World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Gavin M. Bidelman

Gavin M. Bidelman

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
47
Citations
8003
World Ranking
6215
National Ranking
3368

Neuroscience

D-Index
47
Citations
8218
World Ranking
6449
National Ranking
2803

Gavin M. Bidelman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gavin M. Bidelman sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 174 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Gavin M. Bidelman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gavin M. Bidelman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gavin M. Bidelman is affiliated with Indiana University in the United States and focuses primarily on research within the disciplines of Neuroscience and Psychology. Their scholarly work intersects several subfields, notably Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Signal Processing, Sensory Systems, and Developmental and Educational Psychology.

Their research topics encompass Neuroscience and Music Perception, Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation, Neural dynamics and brain function, Multisensory perception and integration, Phonetics and Phonology Research, EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces, as well as Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, and Genetics.

Some of their recent publications include:

  • Attention reinforces human corticofugal system to aid speech perception in noise (2021, NeuroImage)
  • Musicians Show Improved Speech Segregation in Competitive, Multi-Talker Cocktail Party Scenarios (2020, Frontiers in Psychology)
  • Subcortical rather than cortical sources of the frequency-following response (FFR) relate to speech-in-noise perception in normal-hearing listeners (2021, Neuroscience Letters)
  • Effects of Noise on the Behavioral and Neural Categorization of Speech (2020, Frontiers in Neuroscience)

They frequently collaborate with several researchers, with notable coauthors including Rose Rizzi, Mohammed Yeasin, Sara Momtaz, Claude Alain, and Jessica MacLean.

Their work has appeared repeatedly in particular publication venues, with multiple papers published in:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • Brain Sciences
  • NeuroImage
  • Brain Research

Best Publications

  • Cross-domain effects of music and language experience on the representation of pitch in the human auditory brainstem

    Gavin M. Bidelman;Jackson T. Gandour;Ananthanarayan Krishnan

  • Tone Language Speakers and Musicians Share Enhanced Perceptual and Cognitive Abilities for Musical Pitch: Evidence for Bidirectionality between the Domains of Language and Music

    Gavin M. Bidelman;Stefanie Hutka;Sylvain Moreno

  • Effects of reverberation on brainstem representation of speech in musicians and non-musicians.

    Gavin M. Bidelman;Ananthanarayan Krishnan

  • Examining neural plasticity and cognitive benefit through the unique lens of musical training

    Sylvain Moreno;Gavin M. Bidelman

  • Neural Correlates of Consonance, Dissonance, and the Hierarchy of Musical Pitch in the Human Brainstem

    Gavin M. Bidelman;Ananthanarayan Krishnan

  • Subcortical sources dominate the neuroelectric auditory frequency-following response to speech.

    Gavin M. Bidelman

  • Musical Training Orchestrates Coordinated Neuroplasticity in Auditory Brainstem and Cortex to Counteract Age-Related Declines in Categorical Vowel Perception

    Gavin M. Bidelman;Claude Alain

  • Age-related changes in the subcortical–cortical encoding and categorical perception of speech

    Gavin M. Bidelman;Joshua W. Villafuerte;Sylvain Moreno;Claude Alain

  • Tracing the emergence of categorical speech perception in the human auditory system.

    Gavin M. Bidelman;Sylvain Moreno;Claude Alain

  • Musicians and tone-language speakers share enhanced brainstem encoding but not perceptual benefits for musical pitch

    Gavin M. Bidelman;Jackson T. Gandour;Ananthanarayan Krishnan

  • Turning down the noise: The benefit of musical training on the aging auditory brain

    Claude Alain;Benjamin Rich Zendel;Stefanie Hutka;Gavin M. Bidelman

  • Coordinated plasticity in brainstem and auditory cortex contributes to enhanced categorical speech perception in musicians.

    Gavin M. Bidelman;Michael W. Weiss;Sylvain Moreno;Claude Alain

  • Multichannel recordings of the human brainstem frequency-following response: scalp topography, source generators, and distinctions from the transient ABR.

    Gavin M. Bidelman

  • The effects of tone language experience on pitch processing in the brainstem

    Ananthanarayan Krishnan;Jackson T. Gandour;Gavin M. Bidelman

  • Inherent auditory skills rather than formal music training shape the neural encoding of speech.

    Kelsey Mankel;Gavin M. Bidelman

  • Enhanced brainstem encoding predicts musicians’ perceptual advantages with pitch

    Gavin M. Bidelman;Ananthanarayan Krishnan;Jackson T. Gandour

  • Cognitive and Neural Plasticity in Older Adults’ Prospective Memory Following Training with the Virtual Week Computer Game

    Nathan S. Rose;Peter G. Rendell;Alexandra Hering;Matthias Kliegel

  • Experience-dependent neural representation of dynamic pitch in the brainstem.

    Ananthanarayan Krishnan;Jackson T. Gandour;Gavin M. Bidelman;Jayaganesh Swaminathan

  • Mild Cognitive Impairment Is Characterized by Deficient Brainstem and Cortical Representations of Speech.

    Gavin M. Bidelman;Jill E. Lowther;Sunghee H. Tak;Claude Alain

  • Functional changes in inter- and intra-hemispheric cortical processing underlying degraded speech perception

    Gavin M. Bidelman;Megan Howell

Frequent Co-Authors

Claude Alain
Claude Alain University of Toronto
Ananthanarayan Krishnan
Ananthanarayan Krishnan Purdue University West Lafayette
Jackson T. Gandour
Jackson T. Gandour Purdue University West Lafayette
Sylvain Moreno
Sylvain Moreno Simon Fraser University
Maureen G. Maguire
Maureen G. Maguire University of Pennsylvania
Richard L. Doty
Richard L. Doty University of Pennsylvania
Paul S. Bernstein
Paul S. Bernstein University of Utah
Laurel J. Trainor
Laurel J. Trainor McMaster University
D. Kimbrough Oller
D. Kimbrough Oller University of Memphis
Jeffrey R. Lucas
Jeffrey R. Lucas Purdue University West Lafayette

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in neuroscience often intersects with related fields such as psychology, social work, and counseling. Exploring these options can give you a broader foundation or alternative career routes. For example, many students are interested in finding the cheapest psychology degree online to save on tuition while gaining relevant knowledge in human behavior and mental health.

Another popular option is social work. Some programs are accessible even if you have a non-traditional background. If you're looking for flexible entry requirements, consider checking the easiest msw program to help streamline your path toward a licensed social work role.

For those wanting a clinical focus, clinical psychology doctoral programs are also available online, with many highly-ranked choices. Explore the best online psyd programs to see how you might prepare for careers in assessment and therapy.

Additionally, specializing in family and marriage therapy can be a natural fit for neuroscience graduates interested in therapeutic practice. Accelerate your career by exploring an online lmft program and enter the counseling workforce faster.

By complementing your neuroscience education with related online degrees, you can open doors to diverse roles in research, therapy, and mental health services.

Best Scientists Citing Gavin M. Bidelman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles