World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
E. Glenn Schellenberg

E. Glenn Schellenberg

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
64
Citations
18553
World Ranking
2937
National Ranking
181

E. Glenn Schellenberg publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where E. Glenn Schellenberg sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 141 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

E. Glenn Schellenberg D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where E. Glenn Schellenberg sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

E. Glenn Schellenberg is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada. Their research primarily spans the fields of neuroscience and psychology, with significant contributions to cognitive neuroscience and music-related studies.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics including neuroscience and music perception, diverse music education insights, hearing loss and rehabilitation, music therapy and health, multisensory perception and integration, music and audio processing, and reading and literacy development.

Key recent publications by E. Glenn Schellenberg and collaborators include:

  • Music Training and Nonmusical Abilities, 2023, Annual Review of Psychology
  • Individual differences in musical ability are stable over time in childhood, 2020, Developmental Science
  • Enhanced recognition of vocal emotions in individuals with naturally good musical abilities, 2020, Emotion
  • Rhythm and syntax processing in school-age children, 2020, Developmental Psychology
  • The Musical Ear Test: Norms and correlates from a large sample of Canadian undergraduates, 2021, Behavior Research Methods

Frequent co-authors in their research include César F. Lima, Ana Isabel Correia, Margherita Vincenzi, Patrícia Vanzella, and Ana P. Pinheiro.

Important venues where their work has been published multiple times are:

  • Behavior Research Methods
  • Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance
  • Music Perception An Interdisciplinary Journal
  • Developmental Science

Their research domain integrates insights from experimental and cognitive psychology, social psychology, and clinical psychology, contributing to a multidisciplinary understanding of music cognition and its broader impacts on psychological and neural processes.

Best Publications

  • Music Lessons Enhance IQ

    E. Glenn Schellenberg

  • Arousal, Mood, and The Mozart Effect:

    William Forde Thompson;E. Glenn Schellenberg;Gabriela Husain

  • Short-Term Music Training Enhances Verbal Intelligence and Executive Function

    Sylvain Moreno;Ellen Bialystok;Raluca Barac;E. Glenn Schellenberg

  • Effects of Musical Tempo and Mode on Arousal, Mood, and Spatial Abilities

    Gabriela Husain;William Forde Thompson;E. Glenn Schellenberg

  • Long-Term Positive Associations between Music Lessons and IQ.

    E. Glenn Schellenberg

  • Music and Cognitive Abilities

    E. Glenn Schellenberg

  • Decoding speech prosody: do music lessons help?

    William Forde Thompson;E. Glenn Schellenberg;Gabriela Husain

  • The Mozart Effect: An Artifact of Preference

    Kristin M. Nantais;E. Glenn Schellenberg

  • Exposure to music and cognitive performance: tests of children and adults

    E. Glenn Schellenberg;Takayuki Nakata;Patrick G. Hunter;Sachiko Tamoto

  • Feelings and Perceptions of Happiness and Sadness Induced by Music: Similarities, Differences, and Mixed Emotions

    Patrick G. Hunter;E. Glenn Schellenberg;Ulrich Schimmack

  • Music training, cognition, and personality.

    Kathleen A. Corrigall;E. Glenn Schellenberg;Nicole M. Misura

  • Examining the association between music lessons and intelligence

    E. Glenn Schellenberg

  • Liking for happy- and sad-sounding music: Effects of exposure

    E. Glenn Schellenberg;Isabelle Peretz;Sandrine Vieillard

  • Natural Musical Intervals: Evidence From Infant Listeners

    E. Glenn Schellenberg;Sandra E. Trehub

  • Mixed affective responses to music with conflicting cues

    Patrick G. Hunter;E. Glenn Schellenberg;Ulrich Schimmack

  • Simplifying the Implication-Realization Model of Melodic Expectancy

    E. Glenn Schellenberg

  • Good Pitch Memory Is Widespread

    E. Glenn Schellenberg;Sandra E. Trehub

  • Liking and memory for musical stimuli as a function of exposure.

    Karl K. Szpunar;E. Glenn Schellenberg;Patricia Pliner

  • Fast and loud background music disrupts reading comprehension

    William Forde Thompson;E. Glenn Schellenberg;Adriana Katharine Letnic

  • Evaluating Measures of Contemporary Sexism

    Bernadette Campbell;E. Glenn Schellenberg;Charlene Y. Senn

  • Group Music Training and Children's Prosocial Skills.

    E. Glenn Schellenberg;Kathleen A. Corrigall;Sebastian P. Dys;Tina Malti

Frequent Co-Authors

Sandra E. Trehub
Sandra E. Trehub University of Toronto
William Forde Thompson
William Forde Thompson Bond University
Laurel J. Trainor
Laurel J. Trainor McMaster University
Sylvain Moreno
Sylvain Moreno Simon Fraser University
Margaret C. McKinnon
Margaret C. McKinnon McMaster University
Isabelle Peretz
Isabelle Peretz University of Montreal
Ulrich Schimmack
Ulrich Schimmack University of Toronto
Kate C. McLean
Kate C. McLean Western Washington University
Patricia Pliner
Patricia Pliner University of Toronto
Ellen Bialystok
Ellen Bialystok York University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens the door to various rewarding career paths, especially as the demand for mental health professionals continues to grow across the USA. Many universities offer flexible online counseling and psychology programs, allowing students to balance their studies with work or family commitments.

Choosing the right program can significantly impact your future career. For example, those looking for the best counseling degree programs in Stockton can benefit from schools that emphasize community engagement and hands-on training. If you're based in Arizona, exploring the top counseling degree programs in Tucson could provide tailored opportunities related to the local job market and client population.

Texas has become a hub for students seeking Texas counseling degree programs, thanks to an array of accredited institutions prioritizing both online and in-person learning. Similarly, those interested in the Pacific Northwest might consider programs listed in the best counseling program rankings in Washington to help inform their educational choices.

No matter your location, researching these program rankings can help you find accredited degrees that align with your career aspirations in psychology and counseling.

Best Scientists Citing E. Glenn Schellenberg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles