World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
35
Citations
6077
World Ranking
9789
National Ranking
964

Mark Tarrant publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Tarrant sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 84 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Mark Tarrant D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Tarrant sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark Tarrant is affiliated with the University of Exeter in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on Medicine, Health Professions, and Psychology. The subfields of study include Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Pharmacy, and Rehabilitation.

The scientist's main research topics cover a diverse range related to health and social care. These include:

  • Obesity and Health Practices
  • Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Family and Disability Support Research
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units

Mark Tarrant has contributed to several academic publications, with notable recent papers including:

  • "Making connections: Social identification with new treatment groups for lifestyle management of severe obesity" (2020), published in Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
  • "Tackling loneliness together: A three-tier social identity framework for social prescribing" (2024), published in Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
  • "Shared social identity and perceived social support among stroke groups during the COVID-19 pandemic: Relationship with psychosocial health" (2022), published in Applied Psychology Health and Well-Being
  • "Singing for people with aphasia (SPA): results of a pilot feasibility randomised controlled trial of a group singing intervention investigating acceptability and feasibility" (2021), published in BMJ Open
  • "Healthy Parent Carers: feasibility randomised controlled trial of a peer-led group-based health promotion intervention for parent carers of disabled children" (2021), published in Pilot and Feasibility Studies

The frequent co-authors of Mark Tarrant include Raff Calitri, Sarah Dean, Jonathan Pinkney, Ruth A. Lamont, and Jenny Lloyd.

Mark Tarrant's works often appear in several publication venues, notably:

  • BMJ Open
  • Pilot and Feasibility Studies
  • Journal of Applied Social Psychology
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • BJGP Open

Best Publications

  • Young people's music in and out of school

    Alexandra Lamont;David J. Hargreaves;Nigel A. Marshall;Mark Tarrant

  • English and American Adolescents' Reasons for Listening to Music

    Mark Tarrant;Adrian C. North;David J. Hargreaves

  • Social Categorization, Self-Esteem, and the Estimated Musical Preferences of Male Adolescents

    Mark Tarrant;Adrian C. North;David J. Hargreaves

  • Adolescent Peer Groups and Social Identity.

    Mark Tarrant

  • Social categorization and empathy for outgroup members.

    Mark Tarrant;Sarah Dazeley;Tom Cottom

  • Can music bring people together? Effects of shared musical preference on intergroup bias in adolescence.

    Sotirios Bakagiannis;Mark Tarrant

  • Social identification-building interventions to improve health: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Niklas K Steffens;Crystal J LaRue;Catherine Haslam;Zoe C Walter

  • The effects of music on helping behavior: A field study

    Adrian C. North;Mark Tarrant;David J. Hargreaves

  • Musical preference and taste in childhood and adolescence.

    David J. Hargreaves;Adrian C. North;Mark Tarrant

  • Social identity in adolescence.

    Mark Tarrant;Adrian C. North;Mark D. Edridge;Laura E. Kirk

  • Friendship group identification, multidimensional self-concept, and experience of developmental tasks in adolescence.

    Mark Tarrant;Liam MacKenzie;Lisa A Hewitt

  • Group‐Based Diet and Physical Activity Weight‐Loss Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

    Aleksandra J Borek;Charles Abraham;Colin J Greaves;Mark Tarrant

  • ‘Thinking you're old and frail’: a qualitative study of frailty in older adults

    Krystal Warmoth;Iain A. Lang;Cassandra Phoenix;Charles Abraham

  • Identifying change processes in group-based health behaviour-change interventions: development of the mechanisms of action in group-based interventions (MAGI) framework

    Aleksandra J Borek;Charles Abraham;Colin J Greaves;Fiona Gillison

  • The association between children's contact with people with disabilities and their attitudes towards disability: a systematic review

    Megan MacMillan;Mark Tarrant;Charles Abraham;Christopher Morris

  • Social Identification Structures the Effects of Perspective Taking

    Mark Tarrant;Raff Calitri;Dale Weston

  • Interventions utilising contact with people with disabilities to improve children's attitudes towards disability: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Megan Armstrong;Christopher Morris;Charles Abraham;Mark Tarrant

  • A checklist to improve reporting of group-based behaviour-change interventions

    Aleksandra J. Borek;Charles Abraham;Jane R. Smith;Colin J. Greaves

  • Effects of self-categorization on orientation towards health.

    Mark Tarrant;Kathyrn Butler

  • Children’s contact with people with disabilities and their attitudes towards disability: a cross-sectional study

    Megan Armstrong;Christopher Morris;Charles Abraham;Obioha C Ukoumunne

  • Promoting positive orientation towards health through social identity

    Mark Tarrant;Martin S. Hagger;Claire V. Farrow

Frequent Co-Authors

Charles Abraham
Charles Abraham University of Exeter
Claire V. Farrow
Claire V. Farrow Aston University
Adrian C. North
Adrian C. North Curtin University
David J. Hargreaves
David J. Hargreaves AstraZeneca (United Kingdom)
Fiona Gillison
Fiona Gillison University of Bath
Christopher Morris
Christopher Morris Newcastle University
Chris Code
Chris Code University of Exeter
Obioha C. Ukoumunne
Obioha C. Ukoumunne University of Exeter
Catherine Haslam
Catherine Haslam University of Queensland
Winnifred R. Louis
Winnifred R. Louis University of Queensland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a career in psychology, online degrees can be a flexible option to start or advance your education. Programs are available at bachelor’s, master’s, and doctoral levels, with many offering specializations in areas such as clinical psychology, counseling, or mental health. Online degrees are designed to accommodate busy schedules, making them ideal for working professionals or those balancing family commitments.

After earning your degree, the next step for many is pursuing licensure. It’s important to note that requirements vary by state and city. For example, those wanting to know how to become a licensed therapist in Baltimore will find requirements tailored to Maryland’s standards. Similarly, Boise licensed therapist requirements reflect Idaho’s guidelines, while Boston licensed therapist education requirements are specific to Massachusetts.

Exploring Buffalo licensed therapist requirements can help those interested in practicing in New York. Be sure to check the educational, experiential, and examination requirements for your desired location.

With the right education and careful planning, online psychology degrees can open diverse and rewarding career pathways in mental health and therapeutic services nationwide.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Tarrant

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles