World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
64
Citations
10908
World Ranking
9912
National Ranking
4340

Thomas E. Juenger publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas E. Juenger sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 1,569 publications — 100th percentile

100% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Thomas E. Juenger D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas E. Juenger sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas E. Juenger is affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines primarily within environmental and earth sciences, with significant contributions to fields such as Environmental Science, Earth and Planetary Sciences, and Physics and Astronomy.

Their work frequently addresses subfields including Environmental Chemistry, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Oceanography, Geophysics, and Plant Science. A significant portion of their research involves topics like Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena, Ionosphere and Magnetosphere Dynamics, Geophysics and Gravity Measurements, Seismic Waves and Analysis, Bioenergy Crop Production and Management, Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology, and Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals.

Thomas E. Juenger has contributed to numerous scientific publications, appearing in several key venues. Recurring publication outlets include the OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information), bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), New Phytologist, The Plant Cell, and the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Their recent papers illustrate a focus on plant adaptation, genomics, and environmental interactions:

  • Genomic mechanisms of climate adaptation in polyploid bioenergy switchgrass, 2021, Nature
  • Burning questions for a warming and changing world: 15 unknowns in plant abiotic stress, 2022, The Plant Cell
  • Genomics of sorghum local adaptation to a parasitic plant, 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Gene-by-environment interactions in plants: Molecular mechanisms, environmental drivers, and adaptive plasticity, 2022, The Plant Cell
  • Artificial Selection on Microbiomes To Breed Microbiomes That Confer Salt Tolerance to Plants, 2021, mSystems

Frequent collaborators in their research include Felix Fritschi, Julie Jastrow, Roser Matamala, Michael Ricketts, and Jason Toyoda, reflecting a broad network of co-authors supporting diverse research topics.

Best Publications

  • Genotype-by-Environment Interaction and Plasticity: Exploring Genomic Responses of Plants to the Abiotic Environment

    David L. Des Marais;Kyle M. Hernandez;Thomas E. Juenger

  • Genome-environment associations in sorghum landraces predict adaptive traits.

    Jesse R. Lasky;Hari D. Upadhyaya;Hari D. Upadhyaya;Hari D. Upadhyaya;Punna Ramu;Punna Ramu;Santosh Deshpande

  • Extensive gene content variation in the Brachypodium distachyon pan-genome correlates with population structure

    Sean P. Gordon;Bruno Contreras-Moreira;Daniel P. Woods;Daniel P. Woods;David L. Des Marais;David L. Des Marais

  • Characterizing genomic variation of Arabidopsis thaliana: the roles of geography and climate.

    Jesse R. Lasky;David L. Des Marais;John K. McKAY;James H. Richards

  • Genomic mechanisms of climate adaptation in polyploid bioenergy switchgrass.

    John T. Lovell;Alice H. MacQueen;Sujan Mamidi;Jason Bonnette

  • Identification and characterization of QTL underlying whole‐plant physiology in Arabidopsis thaliana: δ13C, stomatal conductance and transpiration efficiency

    Thomas E. Juenger;John K. Mckay;Neil Hausmann;Joost J. B. Keurentjes

  • Drought, metabolites, and Arabidopsis natural variation: a promising combination for understanding adaptation to water-limited environments.

    Paul E Verslues;Thomas E Juenger

  • THE EVOLUTION OF COMPENSATION TO HERBIVORY IN SCARLET GILIA, IPOMOPSIS AGGREGATA: HERBIVORE-IMPOSED NATURAL SELECTION AND THE QUANTITATIVE GENETICS OF TOLERANCE

    Thomas E Juenger;Joy Bergelson

  • Arabidopsis ECERIFERUM9 Involvement in Cuticle Formation and Maintenance of Plant Water Status

    Shiyou Lu;Huayan Zhao;David L. Des Marais;Eugene P. Parsons

  • POLLEN AND RESOURCE LIMITATION OF COMPENSATION TO HERBIVORY IN SCARLET GILIA, IPOMOPSIS AGGREGATA

    Thomas Juenger;Thomas Juenger;Joy Bergelson

  • Physiological Genomics of Response to Soil Drying in Diverse Arabidopsis Accessions

    David L. Des Marais;John K. McKay;James H. Richards;Saunak Sen

  • Natural variation and genetic constraints on drought tolerance

    Thomas E Juenger

  • Natural Variation in Abiotic Stress Responsive Gene Expression and Local Adaptation to Climate in Arabidopsis thaliana

    Jesse R. Lasky;Jesse R. Lasky;David L. Des Marais;David B. Lowry;Inna Povolotskaya

  • Direct and indirect selection on flowering time, water-use efficiency (WUE, δ (13)C), and WUE plasticity to drought in Arabidopsis thaliana.

    Amanda M. Kenney;John K. McKay;James H. Richards;Thomas E. Juenger

  • Genetics of Drought Adaptation in Arabidopsis thaliana II. Qtl Analysis of a New Mapping Population, Kas-1 × Tsu-1

    John K. McKay;James H. Richards;Krishna S. Nemali;Saunak Sen

  • Pleiotropy of FRIGIDA enhances the potential for multivariate adaptation

    John T. Lovell;Thomas E. Juenger;Scott D. Michaels;Jesse R. Lasky

  • Intron-mediated alternative splicing of Arabidopsis P5CS1 and its association with natural variation in proline and climate adaptation

    Ravi Kesari;Jesse R. Lasky;Joji Grace Villamor;Joji Grace Villamor;David L. Des Marais

  • Genetic variation in responses to a settlement cue and elevated temperature in the reef-building coral Acropora millepora

    Eli Meyer;Sarah Davies;Shi Wang;Bette L. Willis

  • Quantitative trait loci mapping of floral and leaf morphology traits in Arabidopsis thaliana: evidence for modular genetic architecture

    Thomas E Juenger;José Manuel Pérez-Pérez;Salvador Bernal;José Luis Micol

  • PAIRWISE VERSUS DIFFUSE NATURAL SELECTION AND THE MULTIPLE HERBIVORES OF SCARLET GILIA, IPOMOPSIS AGGREGATA.

    Thomas Juenger;Thomas Juenger;Joy Bergelson

Frequent Co-Authors

James H. Richards
James H. Richards University of California, Davis
Jeremy Schmutz
Jeremy Schmutz Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Philip A. Fay
Philip A. Fay Agricultural Research Service
Joy Bergelson
Joy Bergelson University of Chicago
Paul E. Verslues
Paul E. Verslues National Chung Hsing University
John P. Vogel
John P. Vogel University of California, Berkeley
Kerrie Barry
Kerrie Barry United States Department of Energy
Christine V. Hawkes
Christine V. Hawkes North Carolina State University
Roser Matamala
Roser Matamala Argonne National Laboratory
Jerry Jenkins
Jerry Jenkins Joint Genome Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry unlocks a wide range of career options across the healthcare and science sectors. Many students enhance their qualifications or change career direction by enrolling in flexible, online programs designed to meet industry needs.

For those interested in data management within healthcare, a bachelor's degree health information management prepares graduates for roles overseeing patient records, compliance, and informatics systems.

Individuals passionate about health and wellbeing might pursue an online master's degree in nutrition, gaining advanced knowledge in dietary science, public health, and clinical nutrition to improve community health outcomes.

Hands-on healthcare careers are also accessible online. Accredited ultrasound tech programs online offer critical clinical skills for diagnostic imaging roles, while the best online radiology tech programs focus on training students in the use of radiologic technologies for healthcare facilities.

These online degrees offer flexibility, affordability, and strong employment potential, making them excellent pathways for students seeking diverse roles related to biology and healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas E. Juenger

Trending Scientists