World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
35
Citations
5697
World Ranking
9159
National Ranking
3866

Ananthanarayan Krishnan publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ananthanarayan Krishnan sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 71 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Ananthanarayan Krishnan D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ananthanarayan Krishnan sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ananthanarayan Krishnan is affiliated with Purdue University West Lafayette in the United States. Their research primarily situates within neuroscience, with a significant focus on cognitive neuroscience, sensory systems, speech and hearing, experimental and cognitive psychology, and endocrine and autonomic systems.

Their work encompasses several main topics, including:

  • Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Noise Effects and Management
  • Multisensory Perception and Integration
  • Neuroscience of Respiration and Sleep

Krishnan has contributed to multiple peer-reviewed publications, with recent papers covering various aspects of auditory and cognitive neuroscience. Notable papers include:

  • "Cortical hemisphere preference and brainstem ear asymmetry reflect experience-dependent functional modulation of pitch," 2021, Brain and Language
  • "Search for Electrophysiological Indices of Hidden Hearing Loss in Humans: Click Auditory Brainstem Response Across Sound Levels and in Background Noise," 2020, Ear and Hearing
  • "Frequency-Following Response to Steady-State Vowel in Quiet and Background Noise Among Marching Band Participants With Normal Hearing," 2022, American Journal of Audiology
  • "Quick Estimation of Minimum Hearing Levels Using a Binaural Multifrequency Stimulus Paradigm: Proof of Concept," 2024, Ear and Hearing

Frequent coauthors include:

  • Chandan H. Suresh
  • Jackson T. Gandour
  • Aditi Gargeshwari
  • Rafael E. Delgado

The venues where Krishnan has most commonly published include:

  • Ear and Hearing
  • American Journal of Audiology
  • Brain and Language

Best Publications

  • Encoding of pitch in the human brainstem is sensitive to language experience

    Ananthanarayan Krishnan;Yisheng Xu;Jackson Gandour;Peter Cariani

  • Cross-domain effects of music and language experience on the representation of pitch in the human auditory brainstem

    Gavin M. Bidelman;Jackson T. Gandour;Ananthanarayan Krishnan

  • Effects of reverberation on brainstem representation of speech in musicians and non-musicians.

    Gavin M. Bidelman;Ananthanarayan Krishnan

  • Neural Correlates of Consonance, Dissonance, and the Hierarchy of Musical Pitch in the Human Brainstem

    Gavin M. Bidelman;Ananthanarayan Krishnan

  • Human frequency-following responses: representation of steady-state synthetic vowels.

    Ananthanarayan Krishnan

  • Relative influence of musical and linguistic experience on early cortical processing of pitch contours

    Bharath Chandrasekaran;Ananthanarayan Krishnan;Jackson T. Gandour

  • Aging alters the perception and physiological representation of frequency: evidence from human frequency-following response recordings.

    Christopher G. Clinard;Kelly L. Tremblay;Ananthanarayan R. Krishnan

  • Human frequency-following response: representation of pitch contours in Chinese tones.

    Ananthanarayan Krishnan;Yisheng Xu;Jackson T. Gandour;Peter A. Cariani

  • Musicians and tone-language speakers share enhanced brainstem encoding but not perceptual benefits for musical pitch

    Gavin M. Bidelman;Jackson T. Gandour;Ananthanarayan Krishnan

  • Mismatch negativity to pitch contours is influenced by language experience.

    Bharath Chandrasekaran;Ananthanarayan Krishnan;Jackson T. Gandour

  • The role of the auditory brainstem in processing linguistically-relevant pitch patterns

    Ananthanarayan Krishnan;Jackson T. Gandour

  • The effects of tone language experience on pitch processing in the brainstem

    Ananthanarayan Krishnan;Jackson T. Gandour;Gavin M. Bidelman

  • Experience-dependent enhancement of linguistic pitch representation in the brainstem is not specific to a speech context

    Ananthanarayan Krishnan;Jayaganesh Swaminathan;Jackson T. Gandour

  • Brainstem correlates of temporal auditory processing in children with specific language impairment.

    Madhavi Basu;Ananthanarayan Krishnan;Christine Weber-Fox

  • Enhanced brainstem encoding predicts musicians’ perceptual advantages with pitch

    Gavin M. Bidelman;Ananthanarayan Krishnan;Jackson T. Gandour

  • Experience-dependent neural representation of dynamic pitch in the brainstem.

    Ananthanarayan Krishnan;Jackson T. Gandour;Gavin M. Bidelman;Jayaganesh Swaminathan

  • Specificity of experience-dependent pitch representation in the brainstem.

    Yisheng Xu;Ananthanarayan Krishnan;Jackson T. Gandour

  • A comparative study of avian auditory brainstem responses: correlations with phylogeny and vocal complexity, and seasonal effects

    J R Lucas;T M Freeberg;A Krishnan;G R Long

  • Pitch encoding in speech and nonspeech contexts in the human auditory brainstem.

    Jayaganesh Swaminathan;Ananthanarayan Krishnan;Jackson T. Gandour

  • Neuroplasticity in the processing of pitch dimensions: A multidimensional scaling analysis of the mismatch negativity

    Bharath Chandrasekaran;Jackson T. Gandour;Ananthanarayan Krishnan

Frequent Co-Authors

Jackson T. Gandour
Jackson T. Gandour Purdue University West Lafayette
Gavin M. Bidelman
Gavin M. Bidelman Indiana University
Bharath Chandrasekaran
Bharath Chandrasekaran University of Pittsburgh
Christopher J. Plack
Christopher J. Plack Lancaster University
Jyrki Ahveninen
Jyrki Ahveninen Harvard University
Iiro P. Jääskeläinen
Iiro P. Jääskeläinen Aalto University
Robert Patuzzi
Robert Patuzzi University of Western Australia
Carles Escera
Carles Escera University of Barcelona
Jeffrey R. Lucas
Jeffrey R. Lucas Purdue University West Lafayette
Jack Gandour
Jack Gandour Purdue University West Lafayette

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Neuroscience often leads to exciting, flexible educational options and diverse career pathways. For those interested in advanced psychology practice, online psyd programs provide a pathway toward clinical expertise and leadership roles in mental health.

If your interests lie in therapy and counseling within the neuroscience field, consider the convenience and speed of online mft programs, which prepare students to become marriage and family therapists.

For undergraduates eager to accelerate their entry into neuroscience or related fields, an accelerated bachelor's degree can significantly cut down study time and costs without compromising on rigor or quality.

Interested in maximizing your career and salary potential? Explore the best degree in the world to discover bachelor’s paths that consistently lead to lucrative and rewarding opportunities—many of which intersect with neuroscience and related STEM areas.

Best Scientists Citing Ananthanarayan Krishnan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles