World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Thomas Mitchell-Olds

Thomas Mitchell-Olds

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
96
Citations
34195
World Ranking
1821
National Ranking
1005

Thomas Mitchell-Olds publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Mitchell-Olds sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 274 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Thomas Mitchell-Olds D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Mitchell-Olds sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 96 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2017 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Thomas Mitchell-Olds is affiliated with Duke University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology.

Their work involves several key subfields including Plant Science, Genetics, Molecular Biology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, and Nature and Landscape Conservation.

Thomas Mitchell-Olds has contributed to research topics such as Genetic diversity and population structure, Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies, Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics, Genomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stress, Moringa oleifera research and applications, Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals, and Plant and animal studies.

Recent papers by this researcher include:

  • Ecological factors influence balancing selection on leaf chemical profiles of a wildflower (2021) published in Nature Ecology & Evolution
  • Genetic architecture and adaptation of flowering time among environments (2021) published in New Phytologist
  • Chromosomal Evolution and Apomixis in the Cruciferous Tribe Boechereae (2020) published in Frontiers in Plant Science
  • An epigenetic pathway in rice connects genetic variation to anaerobic germination and seedling establishment (2021) published in PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
  • Are genetic variation and demographic performance linked? (2022) published in Evolutionary Applications

Frequent publication venues for Thomas Mitchell-Olds include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), UNC Libraries, Nature Ecology & Evolution, and New Phytologist.

They frequently collaborate with several coauthors such as Maggie R. Wagner, Catherine A. Rushworth, Lauren N. Carley, Baosheng Wang, and Ya-Ping Lin.

Thomas Mitchell-Olds was awarded the status of Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2017.

Best Publications

  • The draft genome of the transgenic tropical fruit tree papaya (Carica papaya Linnaeus)

    Ray Ming;Shaobin Hou;Yun Feng;Qingyi Yu

  • Comparative Evolutionary Analysis of Chalcone Synthase and Alcohol Dehydrogenase Loci in Arabidopsis, Arabis, and Related Genera (Brassicaceae)

    Marcus A. Koch;Bernhard Haubold;Thomas Mitchell-Olds

  • Regression analysis of natural selection statistical inference and biological interpretation

    Thomas Mitchell‐Olds;Ruth G. Shaw

  • Host genotype and age shape the leaf and root microbiomes of a wild perennial plant

    Maggie R. Wagner;Derek S Lundberg;Tijana G. del Rio;Susannah G. Tringe

  • Genetic control of natural variation in Arabidopsis glucosinolate accumulation.

    Daniel J. Kliebenstein;Juergen Kroymann;Paul Brown;Antje Figuth

  • Which evolutionary processes influence natural genetic variation for phenotypic traits

    Thomas Mitchell-Olds;John H. Willis;David B. Goldstein

  • Disarming the mustard oil bomb

    Andreas Ratzka;Heiko Vogel;Daniel J. Kliebenstein;Thomas Mitchell-Olds

  • Anova for Unbalanced Data: An Overview

    Ruth G. Shaw;Thomas Mitchell-Olds

  • Successful herbivore attack due to metabolic diversion of a plant chemical defense

    Ute Wittstock;Niels Agerbirk;Einar J. Stauber;Carl Erik Olsen

  • The ABC's of comparative genomics in the Brassicaceae: building blocks of crucifer genomes

    M. Eric Schranz;Martin A. Lysak;Martin A. Lysak;Thomas Mitchell-Olds

  • Phenotypic plasticity and adaptive evolution contribute to advancing flowering phenology in response to climate change

    Jill T. Anderson;David W. Inouye;David W. Inouye;Amy M. McKinney;Amy M. McKinney;Robert I. Colautti

  • The Arabidopsis Epithiospecifier Protein Promotes the Hydrolysis of Glucosinolates to Nitriles and Influences Trichoplusia ni Herbivory

    Virginia Lambrix;Michael Reichelt;Thomas Mitchell-Olds;Daniel J. Kliebenstein

  • Molecular systematics of the Brassicaceae: evidence from coding plastidic matK and nuclear Chs sequences

    Marcus Koch;Bernhard Haubold;Thomas Mitchell-Olds

  • Evolutionary genetics of plant adaptation

    Jill T. Anderson;John H. Willis;Thomas Mitchell-Olds

  • Genetic mechanisms and evolutionary significance of natural variation in Arabidopsis

    Thomas Mitchell-Olds;Johanna Schmitt

  • Genetics of drought adaptation in Arabidopsis thaliana: I. Pleiotropy contributes to genetic correlations among ecological traits

    J. K. Mckay;J. H. Richards;T. Mitchell-Olds

  • Evolutionary and ecological functional genomics.

    Martin E Feder;Thomas Mitchell-Olds

  • Gene duplication in the diversification of secondary metabolism: tandem 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases control glucosinolate biosynthesis in Arabidopsis.

    Daniel J. Kliebenstein;Virginia M. Lambrix;Michael Reichelt;Jonathan Gershenzon

  • Genetic isolation by distance in Arabidopsis thaliana: biogeography and postglacial colonization of Europe

    Timothy F. Sharbel;Bernhard Haubold;Thomas Mitchell-Olds

  • Rapid evolution in plant chitinases: molecular targets of selection in plant-pathogen coevolution.

    J. G. Bishop;A. M. Dean;T. Mitchell-Olds

Frequent Co-Authors

Jill T. Anderson
Jill T. Anderson University of Georgia
M. Eric Schranz
M. Eric Schranz Wageningen University & Research
Marcus A. Koch
Marcus A. Koch Heidelberg University
Jonathan Gershenzon
Jonathan Gershenzon Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology
Daniel J. Kliebenstein
Daniel J. Kliebenstein University of California, Davis
Heiko Vogel
Heiko Vogel Max Planck Society
Jeremy Schmutz
Jeremy Schmutz Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Martin A. Lysak
Martin A. Lysak Masaryk University
Daniel S. Rokhsar
Daniel S. Rokhsar University of California, Berkeley
Michael Reichelt
Michael Reichelt Max Planck Society

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry opens many doors in the US job market, especially when paired with related online programs. For those interested in mental health, taking psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner programs online can be a fast-tracked option to start a career in a high-demand field.

If nutrition and wellness are more your focus, a 2 year nutrition degree online can quickly prepare you for opportunities in dietetics, food science, or public health. Alternatively, advancing to leadership roles within healthcare settings is possible by completing an mba healthcare management online, a strong complement to a life sciences background.

Beyond clinical or research roles, many graduates consider careers in medical coding. Understanding the distinctions between certifications like ccs vs cpc is crucial for making informed career decisions in medical data and billing.

By aligning your studies with these flexible online options, you can forge a career path that suits your interests and the evolving healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas Mitchell-Olds

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles