolanda Jetten;S. Alexander Haslam;Tegan Cruwys;Katharine H. Greenaway

  • Groups 4 Health: Evidence that a social-identity intervention that builds and strengthens social group membership improves mental health

    Catherine Haslam;Tegan Cruwys;S. Alexander Haslam;Genevieve Dingle

  • Social identities promote well‐being because they satisfy global psychological needs

    Katharine H. Greenaway;Tegan Cruwys;S. Alexander Haslam;Jolanda Jetten

  • Having a lot of a good thing: multiple important group memberships as a source of self-esteem.

    Jolanda Jetten;Nyla R Branscombe;S Alexander Haslam;Catherine Haslam

  • Together apart: The psychology of COVID-19.

    Jolanda Jetten;Stephen D. Reicher;S. Alexander Haslam;Tegan Cruwys

  • Feeling connected again: Interventions that increase social identification reduce depression symptoms in community and clinical settings

    Tegan Cruwys;S. Alexander Haslam;Genevieve A. Dingle;Jolanda Jetten

  • Social Identities as Pathways into and out of Addiction

    Genevieve A. Dingle;Tegan Cruwys;Daniel Frings

  • Social cure, what social cure? The propensity to underestimate the importance of social factors for health.

    S. Alexander Haslam;Charlotte McMahon;Tegan Cruwys;Catherine Haslam

  • Breaking good: breaking ties with social groups may be good for recovery from substance misuse

    Genevieve A. Dingle;Claire Stark;Tegan Cruwys;David Best

  • Social connectedness improves public mental health: Investigating bidirectional relationships in the New Zealand attitudes and values survey:

    Alexander K Saeri;Tegan Cruwys;Fiona Kate Barlow;Samantha Stronge

  • “The we's have it”: Evidence for the distinctive benefits of group engagement in enhancing cognitive health in aging

    Catherine Haslam;Tegan Cruwys;S. Alexander Haslam

  • Stressful life transitions and wellbeing: A comparison of the stress buffering hypothesis and the social identity model of identity change.

    Nurul F. Praharso;Morgan J. Tear;Tegan Cruwys

  • The social psychology of responses to trauma: social identity pathways associated with divergent traumatic responses

    Orla T. Muldoon;S. Alexander Haslam;Catherine Haslam;Tegan Cruwys

  • GROUPS 4 HEALTH reduces loneliness and social anxiety in adults with psychological distress: Findings from a randomized controlled trial.

    Catherine Haslam;Tegan Cruwys;Melissa X. L. Chang;Sarah V. Bentley

  • Social Identity Mapping: A procedure for visual representation and assessment of subjective multiple group memberships.

    Tegan Cruwys;Niklas K. Steffens;S. Alexander Haslam;Catherine Haslam

Frequent Co-Authors

S. Alexander Haslam
S. Alexander Haslam University of Queensland
Catherine Haslam
Catherine Haslam University of Queensland
Jolanda Jetten
Jolanda Jetten University of Queensland
Genevieve A. Dingle
Genevieve A. Dingle University of Queensland
Niklas K. Steffens
Niklas K. Steffens University of Queensland
Katharine H. Greenaway
Katharine H. Greenaway University of Melbourne
Mark P. Stevens
Mark P. Stevens University of Edinburgh
Michael J. Platow
Michael J. Platow Australian National University
Nyla R. Branscombe
Nyla R. Branscombe University of Kansas
Jennifer Fleming
Jennifer Fleming University of Queensland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology opens the door to a variety of academic and career paths. Many students today choose to earn their psychology degree online for added flexibility and convenience. The online format allows for a customizable learning pace, making it accessible to both recent high school graduates and working professionals.

As demand for mental health professionals continues to grow, online degrees can be a stepping stone toward roles in clinical psychology, counseling, research, education, or organizational behavior. Accredited programs feature rigorous curricula, much like traditional on-campus options. If you are comparing your options, it's important to review rankings and program reputations in different regions.

For example, you can view the best psychology degree programs ranking in Austin, explore the top psychology programs in California, check out the best psychology degree programs ranking in Charleston, or research the best psychology degree rankings in Charlotte. Each region offers unique opportunities and potential networking connections for your future career.

Whether your goal is clinical practice, research, or another specialty, pursuing a psychology degree online can position you for success while adapting to your individual schedule and learning preferences.

Best Scientists Citing Tegan Cruwys

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles