World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 35 9789 9161 964 921 84 6077

Mark Tarrant publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark Tarrant between 1999 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark Tarrant published across 28 years, from 1999 to 2026, averaging 3.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2019. 2 of the 99 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2019. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 3 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 3 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 1 publication 2026: 1 publication
1999 2026

99 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark Tarrant: publications per year, 1999 to 2026
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 1
2001 2
2002 2
2003 1
2004 3
2005 0
2006 3
2007 3
2008 0
2009 2
2010 1
2011 3
2012 2
2013 3
2014 4
2015 5
2016 10
2017 9
2018 5
2019 11
2020 5
2021 7
2022 3
2023 3
2024 8
2025 1
2026 1
Total 99
Download as CSV

Mark Tarrant publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Tarrant sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 84 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605 84
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark Tarrant D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Tarrant sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 35
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Mark Tarrant is affiliated with the University of Exeter in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on Medicine, Health Professions, and Psychology. The subfields of study include Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Pharmacy, and Rehabilitation.

The scientist's main research topics cover a diverse range related to health and social care. These include:

  • Obesity and Health Practices
  • Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Family and Disability Support Research
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units

Mark Tarrant has contributed to several academic publications, with notable recent papers including:

  • "Making connections: Social identification with new treatment groups for lifestyle management of severe obesity" (2020), published in Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
  • "Tackling loneliness together: A three-tier social identity framework for social prescribing" (2024), published in Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
  • "Shared social identity and perceived social support among stroke groups during the COVID-19 pandemic: Relationship with psychosocial health" (2022), published in Applied Psychology Health and Well-Being
  • "Singing for people with aphasia (SPA): results of a pilot feasibility randomised controlled trial of a group singing intervention investigating acceptability and feasibility" (2021), published in BMJ Open
  • "Healthy Parent Carers: feasibility randomised controlled trial of a peer-led group-based health promotion intervention for parent carers of disabled children" (2021), published in Pilot and Feasibility Studies

The frequent co-authors of Mark Tarrant include Raff Calitri, Sarah Dean, Jonathan Pinkney, Ruth A. Lamont, and Jenny Lloyd.

Mark Tarrant's works often appear in several publication venues, notably:

  • BMJ Open
  • Pilot and Feasibility Studies
  • Journal of Applied Social Psychology
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • BJGP Open

Best Publications

  • Young people's music in and out of school

    Alexandra Lamont;David J. Hargreaves;Nigel A. Marshall;Mark Tarrant

  • English and American Adolescents' Reasons for Listening to Music

    Mark Tarrant;Adrian C. North;David J. Hargreaves

  • Social Categorization, Self-Esteem, and the Estimated Musical Preferences of Male Adolescents

    Mark Tarrant;Adrian C. North;David J. Hargreaves

  • Adolescent Peer Groups and Social Identity.

    Mark Tarrant

  • Social categorization and empathy for outgroup members.

    Mark Tarrant;Sarah Dazeley;Tom Cottom

  • Can music bring people together? Effects of shared musical preference on intergroup bias in adolescence.

    Sotirios Bakagiannis;Mark Tarrant

  • The effects of music on helping behavior: A field study

    Adrian C. North;Mark Tarrant;David J. Hargreaves

  • Musical preference and taste in childhood and adolescence.

    David J. Hargreaves;Adrian C. North;Mark Tarrant

  • Social identity in adolescence.

    Mark Tarrant;Adrian C. North;Mark D. Edridge;Laura E. Kirk

  • Friendship group identification, multidimensional self-concept, and experience of developmental tasks in adolescence.

    Mark Tarrant;Liam MacKenzie;Lisa A Hewitt

  • Group‐Based Diet and Physical Activity Weight‐Loss Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

    Aleksandra J Borek;Charles Abraham;Colin J Greaves;Mark Tarrant

  • ‘Thinking you're old and frail’: a qualitative study of frailty in older adults

    Krystal Warmoth;Iain A. Lang;Cassandra Phoenix;Charles Abraham

  • Identifying change processes in group-based health behaviour-change interventions: development of the mechanisms of action in group-based interventions (MAGI) framework

    Aleksandra J Borek;Charles Abraham;Colin J Greaves;Fiona Gillison

  • The association between children's contact with people with disabilities and their attitudes towards disability: a systematic review

    Megan MacMillan;Mark Tarrant;Charles Abraham;Christopher Morris

  • Social Identification Structures the Effects of Perspective Taking

    Mark Tarrant;Raff Calitri;Dale Weston

  • Interventions utilising contact with people with disabilities to improve children's attitudes towards disability: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Megan Armstrong;Christopher Morris;Charles Abraham;Mark Tarrant

  • A checklist to improve reporting of group-based behaviour-change interventions

    Aleksandra J. Borek;Charles Abraham;Jane R. Smith;Colin J. Greaves

  • Effects of self-categorization on orientation towards health.

    Mark Tarrant;Kathyrn Butler

  • Children’s contact with people with disabilities and their attitudes towards disability: a cross-sectional study

    Megan Armstrong;Christopher Morris;Charles Abraham;Obioha C Ukoumunne

  • Promoting positive orientation towards health through social identity

    Mark Tarrant;Martin S. Hagger;Claire V. Farrow

Frequent Co-Authors

Charles Abraham
Charles Abraham University of Exeter
Claire V. Farrow
Claire V. Farrow Aston University
Adrian C. North
Adrian C. North Curtin University
David J. Hargreaves
David J. Hargreaves AstraZeneca (United Kingdom)
Fiona Gillison
Fiona Gillison University of Bath
Christopher Morris
Christopher Morris Newcastle University
Chris Code
Chris Code University of Exeter
Obioha C. Ukoumunne
Obioha C. Ukoumunne University of Exeter
Catherine Haslam
Catherine Haslam University of Queensland
Winnifred R. Louis
Winnifred R. Louis University of Queensland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a career in psychology, online degrees can be a flexible option to start or advance your education. Programs are available at bachelor’s, master’s, and doctoral levels, with many offering specializations in areas such as clinical psychology, counseling, or mental health. Online degrees are designed to accommodate busy schedules, making them ideal for working professionals or those balancing family commitments.

After earning your degree, the next step for many is pursuing licensure. It’s important to note that requirements vary by state and city. For example, those wanting to know how to become a licensed therapist in Baltimore will find requirements tailored to Maryland’s standards. Similarly, Boise licensed therapist requirements reflect Idaho’s guidelines, while Boston licensed therapist education requirements are specific to Massachusetts.

Exploring Buffalo licensed therapist requirements can help those interested in practicing in New York. Be sure to check the educational, experiential, and examination requirements for your desired location.

With the right education and careful planning, online psychology degrees can open diverse and rewarding career pathways in mental health and therapeutic services nationwide.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Tarrant

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles