World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 38 8489 3614 65 7650

Steven G. Zecker publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Steven G. Zecker between 1982 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Steven G. Zecker published across 40 years, from 1982 to 2021, averaging 1.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 6 publications in 2009. 1 of the 65 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 6. Peak 6 publications in 2009. 1982: 2 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 2 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 4 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 3 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 2 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 1 publication
1982 2021

65 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Steven G. Zecker: publications per year, 1982 to 2021
Year Publications
1982 2
1983 1
1984 2
1985 0
1986 1
1987 1
1988 0
1989 0
1990 1
1991 4
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 1
1996 1
1997 1
1998 1
1999 3
2000 3
2001 3
2002 1
2003 2
2004 4
2005 2
2006 2
2007 2
2008 4
2009 6
2010 3
2011 2
2012 2
2013 2
2014 1
2015 2
2016 2
2017 2
2018 0
2019 0
2020 0
2021 1
Total 65
Download as CSV

Steven G. Zecker publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven G. Zecker sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 58–67 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 65 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193 65
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Steven G. Zecker D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven G. Zecker sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459 38
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Steven G. Zecker was affiliated with Northwestern University in the United States. Their research focused primarily on fields related to medicine and health professions, with specific emphasis on speech and hearing, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, and physiology.

The main topics covered in their work included:

  • Dysphagia Assessment and Management
  • Tracheal and airway disorders
  • Voice and Speech Disorders

Zecker's publication record included work in the journal Head & Neck, with at least one paper published:

  • Respiratory-swallow coordination and swallowing impairment in head and neck cancer (2021), published in Head & Neck

Frequent coauthors collaborating on research included:

  • Theresa Hopkins-Rossabi
  • Kent Armeson
  • Bonnie Martin-Harris

The combination of research topics and publication venues suggests an interdisciplinary approach integrating respiratory function, speech pathology, and clinical medicine. Their contributions addressed both assessment and management strategies for swallowing and airway disorders.

Steven G. Zecker passed away, with their body of work remaining part of the academic record within their specialized fields of study.

Best Publications

  • Auditory Neurophysiologic Responses and Discrimination Deficits in Children with Learning Problems

    Nina Kraus;Therese J. McGee;Thomas D. Carrell;Steven G. Zecker

  • Auditory training improves neural timing in the human brainstem

    Nicole M. Russo;Trent G. Nicol;Steven G. Zecker;Erin A. Hayes

  • Neurobiologic responses to speech in noise in children with learning problems: deficits and strategies for improvement

    Jenna Cunningham;Trent Nicol;Steven G Zecker;Ann R Bradlow

  • Reading and Subcortical Auditory Function

    Karen Banai;Jane Hornickel;Erika Skoe;Trent Nicol

  • Neural plasticity following auditory training in children with learning problems.

    Erin A Hayes;Catherine M Warrier;Trent G Nicol;Steven G Zecker

  • Right-Hemisphere Auditory Cortex Is Dominant for Coding Syllable Patterns in Speech

    Daniel A. Abrams;Trent Nicol;Steven Zecker;Nina Kraus

  • Subcortical differentiation of stop consonants relates to reading and speech-in-noise perception

    Jane Hornickel;Erika Skoe;Trent Nicol;Steven Zecker

  • Deficient Brainstem Encoding of Pitch in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders

    N.M. Russo;E. Skoe;B. Trommer;T. Nicol

  • Brainstem timing: implications for cortical processing and literacy.

    Karen Banai;Trent Nicol;Steven G Zecker;Nina Kraus

  • Brainstem transcription of speech is disrupted in children with autism spectrum disorders

    Nicole Russo;Trent Nicol;Barbara Trommer;Steve Zecker

  • Stimulant therapy and seizure risk in children with ADHD

    Sarah A Hemmer;Joseph F Pasternak;Steven G Zecker;Barbara L Trommer

  • Nonlinguistic perceptual deficits associated with reading and language disorders.

    Beverly A Wright;Richard W Bowen;Steven G Zecker

  • Developmental plasticity in the human auditory brainstem.

    Krista L. Johnson;Trent Nicol;Steven G. Zecker;Nina Kraus

  • Speech-evoked neurophysiologic responses in children with learning problems: development and behavioral correlates of perception.

    Jenna Cunningham;Trent Nicol;Steven Zecker;Nina Kraus

  • Abnormal cortical processing of the syllable rate of speech in poor readers

    Daniel A. Abrams;Trent Nicol;Steven Zecker;Nina Kraus

  • Drooling, saliva production, and swallowing in cerebral palsy

    Jill E Senner;Jerilyn Logemann;Steven Zecker;Deborah Gaebler-Spira

  • Assistive listening devices drive neuroplasticity in children with dyslexia

    Jane Hornickel;Steven G. Zecker;Ann R. Bradlow;Nina Kraus

  • Effects of lengthened formant transition duration on discrimination and neural representation of synthetic CV syllables by normal and learning- disabled children

    Ann R. Bradlow;Nina Kraus;Trent G. Nicol;Therese J. McGee

  • Effects of background noise on cortical encoding of speech in autism spectrum disorders.

    Nicole Russo;Steven Zecker;Barbara Trommer;Julia Chen

  • Behavioral hearing thresholds between 0.125 and 20 kHz using depth-compensated ear simulator calibration.

    Jungmee Lee;Sumitrajit Dhar;Rebekah Abel;Renee Banakis

  • The Go-No Go Test in Attention Deficit Disorder Is Sensitive to Methylphenidate:

    Barbara L. Trommer;Jo-Ann B. Hoeppner;Steven G. Zecker

Frequent Co-Authors

Nina Kraus
Nina Kraus Northwestern University
Trent Nicol
Trent Nicol Northwestern University
Ann R. Bradlow
Ann R. Bradlow Northwestern University
Erika Skoe
Erika Skoe University of Connecticut
Jeri A. Logemann
Jeri A. Logemann Northwestern University
Samira Anderson
Samira Anderson University of Maryland, College Park
Bharath Chandrasekaran
Bharath Chandrasekaran University of Pittsburgh
James W. Griffith
James W. Griffith Northwestern University
Robert D. Frisina
Robert D. Frisina University of South Florida
Michael K. Tanenhaus
Michael K. Tanenhaus University of Rochester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students fascinated by neuroscience, exploring related online degree programs can open additional career pathways. Many neuroscience graduates choose to further their studies in counseling, therapy, or psychology. Accredited online options provide affordable and flexible routes to these advanced roles.

Those interested in counseling should consider cacrep-accredited programs to satisfy licensure requirements and ensure program quality. For cost-conscious learners, there is a range of cheapest online lpc programs that prepare students for work as Licensed Professional Counselors.

If you're interested in guiding couples and families, affordable online mft programs can help you qualify as a Marriage and Family Therapist. Alternatively, a affordable online master's in psychology can offer broad training for roles in research, counseling, or therapy—and can be a solid foundation for doctoral study.

With these diverse online options, students can tailor their education to fit career aspirations in neuroscience, mental health, or human behavior.

Best Scientists Citing Steven G. Zecker

Recently Published Articles