World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
37
Citations
15064
World Ranking
8999
National Ranking
4768

Markus Kemmelmeier publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Markus Kemmelmeier sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 124 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Markus Kemmelmeier D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Markus Kemmelmeier sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Markus Kemmelmeier is affiliated with the University of Nevada Reno in the United States. Their research primarily spans the social sciences, with a significant focus on psychology. The subfields of their work include sociology and political science, social psychology, cognitive neuroscience, health, and political science and international relations.

The scientist's research topics cover a range of areas, including social and intergroup psychology, cultural differences and values, psychology of moral and emotional judgment, health disparities and outcomes, emotions and moral behavior, psychological well-being and life satisfaction, and populism and right-wing movements.

Markus Kemmelmeier has contributed to several publication venues, with multiple works appearing in Frontiers in Psychology, Journal of Social and Political Psychology, and Collabra Psychology. Other venues include Current Psychology and the Journal of Well-Being Assessment.

  • Mask Wearing as Cultural Behavior: An Investigation Across 45 U.S. States During the COVID-19 Pandemic (2021) - Frontiers in Psychology
  • Plenty of blame to go around: Attributions of responsibility in a fatal autonomous vehicle accident (2021) - Current Psychology
  • Multi-level modelling of time-series cross-sectional data reveals the dynamic interaction between ecological threats and democratic development (2020) - Royal Society Open Science
  • Assessing Well-Being Across Space and Time: Measurement Equivalence of the WHO-5 in 36 European Countries and Over 8 Years (2020) - Journal of Well-Being Assessment
  • Remnants of Communism and Present-Day Inequality (2020) - Cross-Cultural Research

In book publications, Markus Kemmelmeier has contributed to "The Cultural Psychology of the COVID-19 Pandemic" published by Frontiers Media in 2023.

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers, including Waleed A. Jami, Kodai Kusano, Крум Крумов, Knud S. Larsen, and Albena Krumova.

Best Publications

  • Rethinking individualism and collectivism: evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses.

    Daphna Oyserman;Heather M. Coon;Markus Kemmelmeier

  • Mood and Stereotyping: Affective States and the Use of General Knowledge Structures

    Herbert Bless;Norbert Schwarz;Markus Kemmelmeier

  • Cultural Orientations in the United States (Re)Examining Differences among Ethnic Groups

    Heather M. Coon;Markus Kemmelmeier

  • What Predicts Loneliness? Cultural Difference Between Individualistic and Collectivistic Societies in Europe:

    Valerie A. Lykes;Markus Kemmelmeier

  • Racial-ethnic self-schemas.

    Daphna Oyserman;Markus Kemmelmeier;Stephanie Fryberg;Hezi Brosh

  • Cultural psychology, A new look: reply to Bond (2002), Fiske (2002), Kitayama (2002), and Miller (2002).

    Daphna Oyserman;Markus Kemmelmeier;Heather M. Coon

  • Values, Economics, and Proenvironmental Attitudes in 22 Societies

    Markus Kemmelmeier;Grzegorz Król;Young Hun Kim

  • Individualism, Collectivism, and Authoritarianism in Seven Societies

    Markus Kemmelmeier;Eugene Burnstein;Krum Krumov;Petia Genkova

  • Long-Term Psychological Consequences in Women of Witnessing Parental Physical Conflict and Experiencing Abuse in Childhood

    Azmaira Hamid Maker;Markus Kemmelmeier;Christopher Peterson

  • Sowing Patriotism, But Reaping Nationalism? Consequences of Exposure to the American Flag

    Markus Kemmelmeier;David G. Winter

  • Child sexual abuse, peer sexual abuse, and sexual assault in adulthood: a multi-risk model of revictimization.

    Azmaira Hamid Maker;Markus Kemmelmeier;Christopher Peterson

  • Individualism and Good Works: Cultural Variation in Giving and Volunteering Across the United States

    Markus Kemmelmeier;Edina E. Jambor;Joyce Letner

  • Ethnicity and Contemporary American Culture A Meta-Analytic Investigation of Horizontal–Vertical Individualism–Collectivism

    Jose H. Vargas;Markus Kemmelmeier

  • Is there a relationship between political orientation and cognitive ability? A test of three hypotheses in two studies

    Markus Kemmelmeier

  • Need for Closure and Political Orientation Among German University Students

    Markus Kemmelmeier

  • Cross-Cultural Differences in a Global “Survey of World Views”:

    Gerard Saucier;Judith Kenner;Kathryn Iurino;Philippe Bou Malham

  • Opposite Ends of the Same Stick? Multi-Method Test of the Dimensionality of Individualism and Collectivism

    Vas Taras;Riikka Sarala;Paul Muchinsky;Markus Kemmelmeier

  • Language and Self-Construal Priming A Replication and Extension in a Hong Kong Sample

    Markus Kemmelmeier;Belinda Yan-Ming Cheng

  • The Ups and Downs of Thinking About a Successful Other: Self Construals and the Consequences of Social Comparisons

    Markus Kemmelmeier;Daphna Oyserman

  • Inept Reasoners or Pragmatic Virtuosos? Relevance and the Deontic Selection Task

    Vittorio Girotto;Vittorio Girotto;Markus Kemmelmeier;Dan Sperber;Jean-Baptiste van der Henst

  • Mask Wearing as Cultural Behavior: An Investigation Across 45 U.S. States During the COVID-19 Pandemic

    Markus Kemmelmeier;Waleed A. Jami

Frequent Co-Authors

Daphna Oyserman
Daphna Oyserman University of Southern California
David G. Winter
David G. Winter University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Vittorio Girotto
Vittorio Girotto Università Iuav di Venezia
Denis J. Hilton
Denis J. Hilton Federal University of Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées
Katherine M. Iverson
Katherine M. Iverson Boston University
Dan Sperber
Dan Sperber Central European University
Herbert Bless
Herbert Bless University of Mannheim
Norbert Schwarz
Norbert Schwarz University of Southern California
Barbara Landau
Barbara Landau Johns Hopkins University
José L. Luque
José L. Luque Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in psychology opens many doors, from clinical therapy to counseling and research. Earning a psychology degree online can be a flexible way to start, but it’s crucial to understand the steps needed for licensure in your specific location. Each state—and sometimes even city—has unique requirements for education, supervised experience, and exams.

For example, if you want to learn how to become a licensed therapist in Columbus, you’ll need to complete a master’s degree in counseling or a related field, acquire supervised clinical hours, and pass the required exams. Those seeking guidance on Corpus Christi licensed therapist education requirements will find some similarities, but also distinct state and local nuances to navigate.

The pathway to licensure can also differ for those exploring Dallas licensed therapist education requirements, especially regarding approved coursework and application processes. Meanwhile, aspiring professionals should also review the Denver licensed therapist requirements for specific insights unique to Colorado regulations.

No matter where you plan to practice, researching online degree programs and understanding your area’s licensure criteria will position you for success in the growing field of mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Markus Kemmelmeier

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles