World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 86 1117 978 690 588 192 38471

Daphna Oyserman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Daphna Oyserman between 1970 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Daphna Oyserman published across 56 years, from 1970 to 2025, averaging 4 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2008. 18 of the 222 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1970 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2008. 1970: 1 publication 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 2 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 3 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 4 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 9 publications
1970 2025

222 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Daphna Oyserman: publications per year, 1970 to 2025
Year Publications
1970 1
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 2
1988 0
1989 1
1990 2
1991 1
1992 3
1993 6
1994 2
1995 5
1996 2
1997 4
1998 3
1999 1
2000 4
2001 8
2002 11
2003 7
2004 5
2005 4
2006 8
2007 9
2008 12
2009 7
2010 8
2011 3
2012 4
2013 12
2014 7
2015 11
2016 5
2017 10
2018 6
2019 4
2020 7
2021 7
2022 8
2023 4
2024 9
2025 9
Total 222
Download as CSV

Daphna Oyserman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daphna Oyserman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 191–200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 192 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343 192
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Daphna Oyserman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daphna Oyserman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 86–87 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 86 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101 86
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2019 - Fellow of the American Educational Research Association
  • 2002 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Daphna Oyserman is affiliated with the University of Southern California in the United States. Their primary field of study is psychology, with a total of 33 publications. They also contribute extensively to the social sciences, with 21 publications in that area.

Their research spans multiple subfields, including social psychology, sociology and political science, experimental and cognitive psychology, cognitive neuroscience, and developmental and educational psychology. The distribution of publications across these subfields reflects a multidisciplinary approach within the behavioral sciences.

Main topics of Oyserman's work include cultural differences and values, social and intergroup psychology, psychology of moral and emotional judgment, youth development and social support, psychological and temporal perspectives research, early childhood education and development, and identity, memory, and therapy.

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Oyserman include:

  • "Process matters: Teachers benefit their classrooms and students when they deliver an identity-based motivation intervention with fidelity," 2021, Contemporary Educational Psychology
  • "Successful Learning Environments Support and Harness Students' Identity-based Motivation: A Primer," 2021, The Journal of Experimental Education
  • "Seeing meaning even when none may exist: Collectivism increases belief in empty claims," 2021, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  • "Is Difficulty Mostly About Impossibility? What Difficulty Implies May Be Culturally Variant," 2021, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
  • "Difficulty-as-Improvement: The Courage to Keep Going in the Face of Life's Difficulties," 2023, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Frequent co-authors with whom Oyserman has collaborated include Veronica X. Yan, Gülnaz Kiper, Ying Lin, S. Casey O'Donnell, and Mohammad Atari. These collaborations reflect ongoing research relationships across related studies.

Oyserman's work has been published in a variety of academic venues, with repeated contributions to the following journals:

  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
  • Self and Identity
  • Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • The Journal of Experimental Education
  • PLoS ONE

In recognition of their professional accomplishments and contributions to the field, Oyserman has been named a Fellow of the American Psychological Association in 2002 and a Fellow of the American Educational Research Association in 2019.

Best Publications

  • Rethinking individualism and collectivism: evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses.

    Daphna Oyserman;Heather M. Coon;Markus Kemmelmeier

  • Does culture influence what and how we think? Effects of priming individualism and collectivism.

    Daphna Oyserman;Spike W. S. Lee

  • Self, self-concept, and identity.

    Daphna Oyserman;Kristen Elmore;George Smith

  • Possible selves and academic outcomes: How and when possible selves impel action.

    Daphna Oyserman;Deborah Bybee;Kathy Terry

  • Possible selves and delinquency.

    Daphna Oyserman;Hazel Rose Markus

  • Asking questions about behavior: cognition, communication, and questionnaire construction

    Norbert Schwarz;Daphna Oyserman

  • A Socially Contextualized Model of African American Identity: Possible Selves and School Persistence

    Daphna Oyserman;Larry Gant;Joel Ager

  • Possible selves as roadmaps

    Daphna Oyserman;Deborah I. Bybee;Kathy Terry;Tamera A. Hart-Johnson

  • Identity-Based Motivation: Implications for Intervention

    Daphna Oyserman;Mesmin P. Destin

  • A possible selves intervention to enhance school involvement.

    Daphna Oyserman;Kathy Terry;Deborah Bybee

  • Thinking about the self influences thinking in general: cognitive consequences of salient self-concept

    Ulrich Kühnen;Daphna Oyserman

  • The lens of personhood: Viewing the self and others in a multicultural society.

    Daphna Oyserman

  • Identity-based motivation and health.

    Daphna Oyserman;Stephanie A. Fryberg;Nicholas Yoder

  • Identity-based motivation: Implications for action-readiness, procedural-readiness, and consumer behavior

    Daphna Oyserman

  • Racial- ethnic identity in mid-adolescence : Content and change as predictors of academic achievement

    Inna Altschul;Daphna Oyserman;Deborah I. Bybee

  • Gender and Thought: The Role of the Self-Concept

    Hazel Markus;Daphna Oyserman

  • Parenting among mothers with a serious mental illness.

    Daphna Oyserman;Carol T. Mowbray;Paula Allen Meares;B B A Kirsten Firminger

  • The Possible Selves of Diverse Adolescents: Content and Function Across Gender, Race and National Origin

    Daphna Oyserman;Stephanie Fryberg

  • Of Warrior Chiefs and Indian Princesses: The Psychological Consequences of American Indian Mascots

    Stephanie A. Fryberg;Hazel Rose Markus;Daphna Oyserman;Joseph M. Stone

  • The Sociocultural Self

    Daphna Oyserman;Hazel Rose Markus

Frequent Co-Authors

Deborah Bybee
Deborah Bybee Michigan State University
Carol T. Mowbray
Carol T. Mowbray University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Norbert Schwarz
Norbert Schwarz University of Southern California
Ayse K. Uskul
Ayse K. Uskul University of Sussex
Rami Benbenishty
Rami Benbenishty Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Hazel Rose Markus
Hazel Rose Markus Stanford University
Peter W. Macfarlane
Peter W. Macfarlane University of Glasgow
Markus Kemmelmeier
Markus Kemmelmeier University of Nevada Reno
Carolyn Yoon
Carolyn Yoon University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
James S. Jackson
James S. Jackson University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens doors to a wide range of rewarding career pathways—especially in counseling. Many states offer accelerated or flexible programs, allowing students to start making a difference sooner. For those interested in direct guidance, consider reviewing the fastest way to become a counselor in South Dakota to understand the basic requirements and steps for licensure.

While some states share similar pathways, regional differences can impact how quickly you can enter the field. For example, learning about the fastest way to become a counselor in Tennessee provides insight into state-specific educational standards and preparation.

Some states, like Texas, offer unique guidance on the quickest path to becoming a counselor in Texas, outlining steps from online coursework to supervised experience. Meanwhile, others, such as Utah, promote accessibility through flexible study formats, highlighted by Utah accelerated counseling programs.

By choosing the right online program and understanding state-specific pathways, you can fast-track your journey toward a meaningful psychology career in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Daphna Oyserman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles