World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 38 8856 8270 518 507 148 6317

Emery Schubert publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Emery Schubert between 1959 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Emery Schubert published across 67 years, from 1959 to 2025, averaging 2.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2019. 7 of the 184 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1959 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2019. 1959: 1 publication 1960: 0 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 3 publications
1959 2025

184 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Emery Schubert: publications per year, 1959 to 2025
Year Publications
1959 1
1960 0
1961 0
1962 0
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 1
1992 0
1993 1
1994 0
1995 0
1996 1
1997 0
1998 0
1999 1
2000 0
2001 2
2002 1
2003 2
2004 4
2005 0
2006 8
2007 6
2008 10
2009 8
2010 12
2011 9
2012 6
2013 12
2014 13
2015 7
2016 7
2017 12
2018 5
2019 15
2020 9
2021 6
2022 10
2023 8
2024 4
2025 3
Total 184
Download as CSV

Emery Schubert publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emery Schubert sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 148 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597 148
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Emery Schubert D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emery Schubert sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641 38
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Emery Schubert is a researcher affiliated with the University of New South Wales in Australia. Their work spans several interconnected fields including Neuroscience, Computer Science, and Psychology, with a considerable focus on subfields such as Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Music, Signal Processing, and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

The core topics of Schubert's research involve Neuroscience and Music Perception, Music and Audio Processing, Diverse Music Education Insights, Music Technology and Sound Studies, Multisensory Perception and Integration, Aesthetic Perception and Analysis, and Music Therapy and Health.

Schubert has published extensively in a variety of scientific journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • PLoS ONE
  • Musicae Scientiae
  • Empirical Studies of the Arts
  • Advances in Multimedia

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by Schubert are:

  • "Creativity Is Optimal Novelty and Maximal Positive Affect: A New Definition Based on the Spreading Activation Model" (2021), published in Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • "The Aesthetic Emotion Lexicon: A Literature Review of Emotion Words Used by Researchers to Describe Aesthetic Experiences" (2023), published in Empirical Studies of the Arts

Schubert's collaborations include frequent co-authors such as Anthony Chmiel, Sergio Canazza, André Almeida, Joe Wolfe, and Weicong Li, reflecting engagements across a diverse range of interdisciplinary research areas.

Best Publications

  • Modeling Perceived Emotion With Continuous Musical Features

    Emery Schubert

  • What Works and What Doesn't Work? A Systematic Review of Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression and Anxiety in Young People.

    Sandra Garrido;Chris Millington;Daniel Cheers;Daniel Cheers;Katherine Boydell

  • Individual Differences in the Enjoyment of Negative Emotion in Music: A Literature Review and Experiment

    Sandra Garrido;Emery Schubert

  • Measuring emotion continuously: Validity and reliability of the two-dimensional emotion-space

    Emery Schubert

  • Continuous measurement of self-report emotional response to music.

    Emery Schubert

  • Relationships between expressed and felt emotions in music

    Paul Evans;Emery Schubert

  • Back to the inverted-U for music preference: A review of the literature:

    Anthony Chmiel;Emery Schubert

  • The influence of emotion, locus of emotion and familiarity upon preference in music.

    Emery Schubert

  • Enjoyment of negative emotions in music: An associative network explanation.

    Emery Schubert

  • Adaptive and maladaptive attraction to negative emotions in music.

    Sandra Garrido;Emery Schubert

  • Emotion felt by the listener and expressed by the music: literature review and theoretical perspectives.

    Emery Schubert

  • Cognitive Styles of Music Listening

    Gunter Kreutz;Emery Schubert;Laura A. Mitchell

  • Update of the Hevner adjective checklist.

    Emery Schubert

  • Moody melodies: Do they cheer us up? A study of the effect of sad music on mood:

    Sandra Garrido;Emery Schubert

  • Music and People with Tendencies to Depression

    Sandra Garrido;Emery Schubert

  • Expressiveness in music performance : empirical approaches across styles and cultures

    Dorottya Fabian;Renee Timmers;Emery Schubert

  • Continuous Self-Report Methods

    Emery schubert

  • Negative Emotion in Music: What is the Attraction? A Qualitative Study

    Sandra Garrido;Emery Schubert

  • Cognition and the temporal arts: Investigating audience response to dance using PDAs that record continuous data during live performance

    Catherine J. Stevens;Emery Schubert;Rua Haszard Morris;Matt Frear

  • Acoustic intensity causes perceived changes in arousal levels in music: an experimental investigation.

    Roger T. Dean;Freya Bailes;Emery Schubert

Frequent Co-Authors

Gary E. McPherson
Gary E. McPherson University of Melbourne
Adrian C. North
Adrian C. North Curtin University
David J. Hargreaves
David J. Hargreaves AstraZeneca (United Kingdom)
Katherine M. Boydell
Katherine M. Boydell Black Dog Institute
Andrea R. Halpern
Andrea R. Halpern Bucknell University
Roger T. Dean
Roger T. Dean Western Sydney University
Peter E. Keller
Peter E. Keller University of Sydney
Hillary Anger Elfenbein
Hillary Anger Elfenbein Washington University in St. Louis
Caroline Palmer
Caroline Palmer McGill University
Petri Laukka
Petri Laukka Uppsala University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Psychology in the USA opens doors to many career paths beyond traditional roles. One popular and rewarding direction is becoming a speech-language pathologist (SLP). SLPs work with individuals across all ages to assess, diagnose, and treat communication disorders, combining psychology and healthcare skills. This career requires both specialized education and state licensure.

For students considering this path, understanding certification requirements is essential, as each state has unique criteria. For example, those interested in working in the Southeast can review the Georgia slp certification requirements. If you want to practice in Hawaii, it's important to consult the Hawaii slp certification requirements. Similarly, aspiring professionals can find specific steps on how to become a speech language pathologist in Idaho. For those considering Illinois, check the Illinois speech pathologist certification requirements to guide your academic and professional journey.

Many universities offer online psychology degrees and related specialized programs, making it easier to gain the necessary qualifications while balancing other responsibilities. Researching your chosen state's requirements and program options can help you chart a clear path toward a fulfilling career in psychology and allied fields.

Best Scientists Citing Emery Schubert

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles